Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2152 - Ohio Revised Code | Ohio Laws
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02 (2026)

Delinquent children - juvenile traffic offender definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
April 4, 2023
Latest Legislation:
Senate Bill 288 - 134th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

As used in this chapter:

(A) "Act charged" means the act that is identified in a complaint, indictment, or information alleging that a child is a delinquent child.

(B) "Admitted to a department of youth services facility" includes admission to a facility operated, or contracted for, by the department and admission to a comparable facility outside this state by another state or the United States.

(C)(1) "Child" means a person who is under eighteen years of age, except as otherwise provided in divisions (C)(2) to (8) of this section.

(2) Subject to division (C)(3) of this section, any person who violates a federal or state law or a municipal ordinance prior to attaining eighteen years of age shall be deemed a "child" irrespective of that person's age at the time the complaint with respect to that violation is filed or the hearing on the complaint is held.

(3) Any person who, while under eighteen years of age, commits an act that would be a felony if committed by an adult and who is not taken into custody or apprehended for that act until after the person attains twenty-one years of age is not a child in relation to that act.

(4) Except as otherwise provided in divisions (C)(5) and (7) of this section, any person whose case is transferred for criminal prosecution pursuant to section 2152.12 of the Revised Code shall be deemed after the transfer not to be a child in the transferred case.

(5) Any person whose case is transferred for criminal prosecution pursuant to section 2152.12 of the Revised Code and who subsequently is convicted of or pleads guilty to a felony in that case, unless a serious youthful offender dispositional sentence is imposed on the child for that offense under division (B)(2) or (3) of section 2152.121 of the Revised Code and the adult portion of that sentence is not invoked pursuant to section 2152.14 of the Revised Code, and any person who is adjudicated a delinquent child for the commission of an act, who has a serious youthful offender dispositional sentence imposed for the act pursuant to section 2152.13 of the Revised Code, and whose adult portion of the dispositional sentence is invoked pursuant to section 2152.14 of the Revised Code, shall be deemed after the conviction, plea, or invocation not to be a child in any case in which a complaint is filed against the person.

(6) The juvenile court has jurisdiction over a person who is adjudicated a delinquent child or juvenile traffic offender prior to attaining eighteen years of age until the person attains twenty-one years of age, and, for purposes of that jurisdiction related to that adjudication, except as otherwise provided in this division, a person who is so adjudicated a delinquent child or juvenile traffic offender shall be deemed a "child" until the person attains twenty-one years of age. If a person is so adjudicated a delinquent child or juvenile traffic offender and the court makes a disposition of the person under this chapter, at any time after the person attains twenty-one years of age, the places at which the person may be held under that disposition are not limited to places authorized under this chapter solely for confinement of children, and the person may be confined under that disposition, in accordance with division (F)(2) of section 2152.26 of the Revised Code, in places other than those authorized under this chapter solely for confinement of children.

(7) The juvenile court has jurisdiction over any person whose case is transferred for criminal prosecution solely for the purpose of detaining the person as authorized in division (F)(1) or (4) of section 2152.26 of the Revised Code unless the person is convicted of or pleads guilty to a felony in the adult court.

(8) Any person who, while eighteen years of age, violates division (A)(1) or (2) of section 2919.27 of the Revised Code by violating a protection order issued or consent agreement approved under section 2151.34 or 3113.31 of the Revised Code shall be considered a child for the purposes of that violation of section 2919.27 of the Revised Code.

(D) "Community corrections facility," "public safety beds," "release authority," and "supervised release" have the same meanings as in section 5139.01 of the Revised Code.

(E) "Delinquent child" includes any of the following:

(1) Any child, except a juvenile traffic offender, who violates any law of this state or the United States, or any ordinance of a political subdivision of the state, that would be an offense if committed by an adult;

(2) Any child who violates any lawful order of the court made under this chapter, including a child who violates a court order regarding the child's prior adjudication as an unruly child for being an habitual truant;

(3) Any child who violates any lawful order of the court made under Chapter 2151. of the Revised Code other than an order issued under section 2151.87 of the Revised Code;

(4) Any child who violates division (C) of section 2907.39, division (A) of section 2923.211, or division (C)(1) or (D) of section 2925.55 of the Revised Code.

(F) "Discretionary serious youthful offender" means a person who is eligible for a discretionary SYO and who is not transferred to adult court under a mandatory or discretionary transfer.

