NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-508 (2026)

Telephonic communication authorized

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 7B CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

All communications, notices, orders, authorizations, and requests authorized or required by G.S. 7B-501, 7B-503, and 7B-504 may be made by telephone when other means of communication are impractical. A copy of the petition shall be provided to the judge or magistrate who is delegated authority by G.S. 7B-502 by any appropriate secure method, including hand delivery, fax, or encrypted electronic means, or through the court's electronic filing system. All written orders pursuant to telephonic communication shall bear the name and the title of the person requesting and receiving telephonic approval, the name and title of the judge or magistrate approving the initial nonsecure custody order, the signature and the title of the clerk or magistrate who accepted the petition for filing, and the hour and the date of the authorization.  (1979, c. 815, s. 1; 1981, c. 469, s. 13; 1987 (Reg. Sess., 1988), c. 1090, s. 4; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 27, s. 1; 1997-390, ss. 5, 6; 1998-202, s. 6; 1998-229, s. 4; 1999-456, s. 60; 2025-16, s. 1.7.)

 

Article 5A.

Safe Surrender of Infants.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2020–2020 · leading case: Kiziah v. Catawba Cnty. North Carolina (W.D.N.C. 2020).
Kiziah v. Catawba Cnty. North Carolina (W.D.N.C. 2020). · cites it 2× “”); N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-508 (stating that nonsecure custody orders may be issued by telephone when other means of communication are impractical).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.