Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2151
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.24 (2026)

Separate room for hearings

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
January 1, 2002
Latest Legislation:
Senate Bill 179 - 123rd General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

(A) Except as provided in division (B) of this section, the board of county commissioners shall provide a special room not used for the trial of criminal or adult cases, when available, for the hearing of the cases of dependent, neglected, abused, and delinquent children.

(B) Division (A) of this section does not apply to the case of an alleged delinquent child when the case is one in which the prosecuting attorney seeks a serious youthful offender disposition under section 2152.13 of the Revised Code.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2013–2024 · leading case: In re R.M., 2013-Ohio-3588.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re R.M., 2013-Ohio-3588. “04(D), R.C. 2151.24(A)(1). Finally, the matter is res judicata as the issue would be one of personal jurisdiction and was not raised in a direct appeal of the adjudication and original disposition of September 12, 2011.”
In re T.C., 2024-Ohio-5816. “414(B)(1) is present, then the court proceeds to an analysis of the child’s best interest” under R.C. 2151.24(D)(1). In re J.B., 2013-Ohio-1705, ¶ 80-81 (8th Dist.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.24(A)(1): 1 case
In re R.M., 2013-Ohio-3588. “04(D), R.C. 2151.24(A)(1). Finally, the matter is res judicata as the issue would be one of personal jurisdiction and was not raised in a direct appeal of the adjudication and original disposition of September 12, 2011.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.24(D)(1): 1 case
In re T.C., 2024-Ohio-5816. “414(B)(1) is present, then the court proceeds to an analysis of the child’s best interest” under R.C. 2151.24(D)(1). In re J.B., 2013-Ohio-1705, ¶ 80-81 (8th Dist.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.