NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-151 (2026)

Discrimination

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 95 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No employer, employee, or any other person related to the  administration of this Article shall be discriminated against in any work, procedure, or employment by reason of sex, race, ethnic origin, or by reason of religious affiliation. (1973, c. 295, s. 26.)

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2005–2022 · leading case: Jarman v. Deason, 618 S.E.2d 776 (N.C. Ct. App. 2005).
Jarman v. Deason, 618 S.E.2d 776 (N.C. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 8× “N.C. Gen.Stat. § 95-151 (2003) (emphasis added).”
Bigelow v. Town of Chapel Hill, 745 S.E.2d 316 (N.C. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 4× “N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-151 states: “No employer, employee, or any other person related to the administration of this Article shall be discriminated against in any work, procedure, or employment by reason of sex, race, ethnic origin, or by reason of religious affiliation.”
Keener v. Universal Companies, Inc., 128 F. Supp. 3d 902 (M.D.N.C. 2015). · cites it 2× “If Plaintiff intended to cite N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-151 , which prohibits discrimination based on sex, race, and religious affiliation against any "employer, employee, or any *918 other person related to the administration” of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North…”
Green-Hayes v. Handcrafted Homes, LLC, 775 S.E.2d 695 (N.C. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “2d at 325 (citing N.C. Gen.Stat. § 95-151 (2011) ). Plaintiff's argument is, therefore, overruled.”
Hurtt v. The Town of Hope Mills (E.D.N.C. 2022). · cites it 2× “She cites to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-151 , which prohibits employment discrimination, and N.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.