NC General Statutes
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 168-6 (2026)
Repealed by Session Laws 1985, c. 571, s. 3
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NCLEGncleg.gov (official)
JustiaChapter 168
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1979–2022 · leading case: Burgess v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co., 259 S.E.2d 248 (N.C. 1979).
Burgess v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co., 259 S.E.2d 248 (N.C. 1979). “This right is granted by G.S. 168-6, which provides, in pertinent part, that “handicapped persons shall be employed .”
Buchanan v. Hunter Douglas, Inc., 359 S.E.2d 271 (N.C. Ct. App. 1987). “Each of the five claims for relief in this latest complaint are based on N.C.G.S. § 168-6. This statute, however, was repealed by the North Carolina General Assembly on 1 October 1985, which was, as is evident from the foregoing, after this action was first brought and…”
Spaulding v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 379 S.E.2d 49 (N.C. Ct. App. 1989). “Plaintiff brought suit under the Handicapped Persons Act right to employment statute, formerly N.C. Gen. Stat. § 168-6 (1982), which was repealed in 1985.”
Pressman v. Univ. of North Carolina at Charlotte, 337 S.E.2d 644 (N.C. Ct. App. 1985). “G.S. 168-6 provides: “Handicapped persons shall be employed in the State service, the service of the political subdivisions of the State, in the public schools, and in all other employment, both public and private, on the same terms and conditions as the ablebodied, unless it is…”
Burgess v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co., 250 S.E.2d 687 (N.C. Ct. App. 1979). “) § 168-6. Right to employment. —Handicapped persons shall be employed in the State service, the service of the political subdivisions of the State, in the public schools, and in all other employment, both public and private, on the same terms and conditions as the ablebodied,…”
Woody v. AccuQuest Hearing Ctr. (N.C. Ct. App. 2022). “Handicapped persons shall be employed in [all] employment, both public and private, on the same terms and conditions as the able-bodied, unless it is show that the particular disability impairs the performance of the work involved.”
Woody v. AccuQuest Hearing Ctr. (N.C. Ct. App. 2022). “Handicapped persons shall be employed in [all] employment, both public and private, on the same terms and conditions as the able-bodied, unless it is show that the particular disability impairs the performance of the work involved.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.