Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2151 - Ohio Revised Code | Ohio Laws
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141 (2026)

Written request for records relating to alleged abused, neglected or dependent child

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
April 10, 2001
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 412, Senate Bill 179 - 123rd General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

(A) If a complaint filed with respect to a child pursuant to section 2151.27 of the Revised Code alleges that a child is an abused, neglected, or dependent child, any individual or entity that is listed in divisions (D)(1)(a) to (k) of section 2151.14 of the Revised Code and that is investigating whether the child is an abused, neglected, or dependent child, has custody of the child, is preparing a social history for the child, or is providing any services for the child may request any board of education, governing body of a chartered nonpublic school, public children services agency, private child placing agency, probation department, law enforcement agency, or prosecuting attorney that has any records related to the child to provide the individual or entity with a copy of the records. The request shall be in writing, describe the type of records requested, explain the need for the records, be accompanied by a copy of the complaint, and describe the relationship of the requesting individual or entity to the child. The individual or entity shall provide a copy of the request to the child in question, the attorney or guardian ad litem of the child, and the parent, guardian, or custodian of the child.

(B)(1) Any board of education, governing body of a chartered nonpublic school, public children services agency, private child placing agency, probation department, law enforcement agency, or prosecuting attorney that has any records related to a child who is the subject of a complaint as described in division (A) of this section and that receives a request for a copy of the records pursuant to division (A) of this section shall comply with the request, unless the individual or entity determines that it is unable to do so because it is prohibited by law from complying with the request, the request does not comply with division (A) of this section, or a complaint as described in division (A) of this section has not been filed with respect to the child who is the subject of the requested records. If the individual or entity determines that it is unable to comply with the request, it shall file a motion with the court in which the complaint as described in division (A) of this section was filed or was alleged to have been filed requesting the court to determine the extent to which it is required to comply with the request for records. Upon the filing of the motion, the court immediately shall hold a hearing on the motion, determine the extent to which the movant is required to comply with the request for records, and issue findings of fact and conclusions of law in support of its determination. The determination of the court shall be final. If the court determines that the movant is required to comply with the request for records, it shall identify the specific records that must be supplied to the individual or entity that requested them.

(2) In addition to or in lieu of the motion described in division (B)(1) of this section, a law enforcement agency or prosecuting attorney that receives a request for a copy of records pursuant to division (A) of this section may file a motion for a protective order as described in this division with the court in which the complaint as described in division (A) of this section was filed or alleged to have been filed. Upon the filing of a motion of that nature, the court shall conduct a hearing on the motion. If at the hearing the law enforcement agency or prosecuting attorney demonstrates that any of the following applies and if, after considering the purposes for which the records were requested pursuant to division (A) of this section, the best interest of the child, and any demonstrated need to prevent specific information in the records from being disclosed, the court determines that the issuance of a protective order is necessary, then the court shall issue a protective order that appropriately limits the disclosure of one or more specified records or specified information in one or more specified records:

(a) The records or information in the records relate to a case in which the child is alleged to be a delinquent child or a case in which a child is transferred for trial as an adult pursuant to section 2152.12 of the Revised Code and Juvenile Rule 30, and the adjudication hearing in the case, the trial in the case, or other disposition of the case has not been concluded.

(b) The records in question, or the records containing the information in question, are confidential law enforcement investigatory records, as defined in section 149.43 of the Revised Code.

(c) The records or information in the records relate to a case in which the child is or was alleged to be a delinquent child or to a case in which a child is or was transferred for trial as an adult pursuant to section 2152.12 of the Revised Code and Juvenile Rule 30; another case is pending against any child or any adult in which the child is alleged to be a delinquent child, the child is so transferred for trial as an adult, or the adult is alleged to be a criminal offender; the allegations in the case to which the records or information relate and the allegations in the other case are based on the same act or transaction, are based on two or more connected transactions or constitute parts of a common scheme or plan, or are part of a course of criminal conduct; and the adjudication hearing in, trial in, or other disposition of the other case has not been concluded.

(C) If an individual or entity is required to provide copies of records pursuant to this section, the individual or entity may charge a fee for the copies that does not exceed the cost of supplying them.

(D) This section does not require, authorize, or permit the dissemination of any records or any information contained in any records if the dissemination of the records or information generally is prohibited by section 2151.142 or another section of the Revised Code and a waiver as described in division (B)(1) of section 2151.142 of the Revised Code or a specific provision of the Revised Code does not specifically authorize or permit the dissemination of the records or information pursuant to this section.

