Notes of Decisions
State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion), 2014 Ohio 3177 (Ohio 2014).
· cites it 2× “2”), the General Assembly limited judicial discretion in imposing consecutive sentences and established a presumption in favor of concurrent sentences in former R.C. 2929.41(A), 146 Ohio Laws, Part IV, at 7502, which the trial court could overcome only by making the statutorily…”
State v. Hughes, 2021 Ohio 3127 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
· cites it 2× “CONSECUTIVE PRISON TERMS {¶26} For her second assignment of error, Hughes concedes that the trial court stated the necessary statutory language on the record and in the sentencing entry – the trial court made the findings required by R.C. 2919.14(C)(4) – thus consecutive…”
State v. Peabody, 2024 Ohio 185 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
· cites it 2× “In his fifth assignment of error, Peabody argues that the trial court imposed consecutive sentences without making sufficient findings required under R.C. 2919.14(C)(4). In particular, he maintains that at the sentencing hearing, the trial court failed to find that consecutive…”
State v. Fields, 2017 Ohio 661 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
“), the court provided the following perspective regarding the findings required by former R.C. 2919.14(E)(4): In some sense, the findings required by R.”
State v. Lane, 2022 Ohio 3775 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
“11(A), (C)(6)(b); R.C. 2919.14(A)(4). As a first degree felony, possession of heroin in violation of R.”
State v. Gray, 2019 Ohio 5317 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“25 or consecutive sentences under R.C. 2919.14. Her decision not to object on those grounds was reasonable and Appellant has not shown that Scioto App.”
Barney v. Conway, 730 F. Supp. 2d 264 (W.D.N.Y. 2010).
· cites it 2× “See Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 2919.14(B) (2003) (where a defendant has not served a prior prison term, the “court shall impose the shortest prison term authorized for the offense .”
State v. Steiner, 2016 Ohio 4648 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
“At least one of the findings in R.C. 2919.14(C)(4) must also be made and supported by the record.”
State v. Graham, 2014 Ohio 3149 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
“See R.C. 2919.14(A)(1) (“For a felony of the first degree, the prison term shall be three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, or eleven years”).”
State v. Willan, 2011 Ohio 6603 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
“R.C. 2919.14(A)(1). The State persuaded the trial court, however, that it was further required by R.”
State v. Ashcraft, 2021 Ohio 3842 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
“Sentencing Guidelines General Sentencing Statute {¶15} R.C. 2919.14(A)(3) is a general sentencing statute that controls third- degree felonies.”
Forbes v. Napolitano, 236 F.3d 1009 (9th Cir. 2000).
“2-01-02 (1985); Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 2919.14 (Baldwin 1986); Okla.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.14(A) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.14(A)(1) — 2 cases
State v. Graham, 2014 Ohio 3149 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
“See R.C. 2919.14(A)(1) (“For a felony of the first degree, the prison term shall be three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, or eleven years”).”
State v. Willan, 2011 Ohio 6603 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
“R.C. 2919.14(A)(1). The State persuaded the trial court, however, that it was further required by R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.14(A)(3) — 2 cases
State v. Ashcraft, 2021 Ohio 3842 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
“Sentencing Guidelines General Sentencing Statute {¶15} R.C. 2919.14(A)(3) is a general sentencing statute that controls third- degree felonies.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.14(A)(4) — 3 cases
State v. Lane, 2022 Ohio 3775 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
“11(A), (C)(6)(b); R.C. 2919.14(A)(4). As a first degree felony, possession of heroin in violation of R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.14(B) — 1 case
Barney v. Conway, 730 F. Supp. 2d 264 (W.D.N.Y. 2010).
“See Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 2919.14(B) (2003) (where a defendant has not served a prior prison term, the “court shall impose the shortest prison term authorized for the offense .”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.14(B)(1)(a) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.14(B)(1)(g) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.14(B)(2003) — 1 case
Barney v. Conway, 730 F. Supp. 2d 264 (W.D.N.Y. 2010).
“See Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 2919.14(B) (2003) (where a defendant has not served a prior prison term, the “court shall impose the shortest prison term authorized for the offense .”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.14(C) — 2 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.14(C)(4) — 10 cases
State v. Hughes, 2021 Ohio 3127 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
“CONSECUTIVE PRISON TERMS {¶26} For her second assignment of error, Hughes concedes that the trial court stated the necessary statutory language on the record and in the sentencing entry – the trial court made the findings required by R.C. 2919.14(C)(4) – thus consecutive…”
State v. Peabody, 2024 Ohio 185 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
“In his fifth assignment of error, Peabody argues that the trial court imposed consecutive sentences without making sufficient findings required under R.C. 2919.14(C)(4). In particular, he maintains that at the sentencing hearing, the trial court failed to find that consecutive…”
State v. Steiner, 2016 Ohio 4648 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
“At least one of the findings in R.C. 2919.14(C)(4) must also be made and supported by the record.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.14(C)(4)(a) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.14(C)(4)(c) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.14(E)(3) — 1 case
State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion), 2014 Ohio 3177 (Ohio 2014).
“2”), the General Assembly limited judicial discretion in imposing consecutive sentences and established a presumption in favor of concurrent sentences in former R.C. 2929.41(A), 146 Ohio Laws, Part IV, at 7502, which the trial court could overcome only by making the statutorily…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.14(E)(4) — 1 case
State v. Fields, 2017 Ohio 661 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
“), the court provided the following perspective regarding the findings required by former R.C. 2919.14(E)(4): In some sense, the findings required by R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.