Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02 (2026)

Privileged communications

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The following persons shall not testify in certain respects:

(A)(1) An attorney, concerning a communication made to the attorney by a client in that relation or concerning the attorney's advice to a client, except that the attorney may testify by express consent of the client or, if the client is deceased, by the express consent of the surviving spouse or the executor or administrator of the estate of the deceased client. However, if the client voluntarily reveals the substance of attorney-client communications in a nonprivileged context or is deemed by section 2151.421 of the Revised Code to have waived any testimonial privilege under this division, the attorney may be compelled to testify on the same subject.

The testimonial privilege established under this division does not apply concerning either of the following:

(a) A communication between a client in a capital case, as defined in section 2901.02 of the Revised Code, and the client's attorney if the communication is relevant to a subsequent ineffective assistance of counsel claim by the client alleging that the attorney did not effectively represent the client in the case;

(b) A communication between a client who has since died and the deceased client's attorney if the communication is relevant to a dispute between parties who claim through that deceased client, regardless of whether the claims are by testate or intestate succession or by inter vivos transaction, and the dispute addresses the competency of the deceased client when the deceased client executed a document that is the basis of the dispute or whether the deceased client was a victim of fraud, undue influence, or duress when the deceased client executed a document that is the basis of the dispute.

(2) An attorney, concerning a communication made to the attorney by a client in that relationship or the attorney's advice to a client, except that if the client is an insurance company, the attorney may be compelled to testify, subject to an in camera inspection by a court, about communications made by the client to the attorney or by the attorney to the client that are related to the attorney's aiding or furthering an ongoing or future commission of bad faith by the client, if the party seeking disclosure of the communications has made a prima-facie showing of bad faith, fraud, or criminal misconduct by the client.

(B)(1) A physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or dentist concerning a communication made to the physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or dentist by a patient in that relation or the advice of a physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or dentist given to a patient, except as otherwise provided in this division, division (B)(2), and division (B)(3) of this section, and except that, if the patient is deemed by section 2151.421 of the Revised Code to have waived any testimonial privilege under this division, the physician or advanced practice registered nurse may be compelled to testify on the same subject.

The testimonial privilege established under this division does not apply, and a physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or dentist may testify or may be compelled to testify, in any of the following circumstances:

(a) In any civil action, in accordance with the discovery provisions of the Rules of Civil Procedure in connection with a civil action, or in connection with a claim under Chapter 4123. of the Revised Code, under any of the following circumstances:

(i) If the patient or the guardian or other legal representative of the patient gives express consent;

(ii) If the patient is deceased, the spouse of the patient or the executor or administrator of the patient's estate gives express consent;

(iii) If a medical claim, dental claim, chiropractic claim, or optometric claim, as defined in section 2305.113 of the Revised Code, an action for wrongful death, any other type of civil action, or a claim under Chapter 4123. of the Revised Code is filed by the patient, the personal representative of the estate of the patient if deceased, or the patient's guardian or other legal representative.

(b) In any civil action concerning court-ordered treatment or services received by a patient, if the court-ordered treatment or services were ordered as part of a case plan journalized under section 2151.412 of the Revised Code or the court-ordered treatment or services are necessary or relevant to dependency, neglect, or abuse or temporary or permanent custody proceedings under Chapter 2151. of the Revised Code.

(c) In any criminal action concerning any test or the results of any test that determines the presence or concentration of alcohol, a drug of abuse, a combination of them, a controlled substance, or a metabolite of a controlled substance in the patient's whole blood, blood serum or plasma, breath, urine, oral fluid, or other bodily substance at any time relevant to the criminal offense in question.

(d) In any criminal action against a physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or dentist. In such an action, the testimonial privilege established under this division does not prohibit the admission into evidence, in accordance with the Rules of Evidence, of a patient's medical or dental records or other communications between a patient and the physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or dentist that are related to the action and obtained by subpoena, search warrant, or other lawful means. A court that permits or compels a physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or dentist to testify in such an action or permits the introduction into evidence of patient records or other communications in such an action shall require that appropriate measures be taken to ensure that the confidentiality of any patient named or otherwise identified in the records is maintained. Measures to ensure confidentiality that may be taken by the court include sealing its records or deleting specific information from its records.

(e)(i) If the communication was between a patient who has since died and the deceased patient's physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or dentist, the communication is relevant to a dispute between parties who claim through that deceased patient, regardless of whether the claims are by testate or intestate succession or by inter vivos transaction, and the dispute addresses the competency of the deceased patient when the deceased patient executed a document that is the basis of the dispute or whether the deceased patient was a victim of fraud, undue influence, or duress when the deceased patient executed a document that is the basis of the dispute.

(ii) If neither the spouse of a patient nor the executor or administrator of that patient's estate gives consent under division (B)(1)(a)(ii) of this section, testimony or the disclosure of the patient's medical records by a physician, advanced practice registered nurse, dentist, or other health care provider under division (B)(1)(e)(i) of this section is a permitted use or disclosure of protected health information, as defined in 45 C.F.R. 160.103, and an authorization or opportunity to be heard shall not be required.

(iii) Division (B)(1)(e)(i) of this section does not require a mental health professional to disclose psychotherapy notes, as defined in 45 C.F.R. 164.501.

(iv) An interested person who objects to testimony or disclosure under division (B)(1)(e)(i) of this section may seek a protective order pursuant to Civil Rule 26.

(v) A person to whom protected health information is disclosed under division (B)(1)(e)(i) of this section shall not use or disclose the protected health information for any purpose other than the litigation or proceeding for which the information was requested and shall return the protected health information to the covered entity or destroy the protected health information, including all copies made, at the conclusion of the litigation or proceeding.

