Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.022 (2026)

Jurisdiction of Marion county probate judge - clerk of probate division

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Effective:

January 15, 1998

Latest Legislation:

House Bill 444 - 122nd General Assembly

PDF:

Download Authenticated PDF

(A) Except as provided in division (B) of this section and notwithstanding any provision of this chapter or of any other provision of the Revised Code, on and after February 9, 2003, the judge of the probate division of the court of common pleas of Marion county who is elected in 2002 pursuant to section 2101.02 of the Revised Code to fill the office of the judge of the probate division of the court of common pleas of Marion county whose term expires on February 8, 2003, and successors to that judge, shall have all the powers relating to the domestic relations-juvenile-probate division of the court of common pleas of Marion county, as established pursuant to division (Z)(1) of section 2301.03 of the Revised Code, in addition to the powers relating to the probate division of that court, and shall exercise concurrent jurisdiction with the judge of the domestic relations-juvenile-probate division of the court of common pleas of Marion county over all matters that are within the jurisdiction of the probate division of that court under Chapter 2101., and other provisions, of the Revised Code and all matters that are within the jurisdiction of the domestic relations- juvenile-probate division of that court, as set forth in division (Z)(1) of section 2301.03 of the Revised Code.

(B) On and after February 9, 2003, the judge of the court of common pleas of Marion county who is to serve as the clerk of the probate division of the court of common pleas of Marion county shall be determined as provided in division (Z)(2) of section 2301.03 of the Revised Code.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 13 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2003–2026 · leading case: In re J.M.G., 2013 Ohio 2693 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In re J.M.G., 2013 Ohio 2693 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “under section 2101.022 or 2301.03 of the Revised Code of the county in which the child support enforcement agency that employs the administrative officer is located.”

Morris v. Mottern, 2015 Ohio 4523 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 4× “06(A) states that a paternity action “may be brought in the * * * other court with jurisdiction under 15 section 2101.022 or 2301.03 of the Revised Code of the county in which the child, the child’s mother, or the alleged father resides[.”

In re S.K.L., 2016 Ohio 2826 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “18 of the Revised Code may be brought in the juvenile court or other court with jurisdiction under section 2101.022 or 2301.03 of the Revised Code of the county in which the child, the child’s mother, or the alleged father resides or is found * * *.”

In re R.L.H., 2014 Ohio 3411 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “18 of the Revised Code may be brought in the juvenile court or other court with jurisdiction under section 2101.022 or 2301.03 of the Revised Code of the county in which the child, the child’s mother, or the alleged father resides or is found * * * or of the county in which the…”

In re I.L.J., 2016 Ohio 7052 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “231 of the Revised Code in the juvenile court or other court with jurisdiction under section 2101.022 or 2301.03 of the Revised Code of the county in which the child support enforcement agency that employs the administrative officer is located.”

In Re R.c.s.l-k., 2020 Ohio 5624 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “18 of the Revised Code may be brought in the juvenile court or other court with jurisdiction under section 2101.022 or 2301.03 of the Revised Code of the county in which the child, the child’s mother, or the alleged father resides or is found * * * or of the county in which the…”

Craver v. Haefner, 2024 Ohio 2242 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “231(A) states, in pertinent part, “The parent * * * of a child * * * may bring an action in a juvenile court or other court with jurisdiction under section 2101.022 or 2301.03 of the Revised Code under this section No.”

Perez v. Simkins, 2014 Ohio 4006 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “The last section of that proposed order provided Simkins notice that: In accordance with ORC section 3119.61, the Child Support Obligor and Child Support Obligee may object to the modified support order by initiating an action under ORC section 2151.”

In re J-L.H, 2014 Ohio 1245 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “231 of the Revised Code in the juvenile court or other court with jurisdiction under section 2101.022 or 2301.03 of the Revised Code of the county in which the child support enforcement agency that employs the administrative officer is located.”

Bursiel v. Bursiel, 2021 Ohio 1548 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “s to whether the order should be terminated or whether any other appropriate determination regarding the order should be made”: (A) With respect to a court child support order, in the court that issued the order or that otherwise has jurisdiction over the order; (B) With respect…”

Jefferson Cnty. Child Support Enf't Agency ex rel. Gilliam v. DeLauder, 151 Ohio App. 3d 640 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “37 states: {¶ 34} “If an obligor or any other person fails to comply with an administrative child support order, the agency that issued the order may request that the juvenile court or other court with jurisdiction under section 2101.022 or 2301.03 of the Revised Code of the…”

In re H.E.C., 2022 Ohio 1989 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 3× “231 permits only the custodian of a child with whom a child resides to bring an action in a juvenile court, or other court with jurisdiction under R.C. 2101.022 or 2301.03, for an order requiring a parent of the child to pay an amount for the support of the child.”

Show all 13 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.