The Legislative Service Commission presents the text of this section as a composite of the section as amended by multiple acts of the General Assembly. This presentation recognizes the principle stated in R.C. 1.52(B) that amendments are to be harmonized if reasonably capable of simultaneous operation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28 cases (14 in the last 5 years), 2010–2026 · leading case: In re K.M.S., 2017 Ohio 142 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re K.M.S., 2017 Ohio 142 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “However, the trial court reviewed the both the testimony and the report - 29 - Case Nos 9-15-37, 38, 39 of the GAL as part of its determination under R.C. 2151.141(D)(1)(b), which directs the court to consider the “wishes of the child, as expressed directly by the child or…”
In re A.A., 2016 Ohio 2992 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “" {¶ 19} Finally, with respect to R.C. 2151.141(D)(1)(e), the juvenile court determined that R.”
In re D.H., 2022 Ohio 4495 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “In his appellate brief, Father repeatedly cites to R.C. 2151.141 in support of his argument.”
In re A.M., 2019 Ohio 2028 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “The appellate court determined that it could not, on its own, make a determination that one of the other R.C. 2151.141(E) factors was present, concluding that “[o]ur review of the record in this case does not permit us to enter a determination not considered in the first…”
In re G.P., 2018 Ohio 4584 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “We find, therefore, that the trial court’s findings under R.C. 2151.141(E)(1) are supported by the evidence.”
In re E.H., 2022 Ohio 1275 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “In that case, the juvenile court listed generically the five factors which must be considered in R.C. 2151.141(D)(1), but did not apply the factors to any specific facts of the case.”
In re V.W., 2022 Ohio 2487 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “For clarity of analysis and to avoid duplication, we address the appellants' assignments of error in five categories: (1) reasonable efforts at reunification; (2) reliance on R.C. 2151.141(B)(2); (3) placement with B.”
In re Co.J., 2020 Ohio 538 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “{¶27} Accordingly, based on the evidence presented and because it is dispositive, we conclude that the trial court’s determinations under R.C. 2151.141(B)(1)(d) are sufficient to satisfy the first prong of the permanent-custody test and are not against the manifest weight of the…”
In re J.C., 2024 Ohio 5107 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “414(D)(1)(e)) {¶ 48} Finally, we look at whether any of the factors provided in divisions R.C. 2151.141 (E)(7) through (E)(11) are applicable.”
In re R.C., 2010 Ohio 3800 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010). “Obviously the children could not be placed with either parent within a reasonable amount of time and given the testimony regarding the lack of enthusiasm dealing with the 2 The transcript of the hearing reads R.C. 2151.141. However, this section involves a request for copies of…”
In re E.H., 2022 Ohio 1190 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “{¶47} The juvenile court in that case listed generically the five factors which must be considered in R.C. 2151.141(D)(1). The supreme court noted there was no application of the factors to specific facts of the case and therefore generically listing the factors was insufficient.”
In re J.D., 2022 Ohio 2677 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “could not be placed within a reasonable time or should not be placed with either parent because there is evidence that one or more factors in division (E) of R.C. 2151.141 exist: (1) Following the placement of the child outside the child’s home and notwithstanding reasonable…”
Show all 28 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141(1)(d) — 1 case
In re K.C., 2025 Ohio 1110 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141(B) — 1 case
In re M.R., 2018 Ohio 5047 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141(B)(1) — 1 case
In re K.C., 2025 Ohio 1110 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141(B)(1)(a) — 2 cases
In re K.C., 2025 Ohio 1110 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
In re L.D., 2012 Ohio 1810 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141(B)(1)(b) — 1 case
In re K.P., 2021 Ohio 552 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141(B)(1)(d) — 7 cases
In re Co.J., 2020 Ohio 538 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “{¶27} Accordingly, based on the evidence presented and because it is dispositive, we conclude that the trial court’s determinations under R.C. 2151.141(B)(1)(d) are sufficient to satisfy the first prong of the permanent-custody test and are not against the manifest weight of the…”
In re C.J., 2020 Ohio 538 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
In re A.T., 2020 Ohio 2781 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
In re M.W., 2024 Ohio 5328 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
In re D.C.-F., 2024 Ohio 1237 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141(B)(1)(e) — 1 case
In re M.W., 2024 Ohio 5328 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141(B)(2) — 1 case
In re V.W., 2022 Ohio 2487 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “For clarity of analysis and to avoid duplication, we address the appellants' assignments of error in five categories: (1) reasonable efforts at reunification; (2) reliance on R.C. 2151.141(B)(2); (3) placement with B.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141(D) — 1 case
In re J.M.M., 2019 Ohio 2874 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141(D)(1) — 4 cases
In re E.H., 2022 Ohio 1275 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “In that case, the juvenile court listed generically the five factors which must be considered in R.C. 2151.141(D)(1), but did not apply the factors to any specific facts of the case.”
In re E.H., 2022 Ohio 1190 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “{¶47} The juvenile court in that case listed generically the five factors which must be considered in R.C. 2151.141(D)(1). The supreme court noted there was no application of the factors to specific facts of the case and therefore generically listing the factors was insufficient.”
In re J.M.M., 2019 Ohio 2874 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
In re K.C., 2025 Ohio 1110 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141(D)(1)(b) — 1 case
In re K.M.S., 2017 Ohio 142 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “However, the trial court reviewed the both the testimony and the report - 29 - Case Nos 9-15-37, 38, 39 of the GAL as part of its determination under R.C. 2151.141(D)(1)(b), which directs the court to consider the “wishes of the child, as expressed directly by the child or…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141(D)(1)(e) — 1 case
In re A.A., 2016 Ohio 2992 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “" {¶ 19} Finally, with respect to R.C. 2151.141(D)(1)(e), the juvenile court determined that R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141(E) — 1 case
In re A.M., 2019 Ohio 2028 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “The appellate court determined that it could not, on its own, make a determination that one of the other R.C. 2151.141(E) factors was present, concluding that “[o]ur review of the record in this case does not permit us to enter a determination not considered in the first…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141(E)(1) — 3 cases
In re G.P., 2018 Ohio 4584 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “We find, therefore, that the trial court’s findings under R.C. 2151.141(E)(1) are supported by the evidence.”
In re A.T., 2020 Ohio 2781 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
In re M.L., 2013 Ohio 394 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141(E)(10) — 1 case
In re R, 2021 Ohio 1044 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141(E)(11) — 1 case
In re A.A., 2016 Ohio 2992 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “" {¶ 19} Finally, with respect to R.C. 2151.141(D)(1)(e), the juvenile court determined that R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141(E)(2) — 2 cases
In re G.P., 2018 Ohio 4584 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “We find, therefore, that the trial court’s findings under R.C. 2151.141(E)(1) are supported by the evidence.”
In re M.L., 2013 Ohio 394 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.141(E)(7) — 3 cases
In re J.L., 2018 Ohio 2073 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
In re R.E.A., 2026 Ohio 2423 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
In re R.E.A., 2026 Ohio 2422 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.