(2)(a) If any law enforcement officer submits a written statement to a health care provider that states that an official criminal investigation has begun regarding a specified person or that a criminal action or proceeding has been commenced against a specified person, that requests the provider to supply to the officer copies of any records the provider possesses that pertain to any test or the results of any test administered to the specified person to determine the presence or concentration of alcohol, a drug of abuse, a combination of them, a controlled substance, or a metabolite of a controlled substance in the person's whole blood, blood serum or plasma, breath, oral fluid, or urine at any time relevant to the criminal offense in question, and that conforms to section 2317.022 of the Revised Code, the provider, except to the extent specifically prohibited by any law of this state or of the United States, shall supply to the officer a copy of any of the requested records the provider possesses. If the health care provider does not possess any of the requested records, the provider shall give the officer a written statement that indicates that the provider does not possess any of the requested records.

(b) If a health care provider possesses any records of the type described in division (B)(2)(a) of this section regarding the person in question at any time relevant to the criminal offense in question, in lieu of personally testifying as to the results of the test in question, the custodian of the records may submit a certified copy of the records, and, upon its submission, the certified copy is qualified as authentic evidence and may be admitted as evidence in accordance with the Rules of Evidence. Division (A) of section 2317.422 of the Revised Code does not apply to any certified copy of records submitted in accordance with this division. Nothing in this division shall be construed to limit the right of any party to call as a witness the person who administered the test to which the records pertain, the person under whose supervision the test was administered, the custodian of the records, the person who made the records, or the person under whose supervision the records were made.

(3)(a) If the testimonial privilege described in division (B)(1) of this section does not apply as provided in division (B)(1)(a)(iii) of this section, a physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or dentist may be compelled to testify or to submit to discovery under the Rules of Civil Procedure only as to a communication made to the physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or dentist by the patient in question in that relation, or the advice of the physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or dentist given to the patient in question, that related causally or historically to physical or mental injuries that are relevant to issues in the medical claim, dental claim, chiropractic claim, or optometric claim, action for wrongful death, other civil action, or claim under Chapter 4123. of the Revised Code.

(b) If the testimonial privilege described in division (B)(1) of this section does not apply to a physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or dentist as provided in division (B)(1)(c) of this section, the physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or dentist, in lieu of personally testifying as to the results of the test in question, may submit a certified copy of those results, and, upon its submission, the certified copy is qualified as authentic evidence and may be admitted as evidence in accordance with the Rules of Evidence. Division (A) of section 2317.422 of the Revised Code does not apply to any certified copy of results submitted in accordance with this division. Nothing in this division shall be construed to limit the right of any party to call as a witness the person who administered the test in question, the person under whose supervision the test was administered, the custodian of the results of the test, the person who compiled the results, or the person under whose supervision the results were compiled.

(4) The testimonial privilege described in division (B)(1) of this section is not waived when a communication is made by a physician or advanced practice registered nurse to a pharmacist or when there is communication between a patient and a pharmacist in furtherance of the physician-patient or advanced practice registered nurse-patient relation.

(5)(a) As used in divisions (B)(1) to (4) of this section, "communication" means acquiring, recording, or transmitting any information, in any manner, concerning any facts, opinions, or statements necessary to enable a physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or dentist to diagnose, treat, prescribe, or act for a patient. A "communication" may include, but is not limited to, any medical or dental, office, or hospital communication such as a record, chart, letter, memorandum, laboratory test and results, x-ray, photograph, financial statement, diagnosis, or prognosis.

(b) As used in division (B)(2) of this section, "health care provider" means a hospital, ambulatory care facility, long-term care facility, pharmacy, emergency facility, or health care practitioner.

(c) As used in division (B)(5)(b) of this section:

(i) "Ambulatory care facility" means a facility that provides medical, diagnostic, or surgical treatment to patients who do not require hospitalization, including a dialysis center, ambulatory surgical facility, cardiac catheterization facility, diagnostic imaging center, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy center, home health agency, inpatient hospice, birthing center, radiation therapy center, emergency facility, and an urgent care center. "Ambulatory health care facility" does not include the private office of a physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or dentist, whether the office is for an individual or group practice.

(ii) "Emergency facility" means a hospital emergency department or any other facility that provides emergency medical services.

(iii) "Health care practitioner" has the same meaning as in section 4769.01 of the Revised Code.

(iv) "Hospital" has the same meaning as in section 3727.01 of the Revised Code.

(v) "Long-term care facility" means a nursing home, residential care facility, or home for the aging, as those terms are defined in section 3721.01 of the Revised Code; a residential facility licensed under section 5119.34 of the Revised Code that provides accommodations, supervision, and personal care services for three to sixteen unrelated adults; a nursing facility, as defined in section 5165.01 of the Revised Code; a skilled nursing facility, as defined in section 5165.01 of the Revised Code; and an intermediate care facility for individuals with intellectual disabilities, as defined in section 5124.01 of the Revised Code.

(vi) "Pharmacy" has the same meaning as in section 4729.01 of the Revised Code.

(d) As used in divisions (B)(1) and (2) of this section, "drug of abuse" has the same meaning as in section 4506.01 of the Revised Code.

(6) Divisions (B)(1), (2), (3), (4), and (5) of this section apply to doctors of medicine, doctors of osteopathic medicine, doctors of podiatry, advanced practice registered nurses, and dentists.

(7) Nothing in divisions (B)(1) to (6) of this section affects, or shall be construed as affecting, the immunity from civil liability conferred by section 307.628 of the Revised Code or the immunity from civil liability conferred by section 2305.33 of the Revised Code upon physicians or advanced practice registered nurses who report an employee's use of a drug of abuse, or a condition of an employee other than one involving the use of a drug of abuse, to the employer of the employee in accordance with division (B) of that section. As used in division (B)(7) of this section, "employee," "employer," and "physician" have the same meanings as in section 2305.33 of the Revised Code and "advanced practice registered nurse" has the same meaning as in section 4723.01 of the Revised Code.

