N.C. Gen. Stat. » Chapter 95
NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-99 (2026)

Penalty for violation of Article

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 95 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any violation of the provisions of this Article is hereby declared to be a Class 1 misdemeanor. (1959, c. 742; 1993, c. 539, s. 667; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c).)

 

§ 95-100.  No provisions of Article 10 of Chapter 95 applicable to units of government or their employees.

The provisions of Article 10 of Chapter 95 of the General Statutes shall not apply to the State of North Carolina or any agency, institution, or instrumentality thereof or the employees of same nor shall the provisions of Article 10 of Chapter 95 of the General Statutes apply to any public employees or any employees of any town, city, county or other municipality or the agencies or instrumentalities thereof, nor shall said Article apply to employees of the State or any agencies, instrumentalities or institutions thereof or to any public employees whatsoever. (1959, c. 742.)

 

Article 13.

Payments to or for Benefit of Labor Organizations.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1969–1976 · leading case: Atkins v. City of Charlotte, 296 F. Supp. 1068 (W.D.N.C. 1969).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Atkins v. City of Charlotte, 296 F. Supp. 1068 (W.D.N.C. 1969). · cites it 15× “N.C.G.S. § 95-99: Penalty for violation of article.”
Winston-Salem/Forsyth Cnty. Unit of the North Carolina Ass'n of Educators v. Phillips, 381 F. Supp. 644 (M.D.N.C. 1974). · cites it 3× “§ 95-97, which prohibited fire 'fighting employees of a governmental unit from becoming members of or from assisting a labor organization which was affiliated with a national or international labor organization that had collective bargaining as one of its purposes, and N.C.G.S.…”
State v. Martin, 226 S.E.2d 682 (N.C. Ct. App. 1976). “, Criminal Law, §§ 95-99. And finally, the meaning of the sentence relied on by defendant is unclear and susceptible of various constructions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.