(G) "Discretionary SYO" means a case in which the juvenile court, in the juvenile court's discretion, may impose a serious youthful offender disposition under section 2152.13 of the Revised Code.

(H) "Discretionary transfer" means that the juvenile court has discretion to transfer a case for criminal prosecution under division (B) of section 2152.12 of the Revised Code.

(I) "Drug abuse offense," "felony drug abuse offense," and "minor drug possession offense" have the same meanings as in section 2925.01 of the Revised Code.

(J) "Electronic monitoring" and "electronic monitoring device" have the same meanings as in section 2929.01 of the Revised Code.

(K) "Economic loss" means any economic detriment suffered by a victim of a delinquent act or juvenile traffic offense as a direct and proximate result of the delinquent act or juvenile traffic offense and includes any loss of income due to lost time at work because of any injury caused to the victim and any property loss, medical cost, or funeral expense incurred as a result of the delinquent act or juvenile traffic offense. "Economic loss" does not include non-economic loss or any punitive or exemplary damages.

(L) "Firearm" has the same meaning as in section 2923.11 of the Revised Code.

(M) "Intellectual disability" has the same meaning as in section 5123.01 of the Revised Code.

(N) "Juvenile traffic offender" means any child who violates any traffic law, traffic ordinance, or traffic regulation of this state, the United States, or any political subdivision of this state, other than a resolution, ordinance, or regulation of a political subdivision of this state the violation of which is required to be handled by a parking violations bureau or a joint parking violations bureau pursuant to Chapter 4521. of the Revised Code.

(O) A "legitimate excuse for absence from the public school the child is supposed to attend" has the same meaning as in section 2151.011 of the Revised Code.

(P) "Mandatory serious youthful offender" means a person who is eligible for a mandatory SYO and who is not transferred to adult court under a mandatory or discretionary transfer and also includes, for purposes of imposition of a mandatory serious youthful dispositional sentence under section 2152.13 of the Revised Code, a person upon whom a juvenile court is required to impose such a sentence under division (B)(3) of section 2152.121 of the Revised Code.

(Q) "Mandatory SYO" means a case in which the juvenile court is required to impose a mandatory serious youthful offender disposition under section 2152.13 of the Revised Code.

(R) "Mandatory transfer" means that a case is required to be transferred for criminal prosecution under division (A) of section 2152.12 of the Revised Code.

(S) "Mental illness" has the same meaning as in section 5122.01 of the Revised Code.

(T) "Monitored time" and "repeat violent offender" have the same meanings as in section 2929.01 of the Revised Code.

(U) "Of compulsory school age" has the same meaning as in section 3321.01 of the Revised Code.

(V) "Public record" has the same meaning as in section 149.43 of the Revised Code.

(W) "Serious youthful offender" means a person who is eligible for a mandatory SYO or discretionary SYO but who is not transferred to adult court under a mandatory or discretionary transfer and also includes, for purposes of imposition of a mandatory serious youthful dispositional sentence under section 2152.13 of the Revised Code, a person upon whom a juvenile court is required to impose such a sentence under division (B)(3) of section 2152.121 of the Revised Code.

(X) "Sexually oriented offense," "juvenile offender registrant," "child-victim oriented offense," "tier I sex offender/child-victim offender," "tier II sex offender/child-victim offender," "tier III sex offender/child-victim offender," and "public registry-qualified juvenile offender registrant" have the same meanings as in section 2950.01 of the Revised Code.

(Y) "Traditional juvenile" means a case that is not transferred to adult court under a mandatory or discretionary transfer, that is eligible for a disposition under sections 2152.16, 2152.17, 2152.19, and 2152.20 of the Revised Code, and that is not eligible for a disposition under section 2152.13 of the Revised Code.

(Z) "Transfer" means, except with respect to a transfer from a criminal court to a juvenile court under section 2152.03 or 2152.121 of the Revised Code, the transfer for criminal prosecution of a case that includes a charge alleging that a child is a delinquent child for committing an act that would be an offense if committed by an adult from the juvenile court to the appropriate court that has jurisdiction of the offense.

(AA) "Category one offense" means any of the following:

(1) A violation of section 2903.01 or 2903.02 of the Revised Code;

(2) A violation of section 2923.02 of the Revised Code involving an attempt to commit aggravated murder or murder.