(C)(1) A cleric, when the cleric remains accountable to the authority of that cleric's church, denomination, or sect, concerning a confession made, or any information confidentially communicated, to the cleric for a religious counseling purpose in the cleric's professional character. The cleric may testify by express consent of the person making the communication, except when the disclosure of the information is in violation of a sacred trust and except that, if the person voluntarily testifies or is deemed by division (A)(4)(c) of section 2151.421 of the Revised Code to have waived any testimonial privilege under this division, the cleric may be compelled to testify on the same subject except when disclosure of the information is in violation of a sacred trust.

(2) As used in division (C) of this section:

(a) "Cleric" means a member of the clergy, rabbi, priest, Christian Science practitioner, or regularly ordained, accredited, or licensed minister of an established and legally cognizable church, denomination, or sect.

(b) "Sacred trust" means a confession or confidential communication made to a cleric in the cleric's ecclesiastical capacity in the course of discipline enjoined by the church to which the cleric belongs, including, but not limited to, the Catholic Church, if both of the following apply:

(i) The confession or confidential communication was made directly to the cleric.

(ii) The confession or confidential communication was made in the manner and context that places the cleric specifically and strictly under a level of confidentiality that is considered inviolate by canon law or church doctrine.

(D) Husband or wife, concerning any communication made by one to the other, or an act done by either in the presence of the other, during coverture, unless the communication was made, or act done, in the known presence or hearing of a third person competent to be a witness; and such rule is the same if the marital relation has ceased to exist;

(E) A person who assigns a claim or interest, concerning any matter in respect to which the person would not, if a party, be permitted to testify;

(F) A person who, if a party, would be restricted under section 2317.03 of the Revised Code, when the property or thing is sold or transferred by an executor, administrator, guardian, trustee, heir, devisee, or legatee, shall be restricted in the same manner in any action or proceeding concerning the property or thing.

(G)(1) A school guidance counselor who holds a valid educator license from the state board of education as provided for in section 3319.22 of the Revised Code, a person licensed under Chapter 4757. of the Revised Code as a licensed professional clinical counselor, licensed professional counselor, social worker, independent social worker, marriage and family therapist or independent marriage and family therapist, or registered under Chapter 4757. of the Revised Code as a social work assistant concerning a confidential communication received from a client in that relation or the person's advice to a client unless any of the following applies:

(a) The communication or advice indicates clear and present danger to the client or other persons. For the purposes of this division, cases in which there are indications of present or past child abuse or neglect of the client constitute a clear and present danger.

(b) The client gives express consent to the testimony.

(c) If the client is deceased, the surviving spouse or the executor or administrator of the estate of the deceased client gives express consent.

(d) The client voluntarily testifies, in which case the school guidance counselor or person licensed or registered under Chapter 4757. of the Revised Code may be compelled to testify on the same subject.

(e) The court in camera determines that the information communicated by the client is not germane to the counselor-client, marriage and family therapist-client, or social worker-client relationship.

(f) A court, in an action brought against a school, its administration, or any of its personnel by the client, rules after an in-camera inspection that the testimony of the school guidance counselor is relevant to that action.

(g) The testimony is sought in a civil action and concerns court-ordered treatment or services received by a patient as part of a case plan journalized under section 2151.412 of the Revised Code or the court-ordered treatment or services are necessary or relevant to dependency, neglect, or abuse or temporary or permanent custody proceedings under Chapter 2151. of the Revised Code.

(2) Nothing in division (G)(1) of this section shall relieve a school guidance counselor or a person licensed or registered under Chapter 4757. of the Revised Code from the requirement to report information concerning child abuse or neglect under section 2151.421 of the Revised Code.

(H) A mediator acting under a mediation order issued under division (A) of section 3109.052 of the Revised Code or otherwise issued in any proceeding for divorce, dissolution, legal separation, annulment, or the allocation of parental rights and responsibilities for the care of children, in any action or proceeding, other than a criminal, delinquency, child abuse, child neglect, or dependent child action or proceeding, that is brought by or against either parent who takes part in mediation in accordance with the order and that pertains to the mediation process, to any information discussed or presented in the mediation process, to the allocation of parental rights and responsibilities for the care of the parents' children, or to the awarding of parenting time rights in relation to their children;

(I) A communications assistant, acting within the scope of the communication assistant's authority, when providing telecommunications relay service pursuant to section 4931.06 of the Revised Code or Title II of the "Communications Act of 1934," 104 Stat. 366 (1990), 47 U.S.C. 225, concerning a communication made through a telecommunications relay service. Nothing in this section shall limit the obligation of a communications assistant to divulge information or testify when mandated by federal law or regulation or pursuant to subpoena in a criminal proceeding.

Nothing in this section shall limit any immunity or privilege granted under federal law or regulation.

(J)(1) A chiropractor in a civil proceeding concerning a communication made to the chiropractor by a patient in that relation or the chiropractor's advice to a patient, except as otherwise provided in this division. The testimonial privilege established under this division does not apply, and a chiropractor may testify or may be compelled to testify, in any civil action, in accordance with the discovery provisions of the Rules of Civil Procedure in connection with a civil action, or in connection with a claim under Chapter 4123. of the Revised Code, under any of the following circumstances:

(a) If the patient or the guardian or other legal representative of the patient gives express consent.

(b) If the patient is deceased, the spouse of the patient or the executor or administrator of the patient's estate gives express consent.

(c) If a medical claim, dental claim, chiropractic claim, or optometric claim, as defined in section 2305.113 of the Revised Code, an action for wrongful death, any other type of civil action, or a claim under Chapter 4123. of the Revised Code is filed by the patient, the personal representative of the estate of the patient if deceased, or the patient's guardian or other legal representative.

