(a) Any employer who violates the provisions of G.S. 95-25.3 (Minimum Wage), G.S. 95-25.4 (Overtime), or G.S. 95-25.6 through 95-25.12 (Wage Payment) shall be liable to the employee or employees affected in the amount of their unpaid minimum wages, their unpaid overtime compensation, or their unpaid amounts due under G.S. 95-25.6 through 95-25.12, as the case may be, plus interest at the legal rate set forth in G.S. 24-1, from the date each amount first came due.
(a1) In addition to the amounts awarded pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the court shall award liquidated damages in an amount equal to the amount found to be due as provided in subsection (a) of this section, provided that if the employer shows to the satisfaction of the court that the act or omission constituting the violation was in good faith and that the employer had reasonable grounds for believing that the act or omission was not a violation of this Article, the court may, in its discretion, award no liquidated damages or may award any amount of liquidated damages not exceeding the amount found due as provided in subsection (a) of this section.
(b) Action to recover such liability may be maintained in the General Court of Justice by any one or more employees.
(c) Action to recover such liability may also be maintained in the General Court of Justice by the Commissioner at the request of the employees affected. Any sums thus recovered by the Commissioner on behalf of an employee shall be held in a special deposit account and shall be paid directly to the employee or employees affected.
(d) The court, in any action brought under this Article may, in addition to any judgment awarded plaintiff, order costs and fees of the action and reasonable attorneys' fees to be paid by the defendant. In an action brought by the Commissioner in which a default judgment is entered, the clerk shall order attorneys' fees of three hundred dollars ($300.00) to be paid by the defendant.
The court may order costs and fees of the action and reasonable attorneys' fees to be paid by the plaintiff if the court determines that the action was frivolous.
(e) The Commissioner is authorized to determine and supervise the payment of the amounts due under this section, including interest at the legal rate set forth in G.S. 24-1, from the date each amount first came due, and the agreement to accept such amounts by the employee shall constitute a waiver of the employee's right to bring an action under subsection (b) of this section.
(f) Actions under this section must be brought within two years pursuant to G.S. 1-53.
(g) Prior to initiating any action under this section, the Commissioner shall exhaust all administrative remedies, including giving the employer the opportunity to be heard on the matters at issue and giving the employer notice of the pending action. (1959, c. 475; 1975, c. 413, s. 11; 1979, c. 839, s. 1; 1989, c. 687, s. 4; 1991, c. 298.)
Notes of Decisions
Garcia v. Frog Island Seafood, Inc., 644 F. Supp. 2d 696 (E.D.N.C. 2009).
· cites it 9× “§ 216 (b); see also N.C.G.S. § 95-25.22(a), (al) (explaining an employer shall be liable to the employee in the amount of unpaid minimum wages and interest plus an equal amount as liquidated damages).”
Kornegay v. Aspen Asset Grp., LLC, 693 S.E.2d 723 (N.C. Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 11× “See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22 (f) (2009). Defendants contend the statute began running when defendants notified plaintiff in the 27 June 2002 memo that they would not pay him any bonuses “until Aspen sees fit & confident we are making money.”
Hamilton v. Memorex Telex Corp., 454 S.E.2d 278 (N.C. Ct. App. 1995).
· cites it 13× “N.C.G.S. § 95-25.22, which addresses the recovery of unpaid wages, provides that: (a) Any employer who violates the provisions of .”
Morris v. Scenera Rsch., LLC, 747 S.E.2d 362 (N.C. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 13× “N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22 (al) (2011) (emphasis added).”
Amos v. Oakdale Knitting Co., 403 S.E.2d 565 (N.C. Ct. App. 1991).
· cites it 21× “N.C.G.S. § 95-25.22 provides that an employee may maintain an action in the General Court of Justice to recover unpaid minimum wages with interest thereon; that the court may in its discretion award exemplary damages in the amount of the recovery; and that the court may award…”
Laborers' Int'l Union v. Case Farms, Inc., 488 S.E.2d 632 (N.C. Ct. App. 1997).