(BB) "Category two offense" means any of the following:

(1) A violation of section 2903.03, 2905.01, 2907.02, 2909.02, 2911.01, or 2911.11 of the Revised Code;

(2) A violation of section 2903.04 of the Revised Code that is a felony of the first degree;

(3) A violation of section 2907.12 of the Revised Code as it existed prior to September 3, 1996.

(CC) "Non-economic loss" means nonpecuniary harm suffered by a victim of a delinquent act or juvenile traffic offense as a result of or related to the delinquent act or juvenile traffic offense, including, but not limited to, pain and suffering; loss of society, consortium, companionship, care, assistance, attention, protection, advice, guidance, counsel, instruction, training, or education; mental anguish; and any other intangible loss.

Last updated February 14, 2023 at 8:06 AM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 210 cases (61 in the last 5 years), 2001–2026 · leading case: State ex rel. Jean-Baptiste v. Kirsch, 2012 Ohio 5697 (Ohio 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Jean-Baptiste v. Kirsch, 2012 Ohio 5697 (Ohio 2012). · cites it 24× “{¶ 7} Jean-Baptiste raised the following arguments: (1) Judge Kirsch does not have jurisdiction to classify him as a juvenile-offender registrant, because he is over 21 years old and is thus not a “child” as defined in R.”
State v. Hudson, 2022 Ohio 1435 (Ohio 2022). · cites it 16× “The state argues that because Hudson was 22, the juvenile court was divested of jurisdiction under R.C. 2152.02(C)(2) and 2151.”
State v. Smith (Slip Opinion), 2022 Ohio 274 (Ohio 2022). · cites it 12× “R.C. 2152.02(A) defines “act charged” as “the act that is identified in a complaint, indictment, or information alleging that a child is a delinquent child.”
State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion), 2017 Ohio 2956 (Ohio 2017). · cites it 4× “Aggravated robbery is a category-two offense, R.C. 2152.02(BB)(1), and Aalim was 16 years old at the time the offense was committed.”
In re J.V., 2012 Ohio 4961 (Ohio 2012). · cites it 8× “He relies on R.C. 2152.02(C)(6), which states, “The juvenile court has jurisdiction over a person who is adjudicated a delinquent child or juvenile traffic offender prior to attaining eighteen years of age until the person attains twenty-one years of age.”
State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 8278 (Ohio 2016). · cites it 5× “R.C. 2152.02(C).3 All 16- and 17-year-olds accordingly fall under the definition of “child” and are afforded the constitutional protections that all children 3 R.”
State v. Lewis, 2017 Ohio 9311 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 18× “{¶ 33} Consistent with that charge, after a trial, the magistrate filed findings of fact, stating that Lewis was before the court for trial on an allegation that she “did act in a way tending to cause a child to become delinquent as defined in ORC §2152.02, in violation of ORC…”
State v. Warren, 118 Ohio St. 3d 200 (Ohio 2008). · cites it 9× “011 now appears in R.C. 2152.02. See 148 Ohio Laws, Part TV, 9536; Staff Notes to July 1, 2001 amendment to Juv.”
State v. Morgan (Slip Opinion), 2017 Ohio 7565 (Ohio 2017). · cites it 2× “02(A), now R.C. 2152.02(E)(1) (defining “delinquent child” as a child who commits an act that would be a crime if committed by an adult 15 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO {¶ 45} Responding to Kent and Gault, the General Assembly enacted former R.”
In re R.B. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5476 (Ohio 2020). · cites it 5× “rt has jurisdiction over juveniles who have been adjudicated delinquent until they reach the age of 21: The juvenile court has jurisdiction over a person who is adjudicated a delinquent child or juvenile traffic offender prior to attaining eighteen years of age until the person…”
State v. Austin, 2017 Ohio 7845 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 7× “ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR I R.C. 2152.02(C)(3) AND R.C. 2152.12(J) ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS APPLIED TO DANIEL AUSTIN AS TO COUNTS 1, 6, 12, 15 WHEN THE TRIAL COURT PREVIOUSLY RULED THAT TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY REQUIRE MR.”
State v. Stidam, 2016 Ohio 7906 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 6× “15CA1014 16 {¶ 29} In the lead opinion garnering three votes, the Court, relying on its decision in Walls, held that R.C. 2152.02(C)(2), 2151.23(I), and 2152.”
Show all 210 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(6) — 1 case
In re C.W., 2010 Ohio 5633 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(A) — 4 cases
State v. Smith (Slip Opinion), 2022 Ohio 274 (Ohio 2022). “R.C. 2152.02(A) defines “act charged” as “the act that is identified in a complaint, indictment, or information alleging that a child is a delinquent child.”
State v. Taylor, 2022 Ohio 2877 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Carter, 2023 Ohio 4310 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