(2) If the testimonial privilege described in division (J)(1) of this section does not apply as provided in division (J)(1)(c) of this section, a chiropractor may be compelled to testify or to submit to discovery under the Rules of Civil Procedure only as to a communication made to the chiropractor by the patient in question in that relation, or the chiropractor's advice to the patient in question, that related causally or historically to physical or mental injuries that are relevant to issues in the medical claim, dental claim, chiropractic claim, or optometric claim, action for wrongful death, other civil action, or claim under Chapter 4123. of the Revised Code.

(3) The testimonial privilege established under this division does not apply, and a chiropractor may testify or be compelled to testify, in any criminal action or administrative proceeding.

(4) As used in this division, "communication" means acquiring, recording, or transmitting any information, in any manner, concerning any facts, opinions, or statements necessary to enable a chiropractor to diagnose, treat, or act for a patient. A communication may include, but is not limited to, any chiropractic, office, or hospital communication such as a record, chart, letter, memorandum, laboratory test and results, x-ray, photograph, financial statement, diagnosis, or prognosis.

(K)(1) Except as provided under division (K)(2) of this section, a critical incident stress management team member concerning a communication received from an individual who receives crisis response services from the team member, or the team member's advice to the individual, during a debriefing session.

(2) The testimonial privilege established under division (K)(1) of this section does not apply if any of the following are true:

(a) The communication or advice indicates clear and present danger to the individual who receives crisis response services or to other persons. For purposes of this division, cases in which there are indications of present or past child abuse or neglect of the individual constitute a clear and present danger.

(b) The individual who received crisis response services gives express consent to the testimony.

(c) If the individual who received crisis response services is deceased, the surviving spouse or the executor or administrator of the estate of the deceased individual gives express consent.

(d) The individual who received crisis response services voluntarily testifies, in which case the team member may be compelled to testify on the same subject.

(e) The court in camera determines that the information communicated by the individual who received crisis response services is not germane to the relationship between the individual and the team member.

(f) The communication or advice pertains or is related to any criminal act.

(3) As used in division (K) of this section:

(a) "Crisis response services" means consultation, risk assessment, referral, and on-site crisis intervention services provided by a critical incident stress management team to individuals affected by crisis or disaster.

(b) "Critical incident stress management team member" or "team member" means an individual specially trained to provide crisis response services as a member of an organized community or local crisis response team that holds membership in the Ohio critical incident stress management network.

(c) "Debriefing session" means a session at which crisis response services are rendered by a critical incident stress management team member during or after a crisis or disaster.

(L)(1) Subject to division (L)(2) of this section and except as provided in division (L)(3) of this section, an employee assistance professional, concerning a communication made to the employee assistance professional by a client in the employee assistance professional's official capacity as an employee assistance professional.

(2) Division (L)(1) of this section applies to an employee assistance professional who meets either or both of the following requirements:

(a) Is certified by the employee assistance certification commission to engage in the employee assistance profession;

(b) Has education, training, and experience in all of the following:

(i) Providing workplace-based services designed to address employer and employee productivity issues;

(ii) Providing assistance to employees and employees' dependents in identifying and finding the means to resolve personal problems that affect the employees or the employees' performance;

(iii) Identifying and resolving productivity problems associated with an employee's concerns about any of the following matters: health, marriage, family, finances, substance abuse or other addiction, workplace, law, and emotional issues;

(iv) Selecting and evaluating available community resources;

(v) Making appropriate referrals;

(vi) Local and national employee assistance agreements;

(vii) Client confidentiality.

(3) Division (L)(1) of this section does not apply to any of the following:

(a) A criminal action or proceeding involving an offense under sections 2903.01 to 2903.06 of the Revised Code if the employee assistance professional's disclosure or testimony relates directly to the facts or immediate circumstances of the offense;

(b) A communication made by a client to an employee assistance professional that reveals the contemplation or commission of a crime or serious, harmful act;

(c) A communication that is made by a client who is an unemancipated minor or an adult adjudicated to be incompetent and indicates that the client was the victim of a crime or abuse;

(d) A civil proceeding to determine an individual's mental competency or a criminal action in which a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity is entered;

(e) A civil or criminal malpractice action brought against the employee assistance professional;

(f) When the employee assistance professional has the express consent of the client or, if the client is deceased or disabled, the client's legal representative;

(g) When the testimonial privilege otherwise provided by division (L)(1) of this section is abrogated under law.

