Notes of Decisions
Cited in
145
cases (
58 in the last 5 years), 1984–2026 · leading case:
State v. Robinson, 2009 Ohio 5937 (Ohio 2009).
State v. Robinson, 2009 Ohio 5937 (Ohio 2009).
· cites it 24× “Robinson was convicted of disrupting public services under R.C. 2909.04, which provides as follows: {¶ 20} “(A) No person, purposely by any means or knowingly by damaging or tampering with any property, shall do any of the following: {¶ 21} “ * * * *81 {¶ 22} “(3) Substantially…”
State v. Frost, 2019 Ohio 3540 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 12× “] For purposes of the disrupting public services statute, R.C. 2909.04(A), the term "impair" means "'to make worse' or 'diminish in quantity, value, excellence, or strength.”
State v. Hill, 2010 Ohio 4871 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 24× “Hill appeals the April 24, 2009 decision of the Monroe County Court of Common Pleas, imposing a sentence of three years of community control after accepting Hill's no contest plea to one count of attempted disruption of public services, in violation of R.C. 2909.04 and R.C.…”
State v. Jackson, 2019 Ohio 170 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 12× “{¶62} We conclude that the State presented sufficient evidence from which the jury could find Jackson guilty of disrupting public services.”
Anthony Novak v. City of Parma, 932 F.3d 421 (6th Cir. 2019).
· cites it 3× “The warrants said that Novak unlawfully impaired the department's functions, in violation of Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.04(B). Novak responds that, other than twelve minutes of phone calls to the *426 department, the police department suffered no disruption to its functions.”
State v. Robinson, 895 N.E.2d 262 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 14× “{¶ 23} Robinson argues that his conviction of disrupting public services was not supported by sufficient evidence because he did not cause serious physical harm to the victim and because he inflicted the injury to the victim prior to any call for emergency services.”
City of Shaker Heights v. Mosely, 865 N.E.2d 859 (Ohio 2007).
· cites it 4× “{¶ v} “(2) ‘Emergency facility person’ is the singular of ‘emergency facility personnel’ as defined in section 2909.04 of the Revised Code. {¶ w} “(3) ‘Emergency facility’ has the same meaning as in section 2909.”
State v. Herring, 2017 Ohio 743 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 5× “The victim testified that Herring did not have permission to take her car after the beating, so the children’s testimony that Herring sometimes was seen driving her car in the past is irrelevant to the events on April 29, 2015.”
State v. Brown, 646 N.E.2d 838 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994).
· cites it 8× “25 with two violence specifications and a “furthermore” clause based on a prior domestic violence conviction; and (3) disrupting public services in violation of R.C. 2909.04 with two violence specifications.”
State v. Fry, 2010 Ohio 1017 (Ohio 2010).
· cites it 2× “Accordingly, I would reverse the R.C. 2909.04(A)(7) death specification. 57 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO {¶ 240} Furthermore, “[t]o pass constitutional muster, a capital sentencing scheme must ‘genuinely narrow the class of persons eligible for the death penalty and must reasonably…”
Anthony Novak v. City of Parma, Ohio, 33 F.4th 296 (6th Cir. 2022).
· cites it 2× “Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.04(B). Both judges found there was probable cause and issued the warrants.”
State v. Myers, 2022 Ohio 991 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
· cites it 5× “13(A)(3) and disrupting public services in violation of R.C. 2909.04(A)(1). A jury found Mr. Myers not guilty of kidnapping and abduction with respect to two of the victims named in the indictment but guilty with respect to the third victim, J.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.04(A) — 11 cases
State v. Robinson, 2009 Ohio 5937 (Ohio 2009).
“Robinson was convicted of disrupting public services under R.C. 2909.04, which provides as follows: {¶ 20} “(A) No person, purposely by any means or knowingly by damaging or tampering with any property, shall do any of the following: {¶ 21} “ * * * *81 {¶ 22} “(3) Substantially…”
State v. Jackson, 2019 Ohio 170 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“{¶62} We conclude that the State presented sufficient evidence from which the jury could find Jackson guilty of disrupting public services.”
