N.C. Gen. Stat. » Chapter 16
NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 16-3 (2026)

Certain contracts as to "futures" void

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 16 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Every contract, whether in writing or not, whereby any person shall agree to sell and deliver any cotton, Indian corn, wheat, rye, oats, tobacco, meal, lard, bacon, salt pork, salt fish, beef, cattle, sugar, coffee, stocks, bonds, and chooses in action, at a place and at a time specified and agreed upon therein, to any other person, whether the person to whom such article is so agreed to be sold and delivered shall be a party to such contract or not, when, in fact, and notwithstanding the terms expressed of such contract, it is not intended by the parties thereto that the articles or things so agreed to be sold and delivered shall be actually delivered, or the value thereof paid, but it is intended and understood by them that money or other thing of value shall be paid to the one party by the other, or to a third party, the party to whom such payment of money or other thing of value shall be made to depend, and the amount of such money or other thing of value so to be paid to depend upon whether the market price or value of the article so agreed to be sold and delivered is greater or less at the time and place so specified than the price stipulated to be paid and received for the articles so to be sold and delivered, and every contract commonly called "futures" as to the several articles and things hereinbefore specified, or any of them, by whatever other name called, and every contract as to the said several articles and things, or any of them, whereby the parties thereto contemplate and intend no real transaction as to the article or thing agreed to be delivered, but only the payment of a sum of money or other thing of value, such payment and the amount thereof and the person to whom the same is to be paid to depend on whether or not the market price or value is greater or less than the price so agreed to be paid for the said article or thing at the time and place specified in such contract, shall be utterly null and void; and no action shall be maintained in any court to enforce any such contract, whether the same was made in or out of the State, or partly in and partly out of this State, and whether made by the parties thereto by themselves or by or through their agents, immediately or mediately; nor shall any party to any such contract, or any agent of any such party, directly or remotely connected with any such contract in any way whatever, have or maintain any action or cause of action on account of any money or other thing of value paid or advanced or hypothecated by him or them in connection with or on account of such contract and agency; nor shall the courts of this State have any jurisdiction to entertain any suit or action brought upon a judgment based upon any such contract. This section shall not be construed so as to apply to any person, firm or corporation, or his or their agents, engaged in the business of manufacturing or wholesale merchandising in the purchase and/or sale of the necessary commodities required in the ordinary course of their business; nor shall this section be construed so as to apply to any contract with respect to the purchase and/or sale for future delivery of any of the articles or things mentioned and referred to in this section, where such purchase and/or sale is made on any exchange on which any such article or things are regularly bought and sold, or contracts therefor regularly entered into, and the rules and regulations of such exchange are such that either party to such contract may require delivery thereof: Provided, such contract is made in accordance with such rules and regulations.

In addition, this Article shall not apply to any person, firm, corporation, or other entity, either as principal or agent, or to any contract, that is excluded or exempted under the Commodity Exchange Act, as provided in section 16(e)(2) of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. § 16(e)(2), and, accordingly, each section of this Article shall be considered a "law that regulates or prohibits the operation of bucket shops" within the meaning of section 16(e)(2) of the Commodity Exchange Act. (1889, c. 221, s. 1; 1905, c. 538, s. 7; Rev., s. 1689; 1909, c. 853, s. 1; C.S., s. 2144; 1931, c. 236, s. 1; 2001-110, s. 1.)

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1951–2012 · leading case: Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc. v. Hunsucker, 248 S.E.2d 567 (N.C. Ct. App. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc. v. Hunsucker, 248 S.E.2d 567 (N.C. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 2× “The defendant’s assertion is based upon G.S. 16-3 which provides that, unless the contracts are traded on a recognized exchange whose rules and regulations require actual delivery of the commodity if demanded by either party, the courts of this State shall not have jurisdiction…”
MGM Desert Inn, Inc. v. Holz, 411 S.E.2d 399 (N.C. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 3× “N.C.G.S. § 16-3 (1983). The Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act provides, “The provisions of this Article shall not apply to foreign judgments based on claims which are contrary to the public policies of North Carolina.”
Knight Publ'g Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 479 S.E.2d 478 (N.C. Ct. App. 1997). “White & Summers, supra, at § 16-3 (under UCC § 4-406, customer not responsible for checking indorsements).”
Town of Nags Head v. Toloczko, 863 F. Supp. 2d 516 (E.D.N.C. 2012). “In addition, any construction or maintenance work (but not demolition work) on prohibited structures now requires building permits.”
Royster v. Hancock, 69 S.E.2d 29 (N.C. 1952). “2146 (1919) which provided that when the defendant in any action pending should allege specifically in his verified answer that plaintiffs cause of action was founded upon a contract made void by C.S. 2144, the burden of proof should be upon the plaintiff to show by proper…”
Marx v. Maddrey, 94 F. Supp. 784 (E.D.N.C. 1951). · cites it 3× “While the defendant’s answer fails to refer to North *785 Carolina General Statutes, § 16-3 as the basis for his contention that “the arrangement and agreement was void”, it.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.