In re C.R., 2021 Ohio 2456 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(A)(1) — 1 case
Est. of Crnjak v. Lake Hosp. Sys. Inc., 2024 Ohio 1977 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(AA) — 6 cases
State v. Taylor, 2022 Ohio 2877 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
In re R.N., 2018 Ohio 5006 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
State v. Rosser, 2017 Ohio 5572 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Carter-El, 2025 Ohio 4842 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
State v. Bowdish, 2017 Ohio 8916 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(AA)(2) — 1 case
State v. Washington, 2025 Ohio 5755 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(B) — 2 cases
In re T.T., 2021 Ohio 759 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
In re S.I.G., 2023 Ohio 2912 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(B)(B) — 1 case
State v. Lane, 2014 Ohio 2010 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(B)(B)(1) — 1 case
State v. Taylor, 2018 Ohio 3998 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(BB) — 13 cases
State v. Frazier, 2019 Ohio 1433 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
State v. D.B., 2017 Ohio 6952 (Ohio 2017).
Smith v. May (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 61 (Ohio 2020).
State v. Cunningham, 2022 Ohio 3497 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Lane, 2014 Ohio 2010 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(BB)(1) — 14 cases
State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion), 2017 Ohio 2956 (Ohio 2017). “Aggravated robbery is a category-two offense, R.C. 2152.02(BB)(1), and Aalim was 16 years old at the time the offense was committed.”
State v. Smith (Slip Opinion), 2022 Ohio 274 (Ohio 2022). “R.C. 2152.02(A) defines “act charged” as “the act that is identified in a complaint, indictment, or information alleging that a child is a delinquent child.”
State v. Grant, 2019 Ohio 3561 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
State v. Ferguson, 2017 Ohio 7930 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Jackson, 2020 Ohio 80 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(BB)(2) — 1 case
State v. McCray, 2023 Ohio 4814 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(C) — 17 cases
State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion), 2017 Ohio 2956 (Ohio 2017). “Aggravated robbery is a category-two offense, R.C. 2152.02(BB)(1), and Aalim was 16 years old at the time the offense was committed.”
State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 8278 (Ohio 2016). “R.C. 2152.02(C).3 All 16- and 17-year-olds accordingly fall under the definition of “child” and are afforded the constitutional protections that all children 3 R.”
State ex rel. Jean-Baptiste v. Kirsch, 2012 Ohio 5697 (Ohio 2012). “{¶ 7} Jean-Baptiste raised the following arguments: (1) Judge Kirsch does not have jurisdiction to classify him as a juvenile-offender registrant, because he is over 21 years old and is thus not a “child” as defined in R.”
In re W.Z., 957 N.E.2d 367 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
State v. Muhammad, 2014 Ohio 5771 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(C)(1) — 26 cases
In Re A.G., 2016 Ohio 3306 (Ohio 2016).
State v. Hudson, 2022 Ohio 1435 (Ohio 2022). “The state argues that because Hudson was 22, the juvenile court was divested of jurisdiction under R.C. 2152.02(C)(2) and 2151.”
Steele v. Harris (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5480 (Ohio 2020).
Johnson v. Sloan (Slip Opinion), 2018 Ohio 2120 (Ohio 2018).
In re D.J., 2018 Ohio 569 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(C)(2) — 17 cases
State ex rel. Jean-Baptiste v. Kirsch, 2012 Ohio 5697 (Ohio 2012). “{¶ 7} Jean-Baptiste raised the following arguments: (1) Judge Kirsch does not have jurisdiction to classify him as a juvenile-offender registrant, because he is over 21 years old and is thus not a “child” as defined in R.”
State v. Hudson, 2022 Ohio 1435 (Ohio 2022). “The state argues that because Hudson was 22, the juvenile court was divested of jurisdiction under R.C. 2152.02(C)(2) and 2151.”
State v. Stidam, 2016 Ohio 7906 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “15CA1014 16 {¶ 29} In the lead opinion garnering three votes, the Court, relying on its decision in Walls, held that R.C. 2152.02(C)(2), 2151.23(I), and 2152.”
State ex rel. N.A. v. Cross, 2010 Ohio 1471 (Ohio 2010).
In re D.R.B., 2015 Ohio 3346 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(C)(3) — 17 cases
State v. Hudson, 2022 Ohio 1435 (Ohio 2022). “The state argues that because Hudson was 22, the juvenile court was divested of jurisdiction under R.C. 2152.02(C)(2) and 2151.”
State v. Warren, 118 Ohio St. 3d 200 (Ohio 2008). “011 now appears in R.C. 2152.02. See 148 Ohio Laws, Part TV, 9536; Staff Notes to July 1, 2001 amendment to Juv.”
