(A) A public employees retirement system is hereby created for the public employees of the state and of the several local authorities mentioned in section 145.01 of the Revised Code. Except as provided in division (B) of this section, membership in the system is compulsory upon being employed and shall continue as long as public employment continues.
(B) A student who is not a member at the time of his employment with the school, college, or university in which he is enrolled and regularly attending classes may elect to be exempted from compulsory membership and a student who is a member may elect to have his employment with the school, college, or university in which he is enrolled and regularly attending classes exempted from contribution to the retirement system. An election to be exempted from membership or contribution shall be made by signing a written application for exemption within the first month after being employed and filing the application with the public employees retirement board. All applications, when approved by the public employees retirement board and filed with the employer, shall be irrevocable while the employee is continuously employed by the school, college, or university and regularly attending classes.
State ex rel. Domhoff v. Ohio Pub. Emps. Ret. Sys. Bd. (Slip Opinion), 2014-Ohio-3688, 17 N.E.3d 569. · cites it 11דOne of the few exceptions to public-employee membership in OPERS is described in R.C. 145.03. That statute provides that a student employee is exempt from OPERS membership if he or she requests exemption by submitting a form to OPERS, OPERS approves the exemption, and the…”
State Ex Rel. Schachter v. Ohio Pub. Employees Ret. Bd., 2009-Ohio-1704, 905 N.E.2d 1210. · cites it 2דR.C. 145.03(A) {¶ 50} Schachter further asserts that res judicata cannot be used to bar her membership in PERS because its application conflicts with R.”
McAuliffe v. Bd. of Pub. Employees Ret. Sys., 638 N.E.2d 617 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1994). · cites it 6ד03(A), he “became” a public employee in 1975 by virtue of his employment with Pickerington and that his membership “shall continue” after that, regardless of any amendment to R.C. 145.03 in 1975. He maintains that though contractual employees were excluded from membership from…”
State ex rel. Ryan v. State Teachers Ret. Sys., 643 N.E.2d 1122 (Ohio 1994). · cites it 2ד22, which provides: *365 “(A)(1) * * * [A] member of the state teachers retirement system with at least eighteen months of contributing service in the system, the public employees retirement system, or the school employees retirement system who exempted himself from membership…”
State ex rel. Gill v. Sch. Emps. Ret. Sys. of Ohio, 2009-Ohio-1358, 121 Ohio St. 3d 567. · cites it 2ד{¶ 25} For the following reasons, SERS did not abuse its discretion in determining that once PERS approved and began disbursing an independent PERS benefit to Gill without regard to his SERS service, SERS lacked authority to modify the retirement award by acting on Gill’s…”
State ex rel. Van Dyke v. Pub. Employees Ret. Bd., 99 Ohio St. 3d 430 (Ohio 2003). “See, also, R.C. 145.03(A) (“membership in the system is compulsory upon being employed and shall continue as long as public employment continues”).”
Ohio Pub. Employees Ret. Sys. v. Coursen, 806 N.E.2d 197 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 2004). · cites it 2דR.C. 145.03 creates the “public employees retirement system * * * for the public employees of the state[.”
Berge v. Columbus Cmty. Cable Access, 736 N.E.2d 517 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1999). “CCCA’s simple receipt of a significant amount of money for its operation from the city does not turn the city into the employer of CCCA’s employees, nor does it mean that the city was acting directly or indirectly in the interest of CCCA. Further, plaintiff did not present any…”
State Ex Rel. Schachter v. Ohio Pub. Employees Ret. Bd., 2009-Ohio-1704, 905 N.E.2d 1210. “R.C. 145.03(A) {¶ 50} Schachter further asserts that res judicata cannot be used to bar her membership in PERS because its application conflicts with R.”
State ex rel. Gill v. Sch. Emps. Ret. Sys. of Ohio, 2009-Ohio-1358, 121 Ohio St. 3d 567. “{¶ 25} For the following reasons, SERS did not abuse its discretion in determining that once PERS approved and began disbursing an independent PERS benefit to Gill without regard to his SERS service, SERS lacked authority to modify the retirement award by acting on Gill’s…”
State ex rel. Van Dyke v. Pub. Employees Ret. Bd., 99 Ohio St. 3d 430 (Ohio 2003). “See, also, R.C. 145.03(A) (“membership in the system is compulsory upon being employed and shall continue as long as public employment continues”).”
McAuliffe v. Bd. of Pub. Employees Ret. Sys., 638 N.E.2d 617 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1994). “03(A), he “became” a public employee in 1975 by virtue of his employment with Pickerington and that his membership “shall continue” after that, regardless of any amendment to R.C. 145.03 in 1975. He maintains that though contractual employees were excluded from membership from…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 145.03(B): 1 case
State ex rel. Domhoff v. Ohio Pub. Emps. Ret. Sys. Bd. (Slip Opinion), 2014-Ohio-3688, 17 N.E.3d 569. “One of the few exceptions to public-employee membership in OPERS is described in R.C. 145.03. That statute provides that a student employee is exempt from OPERS membership if he or she requests exemption by submitting a form to OPERS, OPERS approves the exemption, and the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.