Last updated January 16, 2025 at 3:19 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 526 cases (101 in the last 5 years), 1953–2026 · leading case: Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P. v. Givaudan Flavors Corp., 2010 Ohio 4469 (Ohio 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P. v. Givaudan Flavors Corp., 2010 Ohio 4469 (Ohio 2010). · cites it 43× “After acknowledging that the General Assembly had codified the common-law attorney-client privilege in R.C. 2317.02, the court noted that “the attorney-client privilege only exists to aid in the administration of justice.”
State v. Jones, 2000 Ohio 187 (Ohio 2000). · cites it 28× “22’s predecessor created an exception to the physician-patient privilege in R.C. 2317.02. This view is unsupported by either the disclosure statute or the privilege statute.”
Torres Friedenberg v. Friedenberg (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 3345 (Ohio 2020). · cites it 39× “] Application of physician-patient privilege, R.C. 2317.02(B), in domestic-relations cases that include claims for child custody or spousal support—Court of appeals’ judgment upholding trial court’s order compelling release, subject to protective order, of relevant medical…”
Ward v. Summa Health Sys., 2010 Ohio 6275 (Ohio 2010). · cites it 23× “It states as follows: {¶ 17} “The following persons shall not testify in certain respects: {¶ 18} “* * * {¶ 19} “(B)(1) A physician or a dentist concerning a communication made to the physician or dentist by a patient in that relation or the physician's or dentist's advice to a…”
State v. Brunson, 2022 Ohio 4299 (Ohio 2022). · cites it 17× “The recorded statement is protected by the attorney-client privilege {¶ 32} After reviewing the facts surrounding the recorded statement, we hold that Lake did not waive his attorney-client privilege, because the communication between Lake and his attorney that was recorded and…”
State v. Mayl, 833 N.E.2d 1216 (Ohio 2005). · cites it 18× “*216 {¶ 54} Before R.C. 2317.02(B), relating to patient-physician privilege, was amended, blood-alcohol tests were not available in criminal prosecutions unless the privilege was waived by a defendant.”
Turk v. Oiler, 732 F. Supp. 2d 758 (N.D. Ohio 2010). · cites it 51× “ANALYSIS In Counts Two and Three of the Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs allege that the Cleveland Clinic Defendants: (1) released Plaintiffs’ confidential medical information in response to the grand jury subpoena in violation of their duties set forth in O.R.C. § 2317.02 and…”
Roe v. Planned Parenthood Sw. Ohio Region, 2009 Ohio 2973 (Ohio 2009). · cites it 20× “{¶ 2} The confidential abuse reports and medical records at issue are privileged from disclosure per R.C. 2317.02 and former 2151.421(H)(1). Redaction of personal, identifying information does not remove the privileged status of the records.”
Jackson v. Greger, 110 Ohio St. 3d 488 (Ohio 2006). · cites it 18× “1 {¶ 8} R.C. 2317.02 provides: {¶ 9} “The following persons shall not testify in certain respects: {¶ 10} “(A) An attorney, concerning a communication made to the attorney by a client in that relation or the attorney’s advice to a client, except that the attorney may testify by…”
Med. Mut. of Ohio v. Schlotterer, 2009 Ohio 2496 (Ohio 2009). · cites it 12× “The court of appeals held that the order to comply with the discovery requests for the medical records violated the physician-patient privilege, as codified in R.C. 2317.02(B)(1). Id. at ¶ 36. We accepted Medical Mutual’s discretionary appeal.”
Skorvanek v. Dept. of Rehab & Corr., 2018 Ohio 3870 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 18× “26(C) motion for a protective order, arguing Creech's mental health record was protected from production pursuant to the physician-patient privilege in R.C. 2317.02. Appellant filed a memorandum in support of disclosure on April 14, 2016, asserting Creech's assault on appellant…”
State v. Hancock, 840 N.E.2d 1032 (Ohio 2006). · cites it 6× “Lehrer’s testimony violated the physician-patient privilege established by R.C. 2317.02(B)(1). 1 {¶ 57} Hancock concedes that his communications to Dr.”
Show all 526 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(3)(a) — 1 case
Schauf v. Estes Express Lines, Inc. (S.D. Ohio 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(A) — 130 cases
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P. v. Givaudan Flavors Corp., 2010 Ohio 4469 (Ohio 2010). “After acknowledging that the General Assembly had codified the common-law attorney-client privilege in R.C. 2317.02, the court noted that “the attorney-client privilege only exists to aid in the administration of justice.”
State v. Brunson, 2022 Ohio 4299 (Ohio 2022). “The recorded statement is protected by the attorney-client privilege {¶ 32} After reviewing the facts surrounding the recorded statement, we hold that Lake did not waive his attorney-client privilege, because the communication between Lake and his attorney that was recorded and…”
Jackson v. Greger, 110 Ohio St. 3d 488 (Ohio 2006). “1 {¶ 8} R.C. 2317.02 provides: {¶ 9} “The following persons shall not testify in certain respects: {¶ 10} “(A) An attorney, concerning a communication made to the attorney by a client in that relation or the attorney’s advice to a client, except that the attorney may testify by…”
Grace v. Mastruserio, 912 N.E.2d 608 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007).
State ex rel. Leslie v. Ohio Hous. Fin. Agency, 105 Ohio St. 3d 261 (Ohio 2005).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(A)(1) — 24 cases
State v. Tench, 123 N.E.3d 955 (Ohio 2018).
State v. Tench (Slip Opinion), 2018 Ohio 5205 (Ohio 2018).
State v. Brunson, 2022 Ohio 4299 (Ohio 2022). “The recorded statement is protected by the attorney-client privilege {¶ 32} After reviewing the facts surrounding the recorded statement, we hold that Lake did not waive his attorney-client privilege, because the communication between Lake and his attorney that was recorded and…”
State v. Verbanac, 2022 Ohio 3743 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Hale, 2019 Ohio 3276 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(A)(1)(a) — 2 cases
State v. Tench, 123 N.E.3d 955 (Ohio 2018).
State v. Tench (Slip Opinion), 2018 Ohio 5205 (Ohio 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(A)(1)(b) — 2 cases
Zimpfer v. Roach, 2017 Ohio 8437 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
In re Hasenfratz, 2025 Ohio 2372 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(A)(2) — 11 cases
State v. Brunson, 2022 Ohio 4299 (Ohio 2022). “The recorded statement is protected by the attorney-client privilege {¶ 32} After reviewing the facts surrounding the recorded statement, we hold that Lake did not waive his attorney-client privilege, because the communication between Lake and his attorney that was recorded and…”