· cites it 10× “The main issue in this case is whether the plaintiff unions have standing to bring suit on behalf of the plaintiff employees under the North Carolina Wage and Hour Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22 (1993). The Wage and Hour Act states that an action to recover unpaid wages “may be…”
Morris v. Scenera Rsch., LLC, 788 S.E.2d 154 (N.C. 2016).
· cites it 3× “N.C.G.S. § 95-25.22(al)(2015). Plaintiff argues that defendants committed a per se WHA violation that was unreasonable as a matter of law when they did not notify him that he would not receive the issuance bonuses when his employment ended.”
Luke v. Omega Consulting Grp., LC, 670 S.E.2d 604 (N.C. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 4× “N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22 (a) (2007). The trial court is only permitted to reduce the award of liquidated damages if “the employer had reasonable grounds for believing that the act or omission was not a violation of this Article[.”
Bartnikowski v. NVR, Inc., 307 F. App'x 730 (4th Cir. 2009).
· cites it 3× “See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22 (d) (2007). CAFA specifies that the amount in controversy should be calculated “exclusive of interests and costs.”
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22(a): 18 cases
Garcia v. Frog Island Seafood, Inc., 644 F. Supp. 2d 696 (E.D.N.C. 2009).
“§ 216 (b); see also N.C.G.S. § 95-25.22(a), (al) (explaining an employer shall be liable to the employee in the amount of unpaid minimum wages and interest plus an equal amount as liquidated damages).”
Amos v. Oakdale Knitting Co., 403 S.E.2d 565 (N.C. Ct. App. 1991).
“N.C.G.S. § 95-25.22 provides that an employee may maintain an action in the General Court of Justice to recover unpaid minimum wages with interest thereon; that the court may in its discretion award exemplary damages in the amount of the recovery; and that the court may award…”
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22(a1): 4 cases
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22(al): 5 cases
Garcia v. Frog Island Seafood, Inc., 644 F. Supp. 2d 696 (E.D.N.C. 2009).
“§ 216 (b); see also N.C.G.S. § 95-25.22(a), (al) (explaining an employer shall be liable to the employee in the amount of unpaid minimum wages and interest plus an equal amount as liquidated damages).”
Kornegay v. Aspen Asset Grp., LLC, 693 S.E.2d 723 (N.C. Ct. App. 2010).
“See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22 (f) (2009). Defendants contend the statute began running when defendants notified plaintiff in the 27 June 2002 memo that they would not pay him any bonuses “until Aspen sees fit & confident we are making money.”
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22(al)(2015): 1 case
Morris v. Scenera Rsch., LLC, 788 S.E.2d 154 (N.C. 2016).
“N.C.G.S. § 95-25.22(al)(2015). Plaintiff argues that defendants committed a per se WHA violation that was unreasonable as a matter of law when they did not notify him that he would not receive the issuance bonuses when his employment ended.”
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22(b): 2 cases
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22(b)(c): 1 case
Laborers' Int'l Union v. Case Farms, Inc., 488 S.E.2d 632 (N.C. Ct. App. 1997).
“The main issue in this case is whether the plaintiff unions have standing to bring suit on behalf of the plaintiff employees under the North Carolina Wage and Hour Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22 (1993). The Wage and Hour Act states that an action to recover unpaid wages “may be…”
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22(c): 1 case
Laborers' Int'l Union v. Case Farms, Inc., 488 S.E.2d 632 (N.C. Ct. App. 1997).
“The main issue in this case is whether the plaintiff unions have standing to bring suit on behalf of the plaintiff employees under the North Carolina Wage and Hour Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22 (1993). The Wage and Hour Act states that an action to recover unpaid wages “may be…”
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22(d): 12 cases
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22(e): 1 case
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22(f): 8 cases
Hamilton v. Memorex Telex Corp., 454 S.E.2d 278 (N.C. Ct. App. 1995).
“N.C.G.S. § 95-25.22, which addresses the recovery of unpaid wages, provides that: (a) Any employer who violates the provisions of .”
Bartnikowski v. NVR, Inc., 307 F. App'x 730 (4th Cir. 2009).
“See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-25.22 (d) (2007). CAFA specifies that the amount in controversy should be calculated “exclusive of interests and costs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.