Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 1341
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 1341.01 (2026)

Qualifications of sureties

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
October 1, 1953
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 1 - 100th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

Sureties must be residents of this state and worth, in the aggregate, double the sum to be secured, beyond the amount of their debts, and have property liable to execution in this state equal to the sum to be secured.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2025–2026 · leading case: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Gallabrese, 2025 Ohio 733 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Gallabrese, 2025 Ohio 733 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “Citing an article allegedly obtained from the bank’s website about an Ohio headquarters renovation, Appellant argued Ohio law sets a maximum annual interest rate of 8% and any contracted rate over this would be considered usurious under R.C. 1341.01(A).1 {¶13} On July 25, 2024,…”
Wintersville v. Bates, 2026 Ohio 417 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “Wintersville Ordinance Section 1341.01(e)(f). {¶23} The Village notes that, at the hearing, its engineer testified that Bates’ house could not exist without the wall.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 1341.01(A): 1 case
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Gallabrese, 2025 Ohio 733 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “Citing an article allegedly obtained from the bank’s website about an Ohio headquarters renovation, Appellant argued Ohio law sets a maximum annual interest rate of 8% and any contracted rate over this would be considered usurious under R.C. 1341.01(A).1 {¶13} On July 25, 2024,…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 1341.01(e)(f): 1 case
Wintersville v. Bates, 2026 Ohio 417 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026). “Wintersville Ordinance Section 1341.01(e)(f). {¶23} The Village notes that, at the hearing, its engineer testified that Bates’ house could not exist without the wall.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.