The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and the Attorney General of North Carolina shall cooperate with federal and other State agencies in discharging their responsibilities concerning traffic in controlled substances and in suppressing the abuse of controlled substances. To this end, they are authorized to:
(1) Arrange for the exchange of information between governmental officials concerning the use and abuse of controlled substances;
(2) Coordinate and cooperate in training programs on controlled substances for law enforcement at the local and State levels;
(3) Cooperate with the Bureau by establishing a centralized unit which will accept, catalogue, file, and collect statistics, including records of drug-dependent persons and other controlled substance law offenders within the State, and make such information available for federal, State, and local law-enforcement purposes. Provided that neither the Attorney General of North Carolina, the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services nor any other State officer or agency shall be authorized to accept or file, or give out the names or other form of personal identification of drug-dependent persons who voluntarily seek treatment or assistance related to their drug dependency. (1971, c. 919, s. 1; 1977, c. 667, s. 3; 1997-443, s. 11A.118(a).)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
17
cases, 1953–1977 · leading case:
State v. Jackson, 187 S.E.2d 27 (N.C. 1972).
State v. Jackson, 187 S.E.2d 27 (N.C. 1972).
· cites it 9× “90-88 is set forth in G.S. 90-111. Section (a) of the latter statute provides a penalty for first violation by “any person” of not more than five years in prison.”
State v. Harvey, 187 S.E.2d 706 (N.C. 1972).
“90-88; G.S. 90-111. In the case of State v. Riera, 276 N.”
State v. Miller, 75 S.E.2d 242 (N.C. 1953).
· cites it 3× “G.S. 90-111 provides that “any person violating any provision of this article shall, upon conviction, be punished for the first offense by a fine not exceeding one thousand ($1,000.”
State v. Spencer, 187 S.E.2d 779 (N.C. 1972).
“§ 90-111. Penalties for violation, (a) Any person violating any provision of this article or any person who conspires, aids, abets, or procures others to do such acts, shall upon conviction be punished, for the first offense, by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars…”
State v. White, 99 S.E.2d 772 (N.C. 1957).
· cites it 2× “The court, therefore, proceeded to pronounce judgment as provided in G.S. 90-111 for subsequent offenses. Upon appeal to this Court we held that, “Where a statute prescribes a higher penalty in case of repeated convictions for similar offenses, an indictment for a subsequent…”
State v. Allen, 183 S.E.2d 680 (N.C. 1971).
“” G.S. 90-111 (c): “If the offense shall consist of the sale, barter, peddling, exchange, dispensing or supplying of marijuana or a narcotic drug to a minor by an adult in violation of any provision of this article, such person shall upon conviction be punished by a term of not…”
State v. Best, 233 S.E.2d 544 (N.C. 1977).
“G.S. 90-111 (Cum. Supp. 1969). Penalties for subsequent violations were higher.”
State v. Roberts, 171 S.E.2d 440 (N.C. 1970).
“” G.S. 90-111 (a) provides, “Any person violating any provision of this article * * * shall upon conviction be punished, for the first offense, by a fine of ■not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.”
State v. Long, 188 S.E.2d 690 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).
· cites it 2× “Former G.S. 90-111 (a) provided that any person violating any provision of Article 5 might be punished by fine or imprisonment, or both.”
State v. Cole, 199 S.E.2d 748 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).
· cites it 4× “The original recidivist provision of the Uniform Act contained the following language: “G.S. 90-111: Any person violating any provision of this Article shall, upon conviction, be punished for the first offense by a fine not exceeding one thousand ($1000) dollars, or by…”
Honeycutt v. Scheidt, 119 S.E.2d 777 (N.C. 1961).
“But a warrant or indictment for “a subsequent offense must allege facts showing that the offense charged is a second or subsequent crime within the contemplation of the statute in order to subject the accused to the higher penalty.”
State v. Smith, 186 S.E.2d 600 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).
“G.S. 90-111 (a). Under the new Act, a first offense of possession of any quantity of marijuana is punishable by imprisonment for a term of not more than six months or a fine of not more than $500.”
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-111(c): 1 case
State v. Jackson, 187 S.E.2d 27 (N.C. 1972).
“90-88 is set forth in G.S. 90-111. Section (a) of the latter statute provides a penalty for first violation by “any person” of not more than five years in prison.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.