(A) "Killed in the line of duty" means either of the following:
(1) Death in the line of duty;
(2) Death from injury sustained in the line of duty, including heart attack or other fatal injury or illness caused while in the line of duty.
(B) "Totally and permanently disabled" means unable to engage in any substantial gainful employment for a period of not less than twelve months by reason of a medically determinable physical impairment that is permanent or presumed to be permanent.
(C) "Volunteer peace officer" means any person who is employed as a police officer, sheriff's deputy, constable, or deputy marshal in a part-time, reserve, or volunteer capacity by a county sheriff's department or the police department of a municipal corporation, township, township police district, or joint police district and is not either of the following:
(1) A member of the public employees retirement system, Ohio police and fire pension fund, state highway patrol retirement system, or the Cincinnati retirement system;
(2) A retirant as defined in section 145.01 of the Revised Code.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33
cases, 1954–2013 · leading case: Anderson v. Minter, 291 N.E.2d 457 (Ohio 1972).
Anderson v. Minter, 291 N.E.2d 457 (Ohio 1972). · cites it 4ד27 reads, in pertinent part: “The tenure of every officer or employee in the classified service of the state and the counties, cities, city health districts, general health districts, and city school districts thereof, holding a position under Sections 143.01 to 143.48,…”
Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Health v. Lipson O'Shea Legal Grp., 2013 Ohio 5736 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2ד{¶28} In its opinion granting the BOH summary judgment, the trial court determined that all the requested documents, including those that contained only non-identifying information, were exempt from disclosure under R.C. 143.01(A)(1)(v) because their release was prohibited by R.”
State ex rel. Specht v. Oregon City Bd. of Educ., 420 N.E.2d 1004 (Ohio 1981). “* * * Sections 143.01 to 143.48, inclusive, of the Revised Code do not limit the power of an appointing authority to suspend without pay, for purposes of discipline, an employee for a reasonable period not exceeding thirty days***” (Emphasis added.”
State Ex Rel. Linder v. Troy Civil Serv. Comm'n, 194 N.E.2d 778 (Ohio Ct. App. 1963). · cites it 7דThe method of examination for promotions, the manner of giving notice thereof, and the rules governing the same shall be in general the same as those provided for original examinations, except as otherwise provided in Sections 143.01 to 143.48, inclusive, of the Revised Code.”
Gates v. Bd. of Educ. of River Local Sch. Dist., 228 N.E.2d 298 (Ohio 1967). ““In all school districts wherein the provisions of Sections 143.01 to 143.48, inclusive, of the Revised Code do not apply the following employment contract system shall control for employees whose contracts of employment are not otherwise provided by law: “(A) Employees, with at…”
Hauschild v. City of Cleveland, 147 N.E.2d 127 (Ohio Ct. App. 1958). “, the Civil Service Commission of Cleveland is authorized to prescribe, amend, and enforce rules not inconsistent with §§143.01 to 143.48, inclusive, R. C., for the classification of positions in the Civil Service of the City of Cleveland, for examinations, resignations, for…”
Sullivan v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 131 N.E.2d 611 (Ohio Ct. App. 1956). “, dealing with “Civil Service” provides: “The tenure of every officer or employee in the classified service of the state and the counties, cities, and city school districts thereof, holding a position under §143.01 to 143.48, inclusive, R. C., shall be during good behavior and…”
State ex rel. Mullin v. City of Mansfield, 269 N.E.2d 602 (Ohio 1971). “27 provides, in pertinent part: “The tenure of every officer or employee in the classified service of the state and the counties, cities, city health districts, general health districts, and city school districts thereof, holding a position under Sections 143.01 to 143.48,…”
Henslee v. State Pers. Bd. of Review, 239 N.E.2d 121 (Ohio Ct. App. 1968). · cites it 2דWe observe that on the stipulations made it would appear that the Director of the Office of Opportunity was not the “appointing authority” within the definition of Section 143.01 (D), Revised Code, for positions in the Governor’s office.”
State, Ex Rel. Click v. Thormyer, 151 N.E.2d 246 (Ohio Ct. App. 1958). “This section provides in part as follows: “The tenure of every officer or employee in the classified service of the state and the counties, cities, and city school districts thereof, holding a position under §§143.01 to 143.48, inclusive, R. C., shall be during good behavior and…”
Ohio Ass'n of Pub. Sch. Employees v. Bd. of Educ., 275 N.E.2d 610 (Ohio 1971). · cites it 2ד088 sets forth the employment rights of educational aides as follows: “ ‘Educational aides employed by a board of education shall have all rights, benefits, and legal protection available to other nonteaching employees in the school district, except that provisions of Sections…”
Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Health v. Lipson O'Shea Legal Grp., 2013 Ohio 5736 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). “{¶28} In its opinion granting the BOH summary judgment, the trial court determined that all the requested documents, including those that contained only non-identifying information, were exempt from disclosure under R.C. 143.01(A)(1)(v) because their release was prohibited by R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.