Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2905.21 (2026)

Extortionate extension of credit - criminal usury definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in sections 2905.21 to 2905.24 of the Revised Code:

(A) "To extend credit" means to make or renew any loan, or to enter into any agreement, express or implied, for the repayment or satisfaction of any debt or claim, regardless of whether the extension of credit is acknowledged or disputed, valid or invalid, and however arising.

(B) "Creditor" means any person who extends credit, or any person claiming by, under, or through such a person.

(C) "Debtor" means any person who receives an extension of credit, any person who guarantees the repayment of an extension of credit, or any person who in any manner undertakes to indemnify the creditor against loss resulting from the failure of any recipient to repay an extension of credit.

(D) "Repayment" of an extension of credit means the repayment, satisfaction, or discharge in whole or in part of any debt or claim, acknowledged or disputed, valid or invalid, resulting from or in connection with that extension of credit.

(E) "Collect an extension of credit" means an attempt to collect from a debtor all or part of an amount due from the extension of credit.

(F) "Extortionate extension of credit" means any extension of credit with respect to which it is the understanding of the creditor and the debtor at the time it is made that delay in making repayment or failure to make repayment will result in the use of an extortionate means or if the debtor at a later time learns that failure to make repayment will result in the use of extortionate means.

(G) "Extortionate means" is any means that involves the use, or an express or implicit threat of use, of violence or other criminal means to cause harm to the person or property of the debtor or any member of his family.

(H) "Criminal usury" means illegally charging, taking, or receiving any money or other property as interest on an extension of credit at a rate exceeding twenty-five per cent per annum or the equivalent rate for a longer or shorter period, unless either:

(1) The rate of interest is otherwise authorized by law;

(2) The creditor and the debtor, or all the creditors and all the debtors are members of the same immediate family.

(I) "Immediate family" means a person's spouse residing in the person's household, brothers and sisters of the whole or of the half blood, and children, including adopted children.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1969–2025 · leading case: Atassi v. McLaren (In Re McLaren), 110 B.R. 290 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Atassi v. McLaren (In Re McLaren), 110 B.R. 290 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1990). · cites it 11× “On their face neither section 2905.21 nor 1343.01 necessarily applies to the $15,000 fee since it is not clear that the fee promised Dr.”
Argote-Romero v. LAZ Parking LTD., L.L.C., 2025 Ohio 400 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 6× “{¶ 40} The appellant alleges that even if she was a party to an implied contract to pay parking fines issued by the appellees, each issuance of a $30 parking citation represented an extension of credit as defined under R.C. 2905.21(A). (Appellant’s Brief at 39.”
Oak River Equity Ventures LLC v. Boss Lifestyle LLC (S.D. Ohio 2024). · cites it 4× “Code § 2905.21(H). And § 2905.21(H)’s civil counterpart, Ohio Rev.”
Oak River Equity Ventures LLC v. Boss Lifestyle LLC (S.D. Ohio 2024). · cites it 4× “Code § 2905.21(H). And § 2905.21(H)’s civil counterpart, Ohio Rev.”
State v. Kendall, 2011 Ohio 2475 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “” Further, R.C. 2905.21 is self limiting in its application, stating as follows: “As used in sections 2905.”
United States ex. rel. Sanders v. State, 322 F. Supp. 28 (S.D. Ohio 1969). · cites it 3× “Their uncontradicted testimony must be taken as true, although the subject of much of their testimony was what transpired at trial and certain of the ambiguities might have been cleared up by the introduction of a transcript of those proceedings.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2905.21(A): 1 case
Argote-Romero v. LAZ Parking LTD., L.L.C., 2025 Ohio 400 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “{¶ 40} The appellant alleges that even if she was a party to an implied contract to pay parking fines issued by the appellees, each issuance of a $30 parking citation represented an extension of credit as defined under R.C. 2905.21(A). (Appellant’s Brief at 39.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2905.21(H): 4 cases
Atassi v. McLaren (In Re McLaren), 110 B.R. 290 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1990). “On their face neither section 2905.21 nor 1343.01 necessarily applies to the $15,000 fee since it is not clear that the fee promised Dr.”
Argote-Romero v. LAZ Parking LTD., L.L.C., 2025 Ohio 400 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “{¶ 40} The appellant alleges that even if she was a party to an implied contract to pay parking fines issued by the appellees, each issuance of a $30 parking citation represented an extension of credit as defined under R.C. 2905.21(A). (Appellant’s Brief at 39.”
Oak River Equity Ventures LLC v. Boss Lifestyle LLC (S.D. Ohio 2024). “Code § 2905.21(H). And § 2905.21(H)’s civil counterpart, Ohio Rev.”
Oak River Equity Ventures LLC v. Boss Lifestyle LLC (S.D. Ohio 2024). “Code § 2905.21(H). And § 2905.21(H)’s civil counterpart, Ohio Rev.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2905.21(H)(1): 4 cases
Atassi v. McLaren (In Re McLaren), 110 B.R. 290 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1990). “On their face neither section 2905.21 nor 1343.01 necessarily applies to the $15,000 fee since it is not clear that the fee promised Dr.”
Argote-Romero v. LAZ Parking LTD., L.L.C., 2025 Ohio 400 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “{¶ 40} The appellant alleges that even if she was a party to an implied contract to pay parking fines issued by the appellees, each issuance of a $30 parking citation represented an extension of credit as defined under R.C. 2905.21(A). (Appellant’s Brief at 39.”
Oak River Equity Ventures LLC v. Boss Lifestyle LLC (S.D. Ohio 2024). “Code § 2905.21(H). And § 2905.21(H)’s civil counterpart, Ohio Rev.”
Oak River Equity Ventures LLC v. Boss Lifestyle LLC (S.D. Ohio 2024). “Code § 2905.21(H). And § 2905.21(H)’s civil counterpart, Ohio Rev.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2905.21(I): 1 case
State v. Kendall, 2011 Ohio 2475 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011). “” Further, R.C. 2905.21 is self limiting in its application, stating as follows: “As used in sections 2905.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.