(A) No person shall engage in sexual activity for hire.
(B) No person, with knowledge that the person has tested positive as a carrier of a virus that causes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, shall engage in sexual activity for hire.
(C)(1) Whoever violates division (A) of this section is guilty of prostitution, a misdemeanor of the third degree.
(2) Whoever violates division (B) of this section is guilty of engaging in prostitution after a positive HIV test. If the offender commits the violation prior to July 1, 1996, engaging in prostitution after a positive HIV test is a felony of the second degree. If the offender commits the violation on or after July 1, 1996, engaging in prostitution after a positive HIV test is a felony of the third degree.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1984–2024 · leading case: State v. Parrish, 465 N.E.2d 873 (Ohio 1984).
State v. Parrish, 465 N.E.2d 873 (Ohio 1984). · cites it 7ד) R.C. 2907.25 defines the crime of “prostitution” as follows: “(A) No person shall engage in sexual activity for hire.”
State v. Johnson, 2010-Ohio-6301, 128 Ohio St. 3d 107. · cites it 2ד2d 873 (R.C. 2907.25(A)); State v. O’Brien (1987), 30 Ohio St.”
State v. Lester, 2009-Ohio-4225, 916 N.E.2d 1038. · cites it 2ד2d 873 (because the statute does not expressly differentiate degrees of culpability, “the participants in the crime of prostitution addressed in R.C. 2907.25(A) must 16 January Term, 2009 possess some degree of criminal intent to be found guilty of either the principal offense…”
State v. Wallace, 2012-Ohio-6270. · cites it 4דThis is the same definition of “sexual contact” used in the prostitution statute, R.C. 2907.25. The federal district court in J.”
Seo v. Austintown Twp., 722 N.E.2d 1090 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 3דR.C. 2907.25 (prostitution) states: “(A) No person shall engage in sexual activity for hire.”
State v. Satterfield, 2017-Ohio-5616, 94 N.E.3d 171. “Initially, we note that Jennifer failed to argue in the proceedings before the trial court that she should have been charged with procuring prostitution rather than promoting prostitution. Jennifer argued in her post-trial memorandum that "the State proved at trial * * * that…”
State v. Andrews, 870 N.E.2d 775 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007). “” The Anderson court determined that the offense of soliciting was nothing more than *339 an attempt to engage in the offense of prostitution, defined by R.C. 2907.25 as engaging in sexual activity for hire.”
City of Cleveland v. Huff, 470 N.E.2d 934 (Ohio Ct. App. 1984). “(R.C. 2907.25.) Eight establishments were allegedly under police investigation.”
State v. Yu, 2024-Ohio-3083. “{¶3} In November 2018, in the cases numbered 18CRB-29828A and 18CRB- 29828B, Yu was charged with two counts of prostitution in violation of R.C. 2907.25, 1 We use Yu’s name rather than her initials in this opinion because neither party sought to identify Yu using a pseudonym…”
State v. Ziko, 595 N.E.2d 1019 (Ohio Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2ד” Parrish held that prostitution, R.C. 2907.25, is not a strict liability offense.”
State v. Jacob, 2015-Ohio-4760, 50 N.E.3d 279. “” Despite this, Jacob argues that he should have been charged with prostitution under R.C. 2907.25 instead of solicitation under R.”
Matthews v. Pernell, 582 N.E.2d 1075 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990). “R.C. 2907.25. Promoting prostitution, through operating a brothel or supervising or managing the activities of a prostitute, is also prohibited by law.”
State v. Johnson, 2010-Ohio-6301, 128 Ohio St. 3d 107. “2d 873 (R.C. 2907.25(A)); State v. O’Brien (1987), 30 Ohio St.”
State v. Lester, 2009-Ohio-4225, 916 N.E.2d 1038. “2d 873 (because the statute does not expressly differentiate degrees of culpability, “the participants in the crime of prostitution addressed in R.C. 2907.25(A) must 16 January Term, 2009 possess some degree of criminal intent to be found guilty of either the principal offense…”
State v. Wallace, 2012-Ohio-6270. “This is the same definition of “sexual contact” used in the prostitution statute, R.C. 2907.25. The federal district court in J.”
State v. Parrish, 465 N.E.2d 873 (Ohio 1984). “) R.C. 2907.25 defines the crime of “prostitution” as follows: “(A) No person shall engage in sexual activity for hire.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.