If any registered voter is challenged as having been convicted of any crime which excludes him from the right of suffrage, he shall be required to answer any question in relation to the alleged conviction, but his answers to such questions shall not be used against him in any criminal prosecution. (1901, c. 89, s. 71; Rev., s. 3388; C.S., s. 5974; 1967, c. 775, s. 1; 2017-6, s. 3; 2018-146, s. 3.1(a), (b).)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
1
case, 2016–2016 · leading case:
Action NC v. Strach, 216 F. Supp. 3d 597 (M.D.N.C. 2016).
Action NC v. Strach, 216 F. Supp. 3d 597 (M.D.N.C. 2016).
· cites it 2× “See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 163-90 ,3. Finally, Section 5 Defendants argue that there is no evidence of systemic failures in the DMV’s transmission of voter registration information to SBE because there is “no significant error rate” and “DMV is processing voter registration…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.