Summit Park Apts., L.L.C. v. Great Lakes Reinsurance, 2016 Ohio 1514 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
A. Morgan Bldg. Grp., L.L.C. v. Owners Ins. Co., 2023 Ohio 3133 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
Eddy v. Farmers Prop. Cas. Ins. Co., 2026 Ohio 626 (Ohio 2026).
Schiff v. Dickson, 2013 Ohio 5253 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(A)(2)(b) — 1 case
Skorvanek v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2017 Ohio 2694 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2017).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B) — 142 cases
State v. Jones, 2000 Ohio 187 (Ohio 2000). “22’s predecessor created an exception to the physician-patient privilege in R.C. 2317.02. This view is unsupported by either the disclosure statute or the privilege statute.”
Ward v. Summa Health Sys., 2010 Ohio 6275 (Ohio 2010). “It states as follows: {¶ 17} “The following persons shall not testify in certain respects: {¶ 18} “* * * {¶ 19} “(B)(1) A physician or a dentist concerning a communication made to the physician or dentist by a patient in that relation or the physician's or dentist's advice to a…”
Turk v. Oiler, 732 F. Supp. 2d 758 (N.D. Ohio 2010). “ANALYSIS In Counts Two and Three of the Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs allege that the Cleveland Clinic Defendants: (1) released Plaintiffs’ confidential medical information in response to the grand jury subpoena in violation of their duties set forth in O.R.C. § 2317.02 and…”
Skorvanek v. Dept. of Rehab & Corr., 2018 Ohio 3870 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “26(C) motion for a protective order, arguing Creech's mental health record was protected from production pursuant to the physician-patient privilege in R.C. 2317.02. Appellant filed a memorandum in support of disclosure on April 14, 2016, asserting Creech's assault on appellant…”
State v. Dress, 461 N.E.2d 1312 (Ohio Ct. App. 1982).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(1) — 88 cases
State v. Hancock, 840 N.E.2d 1032 (Ohio 2006). “Lehrer’s testimony violated the physician-patient privilege established by R.C. 2317.02(B)(1). 1 {¶ 57} Hancock concedes that his communications to Dr.”
Med. Mut. of Ohio v. Schlotterer, 2009 Ohio 2496 (Ohio 2009). “The court of appeals held that the order to comply with the discovery requests for the medical records violated the physician-patient privilege, as codified in R.C. 2317.02(B)(1). Id. at ¶ 36. We accepted Medical Mutual’s discretionary appeal.”
Grove v. Ne. Ohio Nephrology Assocs., Inc., 844 N.E.2d 400 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).
State v. Morris, 2012 Ohio 2407 (Ohio 2012).
Torres Friedenberg v. Friedenberg (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 3345 (Ohio 2020). “] Application of physician-patient privilege, R.C. 2317.02(B), in domestic-relations cases that include claims for child custody or spousal support—Court of appeals’ judgment upholding trial court’s order compelling release, subject to protective order, of relevant medical…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(1)(3) — 1 case
Wargo v. Buck, 703 N.E.2d 811 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(1)(a) — 18 cases
State v. Jones, 2000 Ohio 187 (Ohio 2000). “22’s predecessor created an exception to the physician-patient privilege in R.C. 2317.02. This view is unsupported by either the disclosure statute or the privilege statute.”
Torres Friedenberg v. Friedenberg (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 3345 (Ohio 2020). “] Application of physician-patient privilege, R.C. 2317.02(B), in domestic-relations cases that include claims for child custody or spousal support—Court of appeals’ judgment upholding trial court’s order compelling release, subject to protective order, of relevant medical…”
Grove v. Ne. Ohio Nephrology Assocs., Inc., 844 N.E.2d 400 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).
Skorvanek v. Dept. of Rehab & Corr., 2018 Ohio 3870 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “26(C) motion for a protective order, arguing Creech's mental health record was protected from production pursuant to the physician-patient privilege in R.C. 2317.02. Appellant filed a memorandum in support of disclosure on April 14, 2016, asserting Creech's assault on appellant…”
In re Miller, 585 N.E.2d 396 (Ohio 1992).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(1)(a)(i) — 6 cases
Med. Mut. of Ohio v. Schlotterer, 2009 Ohio 2496 (Ohio 2009). “The court of appeals held that the order to comply with the discovery requests for the medical records violated the physician-patient privilege, as codified in R.C. 2317.02(B)(1). Id. at ¶ 36. We accepted Medical Mutual’s discretionary appeal.”
Morawski v. Davis, 2023 Ohio 1898 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
Marshall v. Colonial Ins. Co., 2016 Ohio 8155 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
In re L.F., 2014 Ohio 3800 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
Schauf v. Estes Express Lines, Inc. (S.D. Ohio 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(1)(a)(ii) — 1 case
D'Amico v. Delliquadri, 683 N.E.2d 814 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(1)(a)(iii) — 24 cases
Torres Friedenberg v. Friedenberg (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 3345 (Ohio 2020). “] Application of physician-patient privilege, R.C. 2317.02(B), in domestic-relations cases that include claims for child custody or spousal support—Court of appeals’ judgment upholding trial court’s order compelling release, subject to protective order, of relevant medical…”
Leopold v. Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging Co., 2013 Ohio 3107 (Ohio 2013).
Hageman v. Sw. Gen. Health Ctr., 893 N.E.2d 153 (Ohio 2008).
Morawski v. Davis, 2023 Ohio 1898 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
Campolieti v. City of Cleveland, 921 N.E.2d 286 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(1)(b) — 12 cases
In re I.T., 2016 Ohio 555 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Mayl, 833 N.E.2d 1216 (Ohio 2005). “*216 {¶ 54} Before R.C. 2317.02(B), relating to patient-physician privilege, was amended, blood-alcohol tests were not available in criminal prosecutions unless the privilege was waived by a defendant.”
City of Middletown v. Newton, 708 N.E.2d 1086 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998).
Arnold v. Am. Nat'l Red Cross, 639 N.E.2d 484 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994).
In re Miller, 585 N.E.2d 396 (Ohio 1992).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(1)(c) — 18 cases
Turk v. Oiler, 732 F. Supp. 2d 758 (N.D. Ohio 2010). “ANALYSIS In Counts Two and Three of the Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs allege that the Cleveland Clinic Defendants: (1) released Plaintiffs’ confidential medical information in response to the grand jury subpoena in violation of their duties set forth in O.R.C. § 2317.02 and…”
