The juvenile judge may appoint such bailiffs, probation officers, and other employees as are necessary and may designate their titles and fix their duties, compensation, and expense allowances. The juvenile court may by entry on its journal authorize any deputy clerk to administer oaths when necessary in the discharge of the deputy clerk's duties. Such employees shall serve during the pleasure of the judge.
The compensation and expenses of all employees and the salary and expenses of the judge shall be paid in semimonthly installments by the county treasurer from the money appropriated for the operation of the court, upon the warrant of the county auditor, certified to by the judge.
The judge may require any employee to give bond in the sum of not less than one thousand dollars, conditioned for the honest and faithful performance of the employee's duties. The sureties on such bonds shall be approved in the manner provided by section 2151.12 of the Revised Code. The judge shall not be personally liable for the default, misfeasance, or nonfeasance of any employee.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1985–2025 · leading case: Smith v. Grady, 960 F. Supp. 2d 735 (S.D. Ohio 2013).
Smith v. Grady, 960 F. Supp. 2d 735 (S.D. Ohio 2013). · cites it 18ד” Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.13. The juvenile judge appoints the superintendent of a county juvenile detention facility, who in turn appoints the facility’s employees.”
Laborers' Int'l Union of N.A. v. Terease Neff, 29 F.4th 325 (6th Cir. 2022). “See Ohio Rev. Code §§ 2151.13, 2153.08. He or she fixes compensation in the first instance and has the ultimate responsibility for firing employees.”
David M. Mumford v. David A. Basinski, 105 F.3d 264 (6th Cir. 1997). “Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2151.13 (Anderson 1994) empowers juvenile court judges in Ohio to appoint such "employees as are necessary and may designate their titles and fix their duties, compensation, and expense allowances.”
State ex rel. Ohio Council 8 v. Spellacy, 478 N.E.2d 229 (Ohio 1985). · cites it 3ד27, which, in pertinent part, provides: “* * * The court shall make such appointments, fix the salaries of appointees, and supervise the work of appointees.”
State ex rel. Hunter v. Summit Cnty. Human Resource Comm'n, 692 N.E.2d 185 (Ohio 1998). “” R.C. 2151.13 provides that juvenile.court judges “may appoint such bailiffs, probation officers, and other employees as are necessary” and that “[s]uch employees shall serve during the pleasure of the judge.”
Malhotra v. Montgomery Cty. Juv. Ct., 2014 Ohio 1861 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 17ד11(A)(32) and R.C. 2151.13. Malhotra moved for reconsideration.”
In re T.D.R., 2015 Ohio 3541 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015). “, an adjudicated delinquent child, appeals from the judgment of the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, classifying him as a serious youthful offender (“SYO”) and accordingly entering a dispositional sentence pursuant to R.C. 2151.13. We affirm the trial court.…”
Abbott v. Stepanik, 582 N.E.2d 1082 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990). “” R.C. 2151.13 provides, in part: “The juvenile judge may appoint such bailiffs, probation officers, and other employees as are necessary and may designate their titles and fix their duties, compensation, and expense allowances.”
State ex rel. Hunter v. Summit Cty. Human Resource Comm., 1998 Ohio 614 (Ohio 1998). “03(I)(2) provides that the Summit County Court of Common Pleas Juvenile Division Judge “shall be, and have the powers and jurisdiction of, the juvenile judge as provided in Chapter 2151. of the Revised Code” and “shall have charge of the employment, assignment, and supervision…”
In re T.A., 2025 Ohio 3079 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “23AP-381 2 offender dispositional sentence pursuant to R.C. 2151.13(A)(4)(a). At an adjudicatory hearing held on May 18, 2023, T.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.13(A)(4)(a) — 1 case
In re T.A., 2025 Ohio 3079 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “23AP-381 2 offender dispositional sentence pursuant to R.C. 2151.13(A)(4)(a). At an adjudicatory hearing held on May 18, 2023, T.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.