Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2506
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2506.08 (2026)

Findings and order of court on appeal

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If an appeal is taken under section 2506.05 of the Revised Code, the court may find that the order, adjudication, or decision is unconstitutional, illegal, arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable, or unsupported by the preponderance of substantial, reliable, and probative evidence on the whole record. Consistent with its findings, the court may affirm, reverse, vacate, or modify the order, adjudication, or decision, or remand the cause to the officer or body appealed from with instructions to enter an order, adjudication, or decision consistent with the findings or opinion of the court. If the order, adjudication, or decision is remanded to the officer or body appealed from with those instructions, the officer or body shall enter the consistent order, adjudication, or decision within five days after that remand. The judgment of the court may be appealed by any party on questions of law as provided in the Rules of Appellate Procedure and, to the extent not in conflict with those rules, Chapter 2505. of the Revised Code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2013–2025 · leading case: Leist v. Mad River Twp. Bd. of Trs., 2016 Ohio 2960 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Leist v. Mad River Twp. Bd. of Trs., 2016 Ohio 2960 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “” Once the final order is issued by the Mad River Board, Leist may file a new notice of appeal to the Clark County Common Pleas Court to invoke the trial court’s jurisdiction.”
Oregon Place Assn. v. Walsh-Cotton, 2013 Ohio 5461 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 5× “Cotton’s suggestion that the only standard of proof required of her pursuant to Ohio Rev.Code § 2506.08 is that of the preponderance of substantial, reliable and probative evidence on the whole record is misplaced.”
Jones v. Montgomery Cty. Educ. Serv. Ctr. Bd. of Edn., 2025 Ohio 4774 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 10× “R.C. 2506.08. {¶ 12} In addition to the foregoing requirements for an administrative appeal, a trial court must have subject matter jurisdiction to hear such an appeal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.