N.C. Gen. Stat. » Chapter 90
NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-14.11 (2026)

Appeal; appeal bond

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 90 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Any party to the review proceeding, including the Board, may appeal from the decision of the superior court under rules of procedure applicable in other civil cases. No appeal bond shall be required of the Board. Subject to subsection (b) of this section, the appealing party may apply to the superior court for a stay of that court's decision or a stay of the Board's decision, whichever shall be appropriate, pending the outcome of the appeal.

(b) No stay shall be granted unless all parties are given prior notice and an opportunity to be heard in response to the application for an order staying the operation of the Board decision. (1953, c. 1248, s. 3; 1989, c. 770, s. 75.1; 1995, c. 405, s. 7.)

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1967–1989 · leading case: In Re Guess, 376 S.E.2d 8 (N.C. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Guess, 376 S.E.2d 8 (N.C. 1989). · cites it 16× “The Board appealed the decision to the Court of Appeals, which dismissed the appeal holding that appeal was directly to this Court pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 90-14.11. For the reasons stated hereinafter, we now reverse and hold that appeal lies of right to the Court of Appeals.”
In Re Guess, 382 S.E.2d 459 (N.C. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “2d 11 (1988), because G.S. 90-14.11, still in the books, directs that decisions of the North Carolina Board of Medical Examiners, after being reviewed by the Superior Court, be appealed to the Supreme Court, and because several years after G.”
In Re Kincheloe, 157 S.E.2d 833 (N.C. 1967). “” G.S. 90-14.11 authorizes any party, including the Board, to appeal to the Supreme Court from the decision of the Superior Court.”
In re Guess, 367 S.E.2d 11 (N.C. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “For in 1953, the General Assembly provided by G.S. 90-14.11 that upon any decision of the Board of Medical Examiners being reviewed by the Superior Court appeal could be taken “to the Supreme Court .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.