State v. Austin, 2017 Ohio 7845 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR I R.C. 2152.02(C)(3) AND R.C. 2152.12(J) ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS APPLIED TO DANIEL AUSTIN AS TO COUNTS 1, 6, 12, 15 WHEN THE TRIAL COURT PREVIOUSLY RULED THAT TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY REQUIRE MR.”
State v. Stidam, 2016 Ohio 7906 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “15CA1014 16 {¶ 29} In the lead opinion garnering three votes, the Court, relying on its decision in Walls, held that R.C. 2152.02(C)(2), 2151.23(I), and 2152.”
State v. Kocevar, 2023 Ohio 1513 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(C)(4) — 6 cases
State v. Curtis, 2016 Ohio 6978 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Martin, 2016 Ohio 922 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Jones, 2022 Ohio 1169 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Hamilton, 2016 Ohio 1376 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Carberry, 2018 Ohio 1060 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(C)(5) — 4 cases
State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 8278 (Ohio 2016). “R.C. 2152.02(C).3 All 16- and 17-year-olds accordingly fall under the definition of “child” and are afforded the constitutional protections that all children 3 R.”
State v. Jones, 2022 Ohio 1169 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Wyerick, 2009 Ohio 3153 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009).
In re E.J.W., 2022 Ohio 4215 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(C)(6) — 25 cases
In re J.V., 2012 Ohio 4961 (Ohio 2012). “He relies on R.C. 2152.02(C)(6), which states, “The juvenile court has jurisdiction over a person who is adjudicated a delinquent child or juvenile traffic offender prior to attaining eighteen years of age until the person attains twenty-one years of age.”
State ex rel. Jean-Baptiste v. Kirsch, 2012 Ohio 5697 (Ohio 2012). “{¶ 7} Jean-Baptiste raised the following arguments: (1) Judge Kirsch does not have jurisdiction to classify him as a juvenile-offender registrant, because he is over 21 years old and is thus not a “child” as defined in R.”
In re R.B. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5476 (Ohio 2020). “rt has jurisdiction over juveniles who have been adjudicated delinquent until they reach the age of 21: The juvenile court has jurisdiction over a person who is adjudicated a delinquent child or juvenile traffic offender prior to attaining eighteen years of age until the person…”
In re C.W., 2013 Ohio 2483 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
State ex rel. N.A. v. Cross, 2010 Ohio 1471 (Ohio 2010).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(CC) — 7 cases
In re M.N., 2017 Ohio 7302 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
In re D.M. (Slip Opinion), 2014 Ohio 3628 (Ohio 2014).
State v. Roark, 2015 Ohio 3811 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
State v. R.D., 2014 Ohio 5100 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Brookshire, 2014 Ohio 5368 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(CC)(1) — 9 cases
State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 8278 (Ohio 2016). “R.C. 2152.02(C).3 All 16- and 17-year-olds accordingly fall under the definition of “child” and are afforded the constitutional protections that all children 3 R.”
State v. Mays, 2014 Ohio 3815 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Cockrell, 2016 Ohio 5797 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Bradford, 2014 Ohio 904 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
State v. McKinney, 2015 Ohio 4398 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(D) — 3 cases
In re E.H., 2016 Ohio 1186 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
Akin v. Akin, 2011 Ohio 2765 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
In re S.I.G., 2023 Ohio 2912 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(DD) — 1 case
In re M.A., 2016 Ohio 1161 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(E) — 5 cases
In re J.D., 2022 Ohio 2334 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
In re J.A., 2018 Ohio 1609 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
In re D.P., 2025 Ohio 95 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
In re D.L., 2023 Ohio 4029 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
In re C.R., 2021 Ohio 2456 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(E)(1) — 13 cases
State v. Morgan (Slip Opinion), 2017 Ohio 7565 (Ohio 2017). “02(A), now R.C. 2152.02(E)(1) (defining “delinquent child” as a child who commits an act that would be a crime if committed by an adult 15 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO {¶ 45} Responding to Kent and Gault, the General Assembly enacted former R.”
State v. Russell, 2020 Ohio 3243 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