State v. Frost, 2019 Ohio 3540 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“] For purposes of the disrupting public services statute, R.C. 2909.04(A), the term "impair" means "'to make worse' or 'diminish in quantity, value, excellence, or strength.”
State v. Hill, 2010 Ohio 4871 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
“Hill appeals the April 24, 2009 decision of the Monroe County Court of Common Pleas, imposing a sentence of three years of community control after accepting Hill's no contest plea to one count of attempted disruption of public services, in violation of R.C. 2909.04 and R.C.…”
State v. Robinson, 895 N.E.2d 262 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008).
“{¶ 23} Robinson argues that his conviction of disrupting public services was not supported by sufficient evidence because he did not cause serious physical harm to the victim and because he inflicted the injury to the victim prior to any call for emergency services.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.04(A)(1) — 70 cases
State v. Frost, 2019 Ohio 3540 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“] For purposes of the disrupting public services statute, R.C. 2909.04(A), the term "impair" means "'to make worse' or 'diminish in quantity, value, excellence, or strength.”
State v. Herring, 2017 Ohio 743 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
“The victim testified that Herring did not have permission to take her car after the beating, so the children’s testimony that Herring sometimes was seen driving her car in the past is irrelevant to the events on April 29, 2015.”
State v. Myers, 2022 Ohio 991 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
“13(A)(3) and disrupting public services in violation of R.C. 2909.04(A)(1). A jury found Mr. Myers not guilty of kidnapping and abduction with respect to two of the victims named in the indictment but guilty with respect to the third victim, J.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.04(A)(1)(C) — 5 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.04(A)(2) — 6 cases
State v. Brown, 646 N.E.2d 838 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994).
“25 with two violence specifications and a “furthermore” clause based on a prior domestic violence conviction; and (3) disrupting public services in violation of R.C. 2909.04 with two violence specifications.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.04(A)(3) — 49 cases
State v. Robinson, 2009 Ohio 5937 (Ohio 2009).
“Robinson was convicted of disrupting public services under R.C. 2909.04, which provides as follows: {¶ 20} “(A) No person, purposely by any means or knowingly by damaging or tampering with any property, shall do any of the following: {¶ 21} “ * * * *81 {¶ 22} “(3) Substantially…”
State v. Jackson, 2019 Ohio 170 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“{¶62} We conclude that the State presented sufficient evidence from which the jury could find Jackson guilty of disrupting public services.”
State v. Hill, 2010 Ohio 4871 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
“Hill appeals the April 24, 2009 decision of the Monroe County Court of Common Pleas, imposing a sentence of three years of community control after accepting Hill's no contest plea to one count of attempted disruption of public services, in violation of R.C. 2909.04 and R.C.…”
State v. Robinson, 895 N.E.2d 262 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008).
“{¶ 23} Robinson argues that his conviction of disrupting public services was not supported by sufficient evidence because he did not cause serious physical harm to the victim and because he inflicted the injury to the victim prior to any call for emergency services.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.04(A)(3)(C) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.04(A)(4) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.04(A)(7) — 1 case
State v. Fry, 2010 Ohio 1017 (Ohio 2010).
“Accordingly, I would reverse the R.C. 2909.04(A)(7) death specification. 57 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO {¶ 240} Furthermore, “[t]o pass constitutional muster, a capital sentencing scheme must ‘genuinely narrow the class of persons eligible for the death penalty and must reasonably…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.04(A)(C) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.04(B) — 7 cases
Anthony Novak v. City of Parma, 932 F.3d 421 (6th Cir. 2019).
“The warrants said that Novak unlawfully impaired the department's functions, in violation of Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.04(B). Novak responds that, other than twelve minutes of phone calls to the *426 department, the police department suffered no disruption to its functions.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.04(C) — 3 cases
State v. Frost, 2019 Ohio 3540 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“] For purposes of the disrupting public services statute, R.C. 2909.04(A), the term "impair" means "'to make worse' or 'diminish in quantity, value, excellence, or strength.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.