No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sharp
v.
Eckle, Supt.
v.
Eckle, Supt.
No. 36692.
Ohio Supreme Court.
May 24, 1961.
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 279
Mr. Paul N. Sharp, in propria persona.
, Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. Aubrey A. Wendt, for respondent.
Bell, Fourth, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Place, Radcliee, Stead, Taet, Weygandt, Zimmerman.
Published
Per Curiam.
Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to review the alleged errors of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J,