In re N.K., 2021 Ohio 3858 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
State v. Cunningham, 2022 Ohio 3497 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Bloom, 2024 Ohio 5029 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(E)(2) — 1 case
State v. Lewis, 2017 Ohio 9311 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “{¶ 33} Consistent with that charge, after a trial, the magistrate filed findings of fact, stating that Lewis was before the court for trial on an allegation that she “did act in a way tending to cause a child to become delinquent as defined in ORC §2152.02, in violation of ORC…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(F) — 14 cases
In re D.B., 2011 Ohio 2671 (Ohio 2011).
State v. Lewis, 2017 Ohio 9311 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “{¶ 33} Consistent with that charge, after a trial, the magistrate filed findings of fact, stating that Lewis was before the court for trial on an allegation that she “did act in a way tending to cause a child to become delinquent as defined in ORC §2152.02, in violation of ORC…”
State v. Johnson, 2015 Ohio 96 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
In re Williams, 2011 Ohio 4338 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
In re D.L., 2012 Ohio 1796 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(F)(1) — 12 cases
In Re Slider, 826 N.E.2d 356 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).
State v. Walls, 96 Ohio St. 3d 437 (Ohio 2002).
State v. Walls, 2002 Ohio 5059 (Ohio 2002).
In re L.A.B., 902 N.E.2d 471 (Ohio 2009).
State v. Bromagen, 2012 Ohio 5757 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(F)(2) — 9 cases
In re L.A.B., 902 N.E.2d 471 (Ohio 2009).
State v. Lewis, 2017 Ohio 9311 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “{¶ 33} Consistent with that charge, after a trial, the magistrate filed findings of fact, stating that Lewis was before the court for trial on an allegation that she “did act in a way tending to cause a child to become delinquent as defined in ORC §2152.02, in violation of ORC…”
In re J.A., 2018 Ohio 1609 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
In re D.P., 2017 Ohio 606 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
In re G.L.L., 2015 Ohio 3539 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(F)(5) — 2 cases
Akin v. Akin, 2011 Ohio 2765 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
In re E.H., 2016 Ohio 1186 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(I) — 2 cases
State v. Brown, 2014 Ohio 314 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
State v. R.D., 2014 Ohio 5100 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(K) — 8 cases
In re M.N., 2017 Ohio 7302 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
In re R.S., 2023 Ohio 45 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
In re A.B., 2021 Ohio 4273 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
In re J.G., 2021 Ohio 1624 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
In re D.P., 2025 Ohio 95 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(L) — 4 cases
In re Natl. Prescription Opiate Litig., 2024 Ohio 5744 (Ohio 2024).
In re M.A., 2016 Ohio 1161 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
In re A.M.P., 2016 Ohio 3546 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Carroll, 2015 Ohio 4109 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(N) — 2 cases
In re Z.W., 2018 Ohio 896 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
In re T.K., 2020 Ohio 3084 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(R) — 1 case
State v. Brown, 2014 Ohio 314 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(T) — 1 case
In re B.K., 2018 Ohio 864 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(U) — 1 case
In re J.F., 902 N.E.2d 19 (Ohio 2009).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(W) — 3 cases
State v. Nicholas, 2022 Ohio 4276 (Ohio 2022).
State v. Cunningham, 2022 Ohio 3497 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State v. L.A.B., 2021 Ohio 4323 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(X) — 4 cases
In re Anderson, 748 N.E.2d 67 (Ohio 2001).
In re Anderson, 2001 Ohio 131 (Ohio 2001).
In re J.S., 2011 Ohio 6280 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
In re C.R., 2021 Ohio 2456 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(Y) — 1 case
In re B.L., 2011 Ohio 3412 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.02(Z) — 5 cases
State v. Smith (Slip Opinion), 2022 Ohio 274 (Ohio 2022). “R.C. 2152.02(A) defines “act charged” as “the act that is identified in a complaint, indictment, or information alleging that a child is a delinquent child.”
In re H.V., 2014 Ohio 812 (Ohio 2014).
In re L.R., 2020 Ohio 2990 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
In re J.R., 2022 Ohio 2623 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
In re J.C., 2022 Ohio 2993 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.