In re Miller, 585 N.E.2d 396 (Ohio 1992).
State v. Little, 2014 Ohio 4871 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Clark, 2014 Ohio 4873 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Eads, 2020 Ohio 2805 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(1)(d) — 1 case
Roe v. Planned Parenthood Sw. Ohio Region, 2009 Ohio 2973 (Ohio 2009). “{¶ 2} The confidential abuse reports and medical records at issue are privileged from disclosure per R.C. 2317.02 and former 2151.421(H)(1). Redaction of personal, identifying information does not remove the privileged status of the records.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(1)(e)(v) — 1 case
Hageman v. Sw. Gen. Health Ctr., 893 N.E.2d 153 (Ohio 2008).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(1)(iii) — 1 case
McCoy v. Maxwell, 743 N.E.2d 974 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(2) — 21 cases
State v. Mayl, 833 N.E.2d 1216 (Ohio 2005). “*216 {¶ 54} Before R.C. 2317.02(B), relating to patient-physician privilege, was amended, blood-alcohol tests were not available in criminal prosecutions unless the privilege was waived by a defendant.”
State v. Gubanich, 2022 Ohio 2815 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
Skorvanek v. Dept. of Rehab & Corr., 2018 Ohio 3870 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “26(C) motion for a protective order, arguing Creech's mental health record was protected from production pursuant to the physician-patient privilege in R.C. 2317.02. Appellant filed a memorandum in support of disclosure on April 14, 2016, asserting Creech's assault on appellant…”
State v. Eads, 2020 Ohio 2805 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
State v. Meyers, 767 N.E.2d 739 (Ohio Ct. App. 2001).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(2)(a) — 18 cases
State v. Little, 2014 Ohio 4871 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Clark, 2014 Ohio 4873 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Mayl, 833 N.E.2d 1216 (Ohio 2005). “*216 {¶ 54} Before R.C. 2317.02(B), relating to patient-physician privilege, was amended, blood-alcohol tests were not available in criminal prosecutions unless the privilege was waived by a defendant.”
State v. Eads, 2020 Ohio 2805 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
State v. Gubanich, 2022 Ohio 2815 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(2)(b) — 3 cases
State v. Mayl, 833 N.E.2d 1216 (Ohio 2005). “*216 {¶ 54} Before R.C. 2317.02(B), relating to patient-physician privilege, was amended, blood-alcohol tests were not available in criminal prosecutions unless the privilege was waived by a defendant.”
Skorvanek v. Dept. of Rehab & Corr., 2018 Ohio 3870 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “26(C) motion for a protective order, arguing Creech's mental health record was protected from production pursuant to the physician-patient privilege in R.C. 2317.02. Appellant filed a memorandum in support of disclosure on April 14, 2016, asserting Creech's assault on appellant…”
Cleveland v. Khamies, 2023 Ohio 812 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(3) — 19 cases
Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Med. Ctr., 635 N.E.2d 331 (Ohio 1994).
Doe v. Univ. of Cincinnati, 538 N.E.2d 419 (Ohio Ct. App. 1988).
State v. Webb, 638 N.E.2d 1023 (Ohio 1994).
Niemann v. Cooley, 637 N.E.2d 943 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994).
Calihan v. Fullen, 604 N.E.2d 761 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(3)(a) — 32 cases
Torres Friedenberg v. Friedenberg (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 3345 (Ohio 2020). “] Application of physician-patient privilege, R.C. 2317.02(B), in domestic-relations cases that include claims for child custody or spousal support—Court of appeals’ judgment upholding trial court’s order compelling release, subject to protective order, of relevant medical…”
Leopold v. Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging Co., 2013 Ohio 3107 (Ohio 2013).
Pietrangelo v. Hudson, 2019 Ohio 1988 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
Wooten v. Westfield Ins., 907 N.E.2d 1219 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009).
Campolieti v. City of Cleveland, 921 N.E.2d 286 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(4) — 2 cases
Calihan v. Fullen, 604 N.E.2d 761 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992).
State v. Spencer, 710 N.E.2d 352 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(4)(a) — 4 cases
State v. Jones, 2000 Ohio 187 (Ohio 2000). “22’s predecessor created an exception to the physician-patient privilege in R.C. 2317.02. This view is unsupported by either the disclosure statute or the privilege statute.”
State v. Hopfer, 679 N.E.2d 321 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996).
Varghese v. Royal Maccabees Life Ins., 181 F.R.D. 359 (S.D. Ohio 1998).
State v. Jones, 2000 Ohio 187 (Ohio 2000).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(5) — 2 cases
Camacho v. Rose-Mary, Johanna Graselli Rehab., Inc., 2024 Ohio 2802 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
In Re Polen, 670 N.E.2d 572 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(5)(a) — 21 cases
Torres Friedenberg v. Friedenberg (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 3345 (Ohio 2020). “] Application of physician-patient privilege, R.C. 2317.02(B), in domestic-relations cases that include claims for child custody or spousal support—Court of appeals’ judgment upholding trial court’s order compelling release, subject to protective order, of relevant medical…”
Ingram v. Adena Health Sys., 777 N.E.2d 901 (Ohio Ct. App. 2002).
Ward v. Summa Health Sys., 2010 Ohio 6275 (Ohio 2010). “It states as follows: {¶ 17} “The following persons shall not testify in certain respects: {¶ 18} “* * * {¶ 19} “(B)(1) A physician or a dentist concerning a communication made to the physician or dentist by a patient in that relation or the physician's or dentist's advice to a…”
Skorvanek v. Dept. of Rehab & Corr., 2018 Ohio 3870 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “26(C) motion for a protective order, arguing Creech's mental health record was protected from production pursuant to the physician-patient privilege in R.C. 2317.02. Appellant filed a memorandum in support of disclosure on April 14, 2016, asserting Creech's assault on appellant…”
Turk v. Oiler, 732 F. Supp. 2d 758 (N.D. Ohio 2010). “ANALYSIS In Counts Two and Three of the Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs allege that the Cleveland Clinic Defendants: (1) released Plaintiffs’ confidential medical information in response to the grand jury subpoena in violation of their duties set forth in O.R.C. § 2317.02 and…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(5)(b) — 1 case
State v. Baker, 2026 Ohio 1628 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(6) — 1 case
