NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 24-11 (2026)

Certain revolving credit charges

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 24 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) On the extension of credit under an open-end credit or similar plan (including revolving credit card plans, and revolving charge accounts, but excluding any loan made directly by a lender under a check loan, check credit or other such plan) under which no service charge shall be imposed upon the consumer or debtor if the account is paid in full within 25 days from the billing date, but upon which there may be imposed an annual charge not to exceed twenty-four dollars ($24.00), there may be charged and collected interest, finance charges or other fees at a rate in the aggregate not to exceed one and one-half percent (1 1/2%) per month computed on the unpaid portion of the balance of the previous month less payments or credit within the billing cycle or the average daily balance outstanding during the current billing period.

(a1) If the lender chooses not to impose an annual charge under this section, the lender may impose a service charge not to exceed two dollars ($2.00) per month on the balance of any account which is not paid in full within 25 days from the billing date.

(a2) No person, firm or corporation may charge a discount or fee in excess of six percent (6%) of the principal amount of the accounts acquired from or through any vendors or others providing services who participate in such plan.

(b) On revolving credit loans (including check loans, check credit or other revolving credit plans whereby a bank, banking institution or other lending agency makes direct loans to a borrower), if agreed to in writing by the borrower, such lender may collect interest and service charges by application of a monthly periodic rate computed on the average daily balance outstanding during the billing period, such rate not to exceed one and one-half percent (1 1/2%).

(c) Any extension of credit under an open-end or similar plan under which there is charged a monthly periodic rate greater than one and one-quarter percent (1 1/4%) may not be secured by real or personal property or any other thing of value, provided, that this subsection shall not apply to consumer credit sales regulated by Chapter 25A, the Retail Installment Sales Act; provided further, that in any action initiated for the possession of property in which a security interest has been taken, a judgment for the possession thereof shall be restricted to commercial units (as defined in G.S. 25-2-105(f)) for which the cash price was one hundred dollars ($100.00) or more.

(d) The term "billing date" shall mean any date selected by the creditor and the bill for the balance of the account must be mailed to the customer at least 14 days prior to the date specified in the statement as being the date by which payment of the new balance must be made in order to avoid the imposition of any finance charge.

(d1) A lender may charge a party to a loan or extension of credit governed by this section a late payment charge not to exceed five dollars ($5.00) on accounts having an outstanding balance of less than one hundred dollars ($100.00) and ten dollars ($10.00) on accounts having an outstanding balance of one hundred dollars ($100.00) or more, for any payment past due for 30 days or more; provided, in no case shall the late charge exceed the outstanding principal balance. If a late payment charge has been once imposed with respect to a late payment, no late charge shall be imposed with respect to any future payment which would have been timely and sufficient but for the previous default.

(e) An annual or service charge pursuant to this section upon an existing credit card account upon which the charge has not previously been imposed may not be imposed unless the lender has given the cardholder at least 30 days notice of the proposed charge, and has advised the cardholder of his right not to accept the new charge. This notice shall be bold and conspicuous, and shall be on the face of the periodic billing statement or on a separate statement which is clearly noted on the face of the periodic billing statement provided to the cardholder. If the cardholder does not accept the new charge upon an existing credit card account, the lender may require that the cardholder make no further use of the account beyond the 30-day period in order to avoid paying the annual charge, but the cardholder shall be entitled to pay off any remaining balance according to the terms of the credit agreement. Nothing in this subsection shall limit the lender from decreasing any rates or fees to the cardholder forthwith. Should any cardholder within 12 months of the initial imposition of an annual charge rescind his credit card contract and surrender all cards issued under the contract to the lender, he shall be entitled to a prorated refund of the annual fee previously charged, credited to the cardholder's credit card account. (1967, c. 852, s. 1.1; 1969, c. 1303, s. 7; 1977, c. 148, s. 1; cc. 917, 1108; 1979, 2nd Sess., c. 1330, s. 3; 1981, c. 844, s. 1; 1983, c. 126, ss. 5, 10; 1991, c. 506, s. 6; c. 761, s. 45; 1995, c. 387, s. 2; 2009-570, s. 27; 2025-25, s. 112.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 11 cases, 1976–2013 · leading case: Anderson v. Pamlico Chem. Co., Inc., 470 F. Supp. 12 (E.D.N.C. 1977).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Anderson v. Pamlico Chem. Co., Inc., 470 F. Supp. 12 (E.D.N.C. 1977). · cites it 12× “COUNT I N.C.G.S. § 24-11, in relevant part, reads: *15 § 24-11.”

