Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.22 (2026)

Soliciting or providing support for act of terrorism

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Effective:

May 15, 2002

Latest Legislation:

Senate Bill 184 - 124th General Assembly

PDF:

Download Authenticated PDF

(A) No person shall raise, solicit, collect, donate, or provide any material support or resources, with purpose that the material support or resources will be used in whole or in part to plan, prepare, carry out, or aid in either an act of terrorism or the concealment of, or an escape from, an act of terrorism.

(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of soliciting or providing support for an act of terrorism, a felony of the third degree. Section 2909.25 of the Revised Code applies regarding an offender who is convicted of or pleads guilty to a violation of this section.

(C) A prosecution for a violation of this section does not preclude a prosecution for a violation of any other section of the Revised Code. One or more acts, a series of acts, or a course of behavior that can be prosecuted under this section or any other section of the Revised Code may be prosecuted under this section, the other section, or both sections.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2014–2024 · leading case: State v. Parks, 2024 Ohio 5026 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Parks, 2024 Ohio 5026 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “There was no question that the vehicle was operable, even though it was missing a battery, because Ernest had driven it to the junkyard only a few days before it was found.”

State v. Spurgeon, 2014 Ohio 4849 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “27(A)(1), both misdemeanors of the first degree; one count of criminal damaging in violation of R.C. 2909.22(A), a misdemeanor of the second degree; and one count of endangering children in violation of R.”

State v. McKenzie, 2017 Ohio 7366 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “, the facts and circumstances surrounding the defendant’s wrongful act, when determining if the Highland App. No. 16CA23 9 defendant was subjectively ‘aware that his conduct will probably cause a certain result or will probably be of a certain nature.”

Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.22(A): 1 case

State v. Spurgeon, 2014 Ohio 4849 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “27(A)(1), both misdemeanors of the first degree; one count of criminal damaging in violation of R.C. 2909.22(A), a misdemeanor of the second degree; and one count of endangering children in violation of R.”

Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.22(B): 1 case

State v. McKenzie, 2017 Ohio 7366 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “, the facts and circumstances surrounding the defendant’s wrongful act, when determining if the Highland App. No. 16CA23 9 defendant was subjectively ‘aware that his conduct will probably cause a certain result or will probably be of a certain nature.”

Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.22(B)(2): 1 case

State v. Parks, 2024 Ohio 5026 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “There was no question that the vehicle was operable, even though it was missing a battery, because Ernest had driven it to the junkyard only a few days before it was found.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.