Harvey v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 2017 Ohio 9226 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(l)(a) — 1 case
Turk v. Oiler, 732 F. Supp. 2d 758 (N.D. Ohio 2010). “ANALYSIS In Counts Two and Three of the Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs allege that the Cleveland Clinic Defendants: (1) released Plaintiffs’ confidential medical information in response to the grand jury subpoena in violation of their duties set forth in O.R.C. § 2317.02 and…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(l)(a)(i) — 2 cases
Med. Mut. of Ohio v. Schlotterer, 2009 Ohio 2496 (Ohio 2009). “The court of appeals held that the order to comply with the discovery requests for the medical records violated the physician-patient privilege, as codified in R.C. 2317.02(B)(1). Id. at ¶ 36. We accepted Medical Mutual’s discretionary appeal.”
Sirca v. Medina Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs., 762 N.E.2d 407 (Ohio Ct. App. 2001).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(l)(a)(iii) — 5 cases
McCoy v. Maxwell, 743 N.E.2d 974 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000).
Folmar v. Griffin, 849 N.E.2d 324 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006).
Neftzer v. Neftzer, 748 N.E.2d 608 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000).
Leopold v. Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging Co., 2013 Ohio 3107 (Ohio 2013).
Smalley v. Friedman, Damiano & Smith Co., L.P.A., 873 N.E.2d 331 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(B)(l)(c) — 1 case
Turk v. Oiler, 732 F. Supp. 2d 758 (N.D. Ohio 2010). “ANALYSIS In Counts Two and Three of the Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs allege that the Cleveland Clinic Defendants: (1) released Plaintiffs’ confidential medical information in response to the grand jury subpoena in violation of their duties set forth in O.R.C. § 2317.02 and…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(C) — 6 cases
Commonwealth v. Stewart, 690 A.2d 195 (Pa. 1997).
In Re Pieper Child., 619 N.E.2d 1059 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993).
State v. Billman, 2013 Ohio 5774 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
Alexander v. Culp, 705 N.E.2d 378 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997).
McFarland v. W. Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, Lorain, Ohio, Inc., 2016 Ohio 5462 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(C)(1) — 3 cases
McFarland v. W. Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, Lorain, Ohio, Inc., 2016 Ohio 5462 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Billman, 2013 Ohio 5774 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
State v. J.S., 2025 Ohio 4821 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(C)(1)(a) — 1 case
Niemann v. Cooley, 637 N.E.2d 943 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(C)(2)(a) — 1 case
State v. Burkard, 2025 Ohio 5787 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(C)(2)(b) — 1 case
McFarland v. W. Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, Lorain, Ohio, Inc., 2016 Ohio 5462 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(D) — 15 cases
State v. Perez, 2009 Ohio 6179 (Ohio 2009).
Toney v. City of Dayton, 2017 Ohio 5618 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
Brown v. State, 753 A.2d 84 (Md. 2000).
Hite v. Brown, 654 N.E.2d 452 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995).
Vill. of Bentleyville v. Pisani, 654 N.E.2d 394 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(D)(1) — 1 case
State v. Desper, 783 N.E.2d 939 (Ohio Ct. App. 2002).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(G) — 20 cases
In re Jones, 790 N.E.2d 321 (Ohio 2003).
In re Wieland, 733 N.E.2d 1127 (Ohio 2000).
Torres Friedenberg v. Friedenberg (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 3345 (Ohio 2020). “] Application of physician-patient privilege, R.C. 2317.02(B), in domestic-relations cases that include claims for child custody or spousal support—Court of appeals’ judgment upholding trial court’s order compelling release, subject to protective order, of relevant medical…”
Folmar v. Griffin, 849 N.E.2d 324 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006).
Banchefsky v. Banchefsky, 2014 Ohio 899 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(G)(1) — 9 cases
In re R.M., 2012 Ohio 4290 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
State v. Orwick, 790 N.E.2d 1238 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003).
Torres Friedenberg v. Friedenberg (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 3345 (Ohio 2020). “] Application of physician-patient privilege, R.C. 2317.02(B), in domestic-relations cases that include claims for child custody or spousal support—Court of appeals’ judgment upholding trial court’s order compelling release, subject to protective order, of relevant medical…”
In re Jones, 790 N.E.2d 321 (Ohio 2003).
In re H.P., 2022 Ohio 778 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(G)(1)(a) — 4 cases
State v. Orwick, 790 N.E.2d 1238 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003).
In re H.P., 2022 Ohio 778 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
In re R.M., 2012 Ohio 4290 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
State v. Orwick, 791 N.E.2d 463 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(G)(1)(d) — 3 cases
Eichenberger v. Eichenberger, 613 N.E.2d 678 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992).
State v. Wolfe, 611 N.E.2d 976 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992).
State v. Miller, 2016 Ohio 8248 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(G)(1)(g) — 3 cases
In re R.M., 2012 Ohio 4290 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
In re Jones, 790 N.E.2d 321 (Ohio 2003).
In re T.Z., 2017 Ohio 7592 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(G)(2) — 1 case
In re H.P., 2022 Ohio 778 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(G)(e) — 1 case
Hanly v. Riverside Methodist Hosp. Found., Inc., 595 N.E.2d 429 (Ohio Ct. App. 1991).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(a)(I) — 1 case
McCleery v. Leach, Unpublished Decision (4-11-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(b) — 1 case
McGregor v. McGregor, 2012 Ohio 3389 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(b)(3)(a) — 1 case
Mason v. Booker, 922 N.E.2d 1036 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(c) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Stewart, 647 A.2d 597 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1994).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.02(d) — 1 case
United States v. James Montgomery, United States of Am. v. Mary O'COnnOr, 384 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir. 2004).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.