Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 101
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 101.15 (2026)

Public committee meetings

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
September 5, 2001
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 94 - 124th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

(A) As used in this section:

(1) "Caucus" means all of the members of either house of the general assembly who are members of the same political party.

(2) "Committee" means any committee of either house of the general assembly, a joint committee of both houses of the general assembly, including a committee of conference, or a subcommittee of any committee listed in division (A)(2) of this section.

(3) "Meeting" means any prearranged discussion of the public business of a committee by a majority of its members.

(B) Except as otherwise provided in division (F) of this section, all meetings of any committee are declared to be public meetings open to the public at all times. The secretary assigned to the chairperson of the committee shall prepare, file, and maintain the minutes of every regular or special meeting of a committee. The committee, at its next regular or special meeting, shall approve the minutes prepared, filed, and maintained by the secretary, or, if the minutes prepared, filed, and maintained by the secretary require correction before their approval, the committee shall correct and approve the minutes at the next following regular or special meeting. The committee shall make the minutes available for public inspection not later than seven days after the meeting the minutes reflect or not later than the committee's next regular or special meeting, whichever occurs first.

(C) Each committee shall establish a reasonable method whereby any person may determine the time and place of all regularly scheduled meetings and the time, place, and purpose of all special meetings. No committee shall hold a regular or special meeting unless it gives at least twenty-four hours' advance notice to the news media that have requested notification.

The method established by each committee shall provide that, upon request and payment of a reasonable fee, any person may obtain reasonable advance notification of all meetings at which any specific type of public business will be discussed. Provisions for advance notification may include, but are not limited to, mailing the agenda of meetings to all subscribers on a mailing list or mailing notices in self-addressed stamped envelopes provided by the person who desires advance notification.

(D) Any action of a committee relating to a bill or resolution, or any other formal action of a committee, is invalid unless taken in an open meeting of the committee. Any action of a committee relating to a bill or resolution, or any other formal action of a committee, taken in an open meeting is invalid if it results from deliberations in a meeting not open to the public.

(E)(1) Any person may bring an action to enforce this section. An action under this division shall be brought within two years after the date of the alleged violation or threatened violation. Upon proof of a violation or threatened violation of this section in an action brought by any person, the court of common pleas shall issue an injunction to compel the members of the committee to comply with its provisions.

(2)(a) If the court of common pleas issues an injunction under division (E)(1) of this section, the court shall order the committee that it enjoins to pay a civil forfeiture of five hundred dollars to the party that sought the injunction and shall award to that party all court costs and, subject to reduction as described in this division, reasonable attorney's fees. The court, in its discretion, may reduce an award of attorney's fees to the party that sought the injunction or not award attorney's fees to that party if the court determines both of the following:

(i) That, based on the ordinary application of statutory law and case law as it existed at the time of the violation or threatened violation that was the basis of the injunction, a well-informed committee reasonably would believe that the committee was not violating or threatening to violate this section;

(ii) That a well-informed committee reasonably would believe that the conduct or threatened conduct that was the basis of the injunction would serve the public policy that underlies the authority that is asserted as permitting that conduct or threatened conduct.

(b) If the court of common pleas does not issue an injunction under division (E)(1) of this section and the court determines at that time that the bringing of the action was frivolous conduct as defined in division (A) of section 2323.51 of the Revised Code, the court shall award to the committee all court costs and reasonable attorney's fees, as determined by the court.

(3) Irreparable harm and prejudice to the party that sought the injunction shall be conclusively and irrebuttably presumed upon proof of a violation or threatened violation of this section.

(4) A member of a committee who knowingly violates an injunction issued under division (E)(1) of this section may be removed from office by an action brought in the court of common pleas for that purpose by the prosecuting attorney of Franklin county or by the attorney general.

(5) The remedies described in divisions (E)(1) to (4) of this section shall be the exclusive remedies for a violation of this section.

(F) This section does not apply to or affect either of the following:

(1) All meetings of the joint legislative ethics committee created under section 101.34 of the Revised Code other than a meeting that is held for any of the following purposes:

(a) To consider the adoption, amendment, or recission of any rule that the joint legislative ethics committee is authorized to adopt pursuant to division (B)(11) of section 101.34, division (E) of section 101.78, division (B) of section 102.02, or division (E) of section 121.68 of the Revised Code;

(b) To discuss and consider changes to any administrative operation of the joint legislative ethics committee other than any matter described in division (G) of section 121.22 of the Revised Code;

(c) To discuss pending or proposed legislation.

(2) Meetings of a caucus.

