Notes of Decisions
Slone v. Lassiter (In Re Grove-Merritt), 406 B.R. 778 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2009).
· cites it 24× “The Defendant Has Failed to Establish Affirmative Defenses Under § 548(c), ORC § 1336.08, and § 550(e) While the Defendant has argued that he is entitled to the protection of the affirmative defenses of having provided value to the Debtor in exchange for or subsequent to the…”
Bates Recycling, Inc. v. Conaway, 2018 Ohio 5056 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 8× “{¶ 13} R.C. 1336.08(A) provides a defense for good faith purchasers against liability for a fraudulent conveyance and reads as follows: (A) A transfer or an obligation is not fraudulent under division (A)(1) of section 1336.”
Premier Therapy, L.L.C v. Childs, 2016 Ohio 7934 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 6× “08 provides in part: (B)(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, to the extent a transfer is voidable in an action by a creditor or a child support enforcement agency under division (A)(1) of section 1336.07 of the Revised Code, the creditor or agency may recover a…”
Rieser v. Hayslip (In Re Canyon Sys. Corp.), 343 B.R. 615 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2006).
· cites it 5× “See Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 1336.08. The Trustee did not seek summary judgment as to the availability of this defense to the Defendants.”
UBS Fin. servs., Inc. v. Lacava, 2018 Ohio 3165 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 8× “R.C. 1336.08 {¶45} In its fourth assignment of error, AIM argues that the trial court erred in applying R.”
Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co. v. Choice Title Agency, Inc., 2012 Ohio 2824 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 10× “{¶11} A creditor does not need to prove intent on the part of the transferee to establish a claim for fraudulent conveyance, but transferees may prove defenses to the claim and assert their rights as described in R.C. 1336.08. See Ford v. Star Bank, N.A.”
Aristocrat Lakewood Nursing Home v. Mayne, 729 N.E.2d 768 (Ohio Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 3× “R.C. 1336.08 specifically limits the recovery by a creditor under such circumstances and provides: “(B)(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, to the extent a transfer is voidable in an action by a creditor under division (A)(1) of 1336.”
UBS Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Lacava, 2018 Ohio 3276 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 5× “07, first in applying the limitations of R.C. 1336.08. VI. The trial court made plain error by violating the doctrine of separation of powers, not following the statutory language that is limited to one (1) of the remedies listed in (A)(1) in R.”
Individual Bus. Servs. v. Carmack, 2013 Ohio 4819 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 5× “{¶ 42} R.C. 1336.08 (B) provides guidance regarding the compensation due a creditor harmed by a fraudulent transfer.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 1336.08(A) — 20 cases
Bates Recycling, Inc. v. Conaway, 2018 Ohio 5056 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
“{¶ 13} R.C. 1336.08(A) provides a defense for good faith purchasers against liability for a fraudulent conveyance and reads as follows: (A) A transfer or an obligation is not fraudulent under division (A)(1) of section 1336.”
Slone v. Lassiter (In Re Grove-Merritt), 406 B.R. 778 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2009).
“The Defendant Has Failed to Establish Affirmative Defenses Under § 548(c), ORC § 1336.08, and § 550(e) While the Defendant has argued that he is entitled to the protection of the affirmative defenses of having provided value to the Debtor in exchange for or subsequent to the…”
Premier Therapy, L.L.C v. Childs, 2016 Ohio 7934 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
“08 provides in part: (B)(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, to the extent a transfer is voidable in an action by a creditor or a child support enforcement agency under division (A)(1) of section 1336.07 of the Revised Code, the creditor or agency may recover a…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 1336.08(B) — 8 cases
Premier Therapy, L.L.C v. Childs, 2016 Ohio 7934 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
“08 provides in part: (B)(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, to the extent a transfer is voidable in an action by a creditor or a child support enforcement agency under division (A)(1) of section 1336.07 of the Revised Code, the creditor or agency may recover a…”
UBS Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Lacava, 2018 Ohio 3276 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
“07, first in applying the limitations of R.C. 1336.08. VI. The trial court made plain error by violating the doctrine of separation of powers, not following the statutory language that is limited to one (1) of the remedies listed in (A)(1) in R.”
Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co. v. Choice Title Agency, Inc., 2012 Ohio 2824 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
“{¶11} A creditor does not need to prove intent on the part of the transferee to establish a claim for fraudulent conveyance, but transferees may prove defenses to the claim and assert their rights as described in R.C. 1336.08. See Ford v. Star Bank, N.A.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 1336.08(B)(1) — 6 cases
UBS Fin. servs., Inc. v. Lacava, 2018 Ohio 3165 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
“R.C. 1336.08 {¶45} In its fourth assignment of error, AIM argues that the trial court erred in applying R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 1336.08(B)(1)(a) — 3 cases
UBS Fin. servs., Inc. v. Lacava, 2018 Ohio 3165 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
“R.C. 1336.08 {¶45} In its fourth assignment of error, AIM argues that the trial court erred in applying R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 1336.08(B)(1)(b) — 1 case
UBS Fin. servs., Inc. v. Lacava, 2018 Ohio 3165 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
“R.C. 1336.08 {¶45} In its fourth assignment of error, AIM argues that the trial court erred in applying R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 1336.08(B)(2) — 1 case
Individual Bus. Servs. v. Carmack, 2013 Ohio 4819 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
“{¶ 42} R.C. 1336.08 (B) provides guidance regarding the compensation due a creditor harmed by a fraudulent transfer.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 1336.08(C) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 1336.08(E)(2) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.