Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2329.33 (2026)

Redemption by judgment debtor

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as provided in division (C) of section 2308.03 or any other section of the Revised Code, in sales of real estate on execution or order of sale, at any time before the confirmation thereof, the debtor may redeem it from sale by depositing in the hands of the clerk of the court of common pleas to which such execution or order is returnable, the amount of the judgment or decree upon which such lands were sold, with all costs, including poundage, and interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum on the purchase money from the day of sale to the time of such deposit, except where the judgment creditor is the purchaser, the interest at such rate on the excess above the judgment creditor's claim. The court of common pleas thereupon shall make an order setting aside such sale, and apply the deposit to the payment of such judgment or decree and costs, and award such interest to the purchaser, who shall receive from the officer making the sale the purchase money paid by the purchaser, and the interest from the clerk. This section does not take away the power of the court to set aside such sale for any reason for which it might have been set aside prior to April 16, 1888.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 48 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1965–2026 · leading case: Vieland v. First Fed. Sav. Bank (In Re Vieland), 41 B.R. 134 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Vieland v. First Fed. Sav. Bank (In Re Vieland), 41 B.R. 134 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1984). · cites it 18× “This is bare legal title, however; absent the stay the debtors would lose all interest in the property upon confirmation of the sale.”
Women's Fed. Sav. Bank v. Pappadakes, 527 N.E.2d 792 (Ohio 1988). · cites it 13× “The case subjudice, in light of the determination of the court below, requires that we consider whether the bond filed with the trial court suffices under R.C. 2329.33 2 as “the amount of the judgment or decree.”
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Roznowski (Slip Opinion), 2014 Ohio 1984 (Ohio 2014). · cites it 4× “{¶ 27} R.C. 2329.33 establishes the statutory right to redemption in foreclosure cases.”
Yidi, L.L.C. v. JHB Hotel, L.L.C., 2017 Ohio 1285 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 8× “{¶12} Importantly, however, Ohio’s receivership statute, which allows a receiver to sell real property pre-judgment free and clear of all liens, does not provide that mortgagors be given until confirmation of the sale to exercise their right of redemption.”
Whipps v. Ryan, 2014 Ohio 5302 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 7× “In his ninth assignment of error, appellant asserts that the trial court erred by (1) failing to establish, following the decree of foreclosure and order of sale but prior to filing its entry confirming sale of the property, a specified sum that would have enabled appellant to…”
Trumbull Twp. Bd. of Trs. v. Rickard, 2019 Ohio 2502 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 5× “{¶30} The Township did not, however, raise this argument in its objections to the magistrate’s decision, and as such, the Township waives the right to assign the same as error on appeal, except for claims of plain error.”
Toledo Trust Co. v. Yakumithis Enter. Inc., 519 N.E.2d 425 (Ohio Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 15× “See R.C. 2329.33. Thereupon, the trial court granted Yakumithis’ motion.”
Hausman v. City of Dayton, 653 N.E.2d 1190 (Ohio 1995). · cites it 3× “A mortgagor’s statutory right of redemption emanates from R.C. 2329.33, which provides: “In sales of real estate on execution or order of sale, at any time before the confirmation thereof, the debtor may redeem it from sale by depositing * * * the amount of the judgment or…”
Farm Credit Servs. v. Dues, 663 N.E.2d 379 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 16× “Dues (“appellants”) appeal from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Shelby County denying their motion to set aside the sale of real property pursuant to their statutory right of redemption under R.C. 2329.33 and granting the motion of Farm Credit Services of Mid-America,…”
Wilborn v. Bank One Corp., 906 N.E.2d 396 (Ohio 2009). “Kuehnle & Levey, Baldwin’s Ohio Real Estate Law (2008), Section 33:4; R.C. 2329.33; Hausman v. Dayton (1995), 73 Ohio St.”
In Re Crawford, 232 B.R. 92 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1999). · cites it 3× “See, for example, Ohio Rev.Code § 2329.33. A right to redeem *98 would not, then, be a right to cure.”
Daneman v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp. (In Re Hoff), 187 B.R. 190 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1995). · cites it 6× “O.R.C. § 2329.33. See also, Wayne Savings & Loan Co.”
Show all 48 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.