(G) For purposes of division (F)(1)(a) of this section, an advisory opinion, written opinion, or decision relative to a complaint is not a rule.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1995–2025 · leading case: State ex rel. DiFranco v. S. Euclid (Slip Opinion), 2015 Ohio 4915 (Ohio 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. DiFranco v. S. Euclid (Slip Opinion), 2015 Ohio 4915 (Ohio 2015). · cites it 2× “51 sets a 30-day time limit from the date of final judgment in which a party may move for sanctions: (B)(1) Subject to divisions (B)(2) and (3), (C), and (D) of this section and except as otherwise provided in division (E)(2)(b) of section 101.15 or division (I)(2)(b) of section…”
Bear v. Troyer, 2016 Ohio 3363 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “51(B)(1) provides: “Subject to divisions (B)(2) and (3), (C), and (D) of this section and except as otherwise provided in division (E)(2)(b) of section 101.15 or division (I)(2)(b) of section 121.”
Motorists Mut. Ins. v. Brandenburg, 648 N.E.2d 488 (Ohio 1995). “09 is statutory authorization for the award of attorney fees where the statute does not use the words “attorney fees”; in no less than sixty-six other sections of the Revised Code that do authorize attorney fees, those specific words appear in the statutory grant.”
Bernadine Kent v. Ohio House of Representatives, 33 F.4th 359 (6th Cir. 2022). “Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 101.15 (A)(1). Ohio law also recognizes these caucuses’ political nature, exempting them from the state’s open-meetings requirement and allowing them to engage in political strategizing and goal-setting in private.”
Helfrich v. Madison, 2012 Ohio 3701 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “The current version of the statute provides in pertinent part: {¶46} “(B)(1) Subject to divisions (B)(2) and (3), (C), and (D) of this section and except as otherwise provided in division (E)(2)(b) of section 101.15 or division (I)(2)(b) of section 121.”
Classic Comfort Heating & Supply, L.L.C. v. Miller, 2022 Ohio 855 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “22 of the Revised Code, at any time not more than thirty days after the entry of final judgment in a civil action or appeal, any party adversely affected by frivolous conduct may file a motion for an award of court costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and other reasonable expenses…”
Helfrich v. Madison, 2014 Ohio 1928 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “51, governs the award of attorney fees, and reads in pertinent part, {¶42} "(B)(1) Subject to divisions (B)(2) and (3), (C), and (D) of this section and except as otherwise provided in division (E)(2)(b) of section 101.15 or division (I)(2)(b) of section 121.”
Vercellotti v. Husted, 883 N.E.2d 1112 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 18× “Appellants argue that the House’s action on the bill should be declared invalid because the committee violated R.C. 101.15 by holding a meeting that was closed to the public during a recess of the committee’s hearing on March 28, 2006.”
King v. Pattison, 2016 Ohio 4785 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “{¶13} Subsection (B)(1) states: Subject to divisions (B)(2) and (3), (C), and (D) of this section and except as otherwise provided in division (E)(2)(b) of section 101.15 or division (I)(2)(b) of section 121.”
Shields v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp., 2024 Ohio 2901 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “51(B)(1) provides the time for the filing of a motion as follows: Subject to divisions (B)(2) and (3), (C), and (D) of this section and except as otherwise provided in division (E)(2)(b) of section 101.15 or division (I)(2)(b) of section 121.”
Payson v. Phipps, 2022 Ohio 1525 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “51(B)(1) and (2) were amended to their current form, which states as follows: (B)(1) Subject to divisions (B)(2) and (3), (C), and (D) of this section and except as otherwise provided in division (E)(2)(b) of section 101.15 or division (I)(2)(b) of section 121.”
Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. v. Brandenburg, 1995 Ohio 281 (Ohio 1995). “09 is statutory authorization for the award of attorney fees where the statute does not use the words "attorney fees"; in no less than sixty-six other sections of the Revised Code that do authorize attorney fees, those specific words appear in the statutory grant.”
Show all 20 citing cases →
Ohio Rev. Code § 101.15(A)(1): 1 case
Kent v. Ohio House of Representatives Democratic Caucus (S.D. Ohio 2021).
Ohio Rev. Code § 101.15(A)(3): 1 case
Vercellotti v. Husted, 883 N.E.2d 1112 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008). “Appellants argue that the House’s action on the bill should be declared invalid because the committee violated R.C. 101.15 by holding a meeting that was closed to the public during a recess of the committee’s hearing on March 28, 2006.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 101.15(B): 1 case
Vercellotti v. Husted, 883 N.E.2d 1112 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008). “Appellants argue that the House’s action on the bill should be declared invalid because the committee violated R.C. 101.15 by holding a meeting that was closed to the public during a recess of the committee’s hearing on March 28, 2006.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 101.15(E)(2)(a): 2 cases
Motorists Mut. Ins. v. Brandenburg, 648 N.E.2d 488 (Ohio 1995). “09 is statutory authorization for the award of attorney fees where the statute does not use the words “attorney fees”; in no less than sixty-six other sections of the Revised Code that do authorize attorney fees, those specific words appear in the statutory grant.”
Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. v. Brandenburg, 1995 Ohio 281 (Ohio 1995). “09 is statutory authorization for the award of attorney fees where the statute does not use the words "attorney fees"; in no less than sixty-six other sections of the Revised Code that do authorize attorney fees, those specific words appear in the statutory grant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.