Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.55 (2026)

Determination of claims for an award of reparations

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The attorney general or the court of claims shall determine all matters relating to claims for an award of reparations. The attorney general or the court of claims may order law enforcement officers to provide copies of any information or data gathered in the investigation of the criminally injurious conduct that is the basis of any claim to enable the attorney general or the court of claims to determine whether, and the extent to which, a claimant qualifies for an award of reparations.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1983–2010 · leading case: State ex rel. Ferguson v. Court of Claims, 786 N.E.2d 43 (Ohio 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Ferguson v. Court of Claims, 786 N.E.2d 43 (Ohio 2003). · cites it 2× “The attorney general, a court of claims panel of commissioners, or a judge of the court of claims may order law enforcement officers to provide copies of any information or data gathered in the investigation of the criminally injurious conduct that is the basis of any claim to…”
State ex rel. Cordray v. Court of Claims, 941 N.E.2d 93 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 3× “{¶ 70} R.C. 2743.55 provides: (A) The attorney general, a court of claims panel of commissioners, or a judge of the court of claims shall determine all matters relating to claims for an award of reparations.”
In re McKinnon, 476 N.E.2d 1101 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 1984). · cites it 4× “” On review the panel of three commissioners ruled that it had authority under R.C. 2743.55(A) to determine the constitutionality of the application of R.”
In re Grow, 454 N.E.2d 618 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 1983). · cites it 5× “” R.C. 2743.55 (A). (Emphasis added.) R.C. 2743.”
Montgomery v. John Doe 26, 750 N.E.2d 1149 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). “Here, the statute became operative when the victims of defendants’ crimes received reparations from the fund pursuant to R.C. 2743.55(C): on July 22, 1987 with respect to John Doe 32, on December 29, 1987 with respect to John Doe 54, and on March 10,1983 with respect to John Doe…”
State ex rel. Jenkins v. Tyack, 479 N.E.2d 267 (Ohio 1985). “The panel of three commissioners pursuant to R.C. 2743.55(C) conducted a hearing and made findings of facts and conclusions of law favorable to relator.”
In re McKnight, 644 N.E.2d 742 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 1993). “R.C. 2743.55(C) provides the following: “(C) Each claim for an award of reparations shall be heard by a single commissioner.”
In re Porter, 684 N.E.2d 107 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 1994). “R.C. 2743.55(A) provides, in pertinent part, that “a panel of court of claims commissioners shall hear and determine all matters relating to claims for an award of reparations.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.55(A): 5 cases
State ex rel. Ferguson v. Court of Claims, 786 N.E.2d 43 (Ohio 2003). “The attorney general, a court of claims panel of commissioners, or a judge of the court of claims may order law enforcement officers to provide copies of any information or data gathered in the investigation of the criminally injurious conduct that is the basis of any claim to…”
State ex rel. Cordray v. Court of Claims, 941 N.E.2d 93 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010). “{¶ 70} R.C. 2743.55 provides: (A) The attorney general, a court of claims panel of commissioners, or a judge of the court of claims shall determine all matters relating to claims for an award of reparations.”
In re McKinnon, 476 N.E.2d 1101 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 1984). “” On review the panel of three commissioners ruled that it had authority under R.C. 2743.55(A) to determine the constitutionality of the application of R.”
In re Grow, 454 N.E.2d 618 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 1983). “” R.C. 2743.55 (A). (Emphasis added.) R.C. 2743.”
In re Porter, 684 N.E.2d 107 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 1994). “R.C. 2743.55(A) provides, in pertinent part, that “a panel of court of claims commissioners shall hear and determine all matters relating to claims for an award of reparations.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.55(C): 4 cases
Montgomery v. John Doe 26, 750 N.E.2d 1149 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). “Here, the statute became operative when the victims of defendants’ crimes received reparations from the fund pursuant to R.C. 2743.55(C): on July 22, 1987 with respect to John Doe 32, on December 29, 1987 with respect to John Doe 54, and on March 10,1983 with respect to John Doe…”
State ex rel. Jenkins v. Tyack, 479 N.E.2d 267 (Ohio 1985). “The panel of three commissioners pursuant to R.C. 2743.55(C) conducted a hearing and made findings of facts and conclusions of law favorable to relator.”
In re Grow, 454 N.E.2d 618 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 1983). “” R.C. 2743.55 (A). (Emphasis added.) R.C. 2743.”
In re McKnight, 644 N.E.2d 742 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 1993). “R.C. 2743.55(C) provides the following: “(C) Each claim for an award of reparations shall be heard by a single commissioner.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.