Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 140.051 (2026)

Contracts regarding certain hospital facilities exempt from competitive bidding

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If the costs of the hospital facilities are to be paid with funds derived from revenue obligations issued pursuant to section 140.06 of the Revised Code and with other funds derived from the nonprofit hospital agency, a public hospital agency, pursuant to negotiation and in the manner determined in its sole discretion by the governing body of the public hospital agency, may enter into a contract for the acquisition, construction, improvement, equipment, or furnishing of a hospital facility that is to be leased pursuant to section 140.05 of the Revised Code by a public hospital agency to a nonprofit hospital agency. Any requirement of competitive bidding, other restriction, or other procedures that are imposed on a public hospital agency with respect to contracts is not applicable to any contract entered into pursuant to this section.

A hospital facility is not exempt from applicable zoning, planning, and building regulations by reason of being financed from the proceeds of obligations issued pursuant to this chapter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1985–2020 · leading case: Hoover v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 482 N.E.2d 575 (Ohio 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hoover v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 482 N.E.2d 575 (Ohio 1985). · cites it 6× “109 was originally introduced to the Senate of the 113th General Assembly on March 14,1979 to amend R.C. 2919.21 and to enact R.”
Episcopal Ret. Homes, Inc. v. Ohio Dep't of Indus. Relations, 575 N.E.2d 134 (Ohio 1991). “Finally, R.C. 140.051 specifically states that “ * * * [a]ny requirement of competitive bidding, other restriction, or other procedures that are imposed on *372 a public hospital agency with respect to contracts is not applicable to any contract entered into pursuant to this…”
Youngstown City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. State (Slip Opinion), 2020-Ohio-2903, 161 N.E.3d 483. “2d 575 (1985), a taxpayer claimed that a bill by which R.C. 140.051 was enacted violated the Constitution’s three-consideration rule.”
Episcopal Ret. Homes v. Dept. of Indus. Rel., 2 Ohio App. Unrep. 23 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 5× “Chapter 140 revenue bonds are otherwise exempt from the requirements or restrictions of Ohio's prevailing-wage law pursuant to R.C. 140.051. This assignment is overruled.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.