N.D. Cent. Code » Title 39 · Chapter 39-06
North Dakota Century Code

N.D. Cent. Code § 39-06-30 (2026)

Conviction - Meaning and effect

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ND-LEGndlegis.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Repealed by S.L. 2013, ch. 291, § 62.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1972–2018 · leading case: Holen v. Hjelle, 396 N.W.2d 290 (N.D. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Holen v. Hjelle, 396 N.W.2d 290 (N.D. 1986). · cites it 12× “The district court determined that the Montana conviction was not a “conviction” as defined in Section 39-06-30, N.D.C.C., and the hearing officer therefore could not rely upon the photostatic copy provisions of Section 39-06-27, N.”
State v. Ellis, 2001 ND 84, 625 N.W.2d 544. · cites it 4× “See N.D.C.C. § 39-06-30. 1 The definition of a conviction for purposes of the reporting requirements of Title 39, N.”
Bienek v. Dep't of Transp., 2007 ND 117, 736 N.W.2d 492. · cites it 6× “” However, under N.D.C.C. § 39-06-30, “conviction” is defined as “a final order or judgment of *496 conviction by the North Dakota supreme court, any lower court having jurisdiction, a tribal court, or a court in another state.”
State v. Skarsgard, 2007 ND 159, 740 N.W.2d 64. · cites it 4× “Specifically, Skarsgard argues criminal judgments on appeal to this Court are not “convictions” as that term is defined in N.D.C.C. § 39-06-30 and therefore cannot be used.”
State v. Brown, 2018 ND 31, 906 N.W.2d 120. · cites it 2× “2d 64 (discussing similar language in now repealed version of N.D.C.C. § 39-06-30, which was reenacted in N.”
State v. Harm, 200 N.W.2d 387 (N.D. 1972). · cites it 4× “On May 13, 1969, the commissioner received a report that Harm had forfeited bail, which is the equivalent to a conviction (Section 39-06-30, N.D.C.C.), on a careless driving charge for which he was cited on April 29, 1969.”
City of Minot v. Mattern, 449 N.W.2d 560 (N.D. 1989). · cites it 6× “Section 39-06-30, N.D.C.C., provides in part: “For purposes of this title the term ‘conviction’ means a final order or judgment of conviction .”
Hamre v. North Dakota Dep't of Transp., 2014 ND 23, 842 N.W.2d 865. · cites it 6× “2-02(8) (2011) was in direct conflict with N.D.C.C. § 39-06-30 (2011), now repealed, limiting convictions to a final order or judgment of conviction by a court.”
Kosmatka v. Saf. Responsibility Div. of the North Dakota State High. Dep't, 196 N.W.2d 402 (N.D. 1972). “Comparing §§ 39-06-28 and 39-06-31, N.D. C.C., in the light of the fundamental principle enunciated above, it would be anomalous to require the trial court to forward the operator’s license immediately if § 39-06-31 does not allow the license to be revoked until the appellate…”
Weigel v. Weigel, 2007 ND 110. · cites it 6× “” However, under N.D.C.C. § 39-06-30, “conviction” is defined as “a final order or judgment of conviction by the North Dakota supreme court, any lower court having jurisdiction, a tribal court, or a court in another state .”
Langer v. North Dakota State High. Comm'r, 409 N.W.2d 635 (N.D. 1987). · cites it 2× “nt part: “The commissioner may suspend or revoke the license of any resident of this state or the privilege of a nonresident to drive a motor vehicle in this state upon *636 receiving notice of the conviction of such person in another state of an offense therein which, if…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.