Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2711
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2711.05 (2026)

Hearing of application

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
October 1, 1953
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 1 - 100th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

Any application to the court of common pleas under sections 2711.01 to 2711.15, inclusive, of the Revised Code, shall be made and heard in the manner provided by law for the making and hearing of motions, except as otherwise expressly provided in such sections.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case: Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. v. Cleveland, 2024 Ohio 2651 (Ohio 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. v. Cleveland, 2024 Ohio 2651 (Ohio 2024). · cites it 9× “Indeed, this interpretation is bolstered by R.C. 2711.05, which states that applications to the court of common pleas to vacate arbitration awards shall be made “in the manner provided by law for the making * * * of motions, except as otherwise provided” in the relevant sections…”
Cox v. Dayton Pub. Schs. Bd. of Edn. (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 5505 (Ohio 2016). · cites it 2× “13; R.C. 2711.05. Under the applicable Civil Rules and statutes, Cox successfully served the BOE within the three-month period under R.”
Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. v. Cleveland, 2022 Ohio 1403 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “In affirming the trial court’s judgment, we explained: R.C. 2711.05 mandates that applications for orders under R.”
Chrysler Fin. Servs. v. Henderson, 2011 Ohio 6813 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011). “{¶ 18} We further observe that R.C. 2711.05 provides: Any application to the court of common pleas under sections 2711.”
BST Ohio Corp. v. Wolgang (Slip Opinion), 2021 Ohio 1785 (Ohio 2021). “A different section of Ohio’s arbitration law, R.C. 2711.05, is helpful however. It states: 5.”
Russo v. Chittick, 548 N.E.2d 314 (Ohio Ct. App. 1988). “The statute causes an arbitration award to become a judgment through a summary proceeding by filing a motion to confirm if made within one year of the arbitrators’ decision.”
Hughes v. Hughes, 2020 Ohio 5026 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “As to the compulsory counterclaim issue, this court determined that the civil rules that apply to special proceedings brought pursuant to R.C. 2711.05 et seq. are those pertaining to motions, not pleadings.”
Cleveland Police Patrolmen's Ass'n v. City of Cleveland, 649 N.E.2d 1291 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994). “15; see, also, R.C. 2711.05. This is necessary to conserve judicial economy, and avoid dismissing the complaint and only to have the plaintiff turn around and refile it with the missing documents: In the instant case the record shows that the arbitration award was filed at the…”
Youngstown State Univ. v. Youngstown State Univ. Assn. of Classified Emps., 2013 Ohio 5862 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). “R.C. 2711.05. Unrelated to R.C. 2711.06, there are arbitration statutes which provide the right to appeal from certain orders concerning arbitration.”
Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. v. Cleveland, 2024 Ohio 2651 (Ohio 2024). · cites it 9× “Indeed, this interpretation is bolstered by R.C. 2711.05, which states that applications to the court of common pleas to vacate arbitration awards shall be made “in the manner provided by law for the making .”
EAP Ohio, L.L.C. v. Wild 'N Wooly Acres, Inc., 2024 Ohio 5906 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 6× “1 THE TRIAL COURT LACKED JURISDICTION TO RULE UPON EAP’S APPLICATION FOR CONFIRMATION OF AWARD IN ARBITRATION BECAUSE EAP FAILED TO SERVE COUNSEL FOR WNW AS REQUIRED BY O.R.C. 2711.05 AND CIV.R. 5 WITHIN THE ONE-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS PRESCRIBED BY 2711.”
Dom. Linen Supply Co., Inc. v. Exec. Court Med. Assocs., Inc., 2017 Ohio 1216 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “R.C. 2711.05 provides, “Any application to the court of common pleas under sections 2711.”
Show all 16 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.