Harrell Oil Co. of Mount Airy v. Case, 543 S.E.2d 522 (N.C. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 5× “Defendants’ second and final argument is that the trial court erred in determining that plaintiff is entitled to interest on the principal amount due at the rate of 1.”

Nordic Bank PLC v. Trend Grp., Ltd., 619 F. Supp. 542 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). “In that decision, the court held that the readjustment of a debt was not an “extension of credit” within the meaning of § 24-11 of the North Carolina Retail Installment Sales Act, Chapter 25A, N.C.Gen.Stat. § 24-11. Relying on decisions of the North Carolina Supreme Court, the…”

United States v. P. Browne & Assocs., Inc., 751 F. Supp. 2d 813 (M.D.N.C. 2010). · cites it 2× “) Broadband points to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 24-11(a) (on revolving credit charges), which places an 18% per year cap upon certain “finance charges.”

Hyde Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Noland, 227 S.E.2d 169 (N.C. Ct. App. 1976). · cites it 3× “an insurance broker duly licensed in this State who extends credit to and only to his own policyholders may charge and collect finance charges or other fees at a periodic (monthly) rate as provided in G.S. 24-11 (a), after said amount has been outstanding for 30 days.”

Leonard E. Warner, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp., 311 S.E.2d 1 (N.C. Ct. App. 1984). “) Prior to the rules, an intervenor was forced to “take the case as he finds it,” meaning he could not enlarge on the issues then existing. This is no longer true. Once an intervenor becomes a party, he should be a party for all purposes.”

Gaynoe v. First Union Direct Bank, N.A., 2001 NCBC 01 (N.C. Bus. Ct. 2001). · cites it 3× “” N.C.G.S. § 24-11 (e) (1999) (emphasis applied).”

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Vandeusen, 155 B.R. 358 (E.D.N.C. 1993). · cites it 9× “One such statute is N.C.Gen.Stat. § 24-11(c), which imposes an additional limitation on Article 9 security interests.”

Farlow v. Brookbank, 749 S.E.2d 493 (N.C. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 18× “Inherbrief, Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred by denying her request for the assessment of interest at a rate of one and one-half percent per month (or eighteen percent per annum) pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 24-11 (a) rather than at the legal rate.”

In re Vandeusen, 147 B.R. 9 (E.D.N.C. 1992). · cites it 3× “24-11(c), not G.S. 24-11(a), limits the taking of a security interest.”

Harrington v. Overcash, 301 S.E.2d 528 (N.C. Ct. App. 1983). “Civil Practice and Procedure § 24-11 (1973), at page 212, says: Rule 24 is silent as to the extent an intervenor may participate in the action once the court allows him in as a party.”

— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 24-11(a) — 2 cases

United States v. P. Browne & Assocs., Inc., 751 F. Supp. 2d 813 (M.D.N.C. 2010). “) Broadband points to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 24-11(a) (on revolving credit charges), which places an 18% per year cap upon certain “finance charges.”

In re Vandeusen, 147 B.R. 9 (E.D.N.C. 1992). “24-11(c), not G.S. 24-11(a), limits the taking of a security interest.”

— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 24-11(c) — 2 cases

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Vandeusen, 155 B.R. 358 (E.D.N.C. 1993). “One such statute is N.C.Gen.Stat. § 24-11(c), which imposes an additional limitation on Article 9 security interests.”

In re Vandeusen, 147 B.R. 9 (E.D.N.C. 1992). “24-11(c), not G.S. 24-11(a), limits the taking of a security interest.”

— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 24-11(e) — 1 case

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Vandeusen, 155 B.R. 358 (E.D.N.C. 1993). “One such statute is N.C.Gen.Stat. § 24-11(c), which imposes an additional limitation on Article 9 security interests.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.