(A) If, on or after January 1, 2008, a juvenile court adjudicates a child a delinquent child and classifies the child a juvenile offender registrant pursuant to section 2152.82 or 2152.83 of the Revised Code, before issuing the order that classifies the child a juvenile offender registrant the court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether to classify the child a tier I sex offender/child-victim offender, a tier II sex offender/child-victim offender, or a tier III sex offender/ child-victim offender.
(B) When a judge issues an order under section 2152.82 or 2152.83 of the Revised Code that classifies a delinquent child a juvenile offender registrant, in addition to the other statements and information required by the section under which the order is issued, the judge shall include in the order its determination made under division (A) of this section as to whether the child is a tier I sex offender/child-victim offender, a tier II sex offender/child-victim offender, or a tier III sex offender/child-victim offender. When a judge issues an order under section 2152.84 or 2152.85 of the Revised Code that reclassifies a delinquent child from one tier of sex offender/child-victim offender to a different tier of sex offender/child-victim offender, in addition to the other statements and information required by the section under which the order is issued, the judge shall include in the order its determination as to the reclassification of the child and the tier to which the child is reclassified.
(C) The provisions of this section do not apply to a delinquent child if the court is required to classify the child as both a juvenile offender registrant and a public registry-qualified juvenile offender registrant pursuant to section 2152.86 of the Revised Code.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 35
cases (10 in the last 5 years), 2009–2025 · leading case: In re D.R., 2014-Ohio-588.
In re D.R., 2014-Ohio-588. · cites it 6ד06 of the Revised Code and that states the determination that the judge makes at the hearing held pursuant to section 2152.831 of the Revised Code as to whether the child is a tier I sex offender/child-victim offender, a tier II sex offender/child-victim offender, or a tier III…”
In re D.R., 2022-Ohio-4493, 225 N.E.3d 894. · cites it 2דUnder R.C. 2152.831, a juvenile court exercises discretion to determine which classification level it will initially impose.”
In re T.M., 2016-Ohio-162. · cites it 4ד" The juvenile court is required to hold a hearing under R.C. 2152.831 to determine whether the juvenile should be classified as a Tier I, Tier II, or Tier III juvenile sex offender.”
In re Z.M., 2022-Ohio-194. · cites it 4דhe disposition and of any treatment provided for the child, to determine the risks that the child might re- offend, to determine whether the prior classification of the child as a juvenile offender registrant should be continued or terminated as provided under division (A)(2) of…”
In re W.Z., 957 N.E.2d 367 (Ohio Ct. App. 6th Dist. 2011). · cites it 2דSection 2152.831 of the Revised Code does not apply regarding an order issued under division (A)(1), (2), or (3) of this section.”
In re D.S., 2014-Ohio-867. · cites it 6ד{¶16} "(2) Prior to issuing the order required by division (A)(2) of this section, the judge shall conduct a hearing under section 2152.831 of the Revised Code, except as otherwise provided in that section, to determine whether the child is a tier I sex offender/child-victim…”
In re Antwon C., 912 N.E.2d 182 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 2009). “First, under R.C. 2152.831 it exercised no discretion when it categorized Antwon as a Tier II sexual offender.”
In re J.W., 2020-Ohio-4065. “83 only applies if the “court was not required to classify the child a child juvenile offender registrant under [R.”
In re T.U., 2016-Ohio-7104. · cites it 6דPrior to issuing the order required by division (A) of this section, the judge shall conduct a hearing under section 2152.831 of the Revised Code to determine whether the child is a tier I sex offender/child-victim offender, -19- a tier II sex offender/child victim offender, or…”
In re K.T., 2019-Ohio-4258. “83(C) and R.C. 2152.831. “Which tier such an offender is placed in rests within the juvenile court’s discretion.”
In re S.W.E., 2021-Ohio-80. “that if he was adjudicated delinquent for rape, sex-offender classification and registration would be mandatory, nor did counsel tell S.W.E. that being adjudicated delinquent for rape could result in his detention until he turned 21 years of age.”
In re P.C., 2020-Ohio-6791. · cites it 2ד85 of the Revised Code, classifies a tier III sex offender/child-victim offender relative to the offense.”
In re D.R., 2022-Ohio-4493, 225 N.E.3d 894. “Under R.C. 2152.831, a juvenile court exercises discretion to determine which classification level it will initially impose.”
In re D.R., 2014-Ohio-588. “06 of the Revised Code and that states the determination that the judge makes at the hearing held pursuant to section 2152.831 of the Revised Code as to whether the child is a tier I sex offender/child-victim offender, a tier II sex offender/child-victim offender, or a tier III…”
In re T.M., 2016-Ohio-162. “" The juvenile court is required to hold a hearing under R.C. 2152.831 to determine whether the juvenile should be classified as a Tier I, Tier II, or Tier III juvenile sex offender.”
In re D.R., 2014-Ohio-588. “06 of the Revised Code and that states the determination that the judge makes at the hearing held pursuant to section 2152.831 of the Revised Code as to whether the child is a tier I sex offender/child-victim offender, a tier II sex offender/child-victim offender, or a tier III…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.