NC General Statutes
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 150B-18 (2026)
Scope and effect
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NCLEGncleg.gov (official)
JustiaChapter 150B
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This Article applies to an agency's exercise of its authority to adopt a rule. A rule is not valid unless it is adopted in substantial compliance with this Article. An agency shall not seek to implement or enforce against any person a policy, guideline, or other interpretive statement that meets the definition of a rule contained in G.S. 150B-2(8a) if the policy, guideline, or other interpretive statement has not been adopted as a rule in accordance with this Article. (1991, c. 418, s. 1; 2011-398, s. 1; 2012-187, s. 2.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1994–2025 · leading case: Cabarrus Cty. Bd. of Educ. v. Dep't of State Treasurer, 821 S.E.2d 196 (N.C. Ct. App. 2018).
Cabarrus Cty. Bd. of Educ. v. Dep't of State Treasurer, 821 S.E.2d 196 (N.C. Ct. App. 2018). “"An agency shall not seek to implement or enforce against any person a policy, guideline, or other interpretive statement that meets the definition of a rule contained in G.”
Affordable Care, Inc. v. North Carolina State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 571 S.E.2d 52 (N.C. Ct. App. 2002). “N.C. Gen. Stat. § 150B-18 (2001). The Commission substantially complied with APA procedures in adopting the Rule, and to the extent it deviated slightly from proscribed procedures, plaintiffs’ due process rights were not violated.”
Jackson v. North Carolina Dep't of Human Resources Div. of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, & Substance Abuse Servs., 505 S.E.2d 899 (N.C. Ct. App. 1998). “” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 150B-18 (1991). The necessary procedures for substantial compliance are outlined in G.”
Holly Ridge Assocs., LLC v. North Carolina Dep't of Env't & Nat. Resources, 627 S.E.2d 326 (N.C. Ct. App. 2006). “In addition, no agency pronouncement of any kind is valid and enforceable as a rule unless adopted in substantial compliance with the notice, comment, public hearing, and other requirements for adopting a rule under the APA.”
Comm'r of Labor v. Weekley Homes, L.P., 609 S.E.2d 407 (N.C. Ct. App. 2005). “In petitioner’s second argument, he contends the multi-employer citation policy is invalid because it has not been promulgated as a rule.”
Dillingham v. North Carolina Dep't of Human Resources, 513 S.E.2d 823 (N.C. Ct. App. 1999). “*711 However, these regulations do not address the nature of the evidence required to rebut the presumptions arising from such transfers; rather they merely require “verification” of the transfer of assets.”
North Carolina State Bar v. Brewer, 644 S.E.2d 573 (N.C. Ct. App. 2007). “See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 150B-18 (2005). We note, however, that N.”
Duke Univ. Med. Ctr. v. Bruton, 516 S.E.2d 633 (N.C. Ct. App. 1999). “” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 150B-18 (1995). For the following reasons we conclude that DMAs policy is a legislative rule, and application of that policy constitutes an unlawful procedure under the NCAPA; thus, we affirm the superior court’s ruling that the agency acted without authority…”
Walker v. The N.C. State Bd. Of Dental Exam'rs, 782 S.E.2d 518 (N.C. Ct. App. 2016). “"Article [2a of the APA, N.C. Gen.Stat. §§ 150B-18 -21.28 (2013), governs] .”
N.C. Acupuncture Licensing Bd. v. N.C. Bd. of Physical Therapy Examiners, 821 S.E.2d 376 (N.C. 2018). “§ 150B-18 (2017). Therefore, this change in policy is not forbidden by the Rules Review Commission's subsequent rejection of a rule on a related subject.”
Ford v. State, Dept. of Crime Control, 445 S.E.2d 425 (N.C. Ct. App. 1994). “See G.S. § 150B-18 to -21.7. We find plaintiff’s assertions unfounded.”
Arrowood v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 535 S.E.2d 585 (N.C. Ct. App. 2000). “N.C. Gen. Stat. § 150B-18. The APA defines a rule as “any agency regulation, standard, or statement of general applicability which implements or interprets an enactment of the General Assembly or Congress or a regulation adopted by a federal agency, or that describes the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.