Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 147.52 (2026)

Notarial acts by authorized person

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) If the notarial act is performed by any of the persons described in divisions (A) and (B) of section 147.51 of the Revised Code, other than a person authorized to perform notarial acts by the laws or regulations of a foreign country, the signature, rank, or title and serial number, if any, of the person are sufficient proof of the authority of a holder of that rank or title to perform the act. Further proof of the person's authority is not required.

(B) If the notarial act is performed by a person authorized by the laws or regulations of a foreign country to perform the act, there is sufficient proof of the authority of that person to act if:

(1) Either a foreign service officer of the United States residing in the country in which the act is performed or a diplomatic or consular officer of the foreign country residing in the United States certifies that a person holding that office is authorized to perform the act;

(2) The official seal of the person performing the notarial act is affixed to the document; or

(3) The title and indication of authority to perform notarial acts of the person appears either in a digest of foreign law or in a list customarily used as a source of such information.

(C) If the notarial act is performed by a person other than one described in divisions (A) and (B) of this section, there is sufficient proof of the authority of that person to act if the clerk of a court of record in the place in which the notarial act is performed certifies to the official character of that person and to that person's authority to perform the notarial act.

(D) The signature and title of the person performing the act are prima-facie evidence that the person is a person with the designated title and that the signature is genuine.

Last updated February 19, 2025 at 9:37 AM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2009–2012 · leading case: Hazlett v. Chase Home Fin., LLC (In Re Nowak), 414 B.R. 269 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hazlett v. Chase Home Fin., LLC (In Re Nowak), 414 B.R. 269 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2009). · cites it 5× “In other words, it does not require anything, let alone that the official status of the certifying officer be identified.”
Stubbins v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (In Re Sunnafrank), 456 B.R. 885 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2011). · cites it 4× “Furthermore, the Ohio legislature, through the enactment of Ohio Rev.Code § 147.52, has made it clear that the “signature, rank, or title and serial number, if any, of the person [authorized to perform notarial acts] are sufficient proof of the authority of a holder of that rank…”
Luring v. Midland Mortg. Co. (In re White), 465 B.R. 146 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2012). · cites it 6× “Section 147.52 and not § 147.04 is the statute addressing the requirements for a notary or other appropriate officer to show his authority.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 147.52(A): 3 cases
Hazlett v. Chase Home Fin., LLC (In Re Nowak), 414 B.R. 269 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2009). “In other words, it does not require anything, let alone that the official status of the certifying officer be identified.”
Stubbins v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (In Re Sunnafrank), 456 B.R. 885 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2011). “Furthermore, the Ohio legislature, through the enactment of Ohio Rev.Code § 147.52, has made it clear that the “signature, rank, or title and serial number, if any, of the person [authorized to perform notarial acts] are sufficient proof of the authority of a holder of that rank…”
Luring v. Midland Mortg. Co. (In re White), 465 B.R. 146 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2012). “Section 147.52 and not § 147.04 is the statute addressing the requirements for a notary or other appropriate officer to show his authority.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.