NC General Statutes
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 31-3.1 (2026)
Will invalid unless statutory requirements complied with
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NCLEGncleg.gov (official)
JustiaChapter 31
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
No will is valid unless it complies with the requirements of this Chapter. (1953, c. 1098, s. 2; 2025-33, s. 8.5.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2026 · leading case: In Re the Will of Priddy, 614 S.E.2d 454 (N.C. Ct. App. 2005).
In Re the Will of Priddy, 614 S.E.2d 454 (N.C. Ct. App. 2005). “N.C. Gen. Stat. § 31-3.1 (2003). Propounder has the initial burden of proof and must show that the paper-writing in question was executed with the proper formalities required by N.”
In Re the Purported Will of Shepherd, 761 S.E.2d 221 (N.C. Ct. App. 2014). “N.C. Gen. Stat. § 31-3.1 . “[T]he [c]lerk of the [s]uperior [c]ourt has the sole power in the first instance to determine whether a decedent died testate or intestate, and if he died testate, whether the script in dispute is his will.”
Leggett v. Rose, 776 F. Supp. 229 (E.D.N.C. 1991). “2d 352 (1940), N.C.Gen.Stat. § 31-3.1. However, Leggett contends that this failed codicil should be viewed as a contract to devise and, therefore, should be held to have conveyed the remaining 49% ownership in the vessels to Leggett.”
In re: Greenamyer (N.C. Ct. App. 2026). “3 governs the requirements for executing an attested will and states in full: (a) An attested written will is a written will signed by the testator and attested by at least two competent witnesses as provided by this section.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.