Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.191 (2026)

Applicability

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 2919.192 to 2919.195 of the Revised Code apply only to intrauterine pregnancies.

Last updated July 30, 2025 at 3:08 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2007–2026 · leading case: Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Kasich (Slip Opinion), 2018-Ohio-441, 102 N.E.3d 461.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Kasich (Slip Opinion), 2018-Ohio-441, 102 N.E.3d 461. · cites it 11× “191(E), and it imposes duties only on persons who determine the presence or absence of a fetal heartbeat and who intend to and do perform or induce abortions, R.”
Preterm-Cleveland v. Yost, 2022-Ohio-4540. “After the detection of cardiac activity, providers may perform abortions that they determine are necessary 3 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS (1) to preserve the pregnant woman’s life, or (2) to prevent a “serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a…”
Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Kasich, 2016-Ohio-4859. “See R.C. 2919.191; 2919.192; 2317.56. With certain exceptions, no person shall perform an abortion before determining whether there is a detectable heartbeat.”
State v. Chasteen, 2013-Ohio-3573. “R.C. 2919.191(B)(1). This corrective procedure is to occur "at any time before the offender is released from imprisonment under that term.”
State v. Kozic, 2016-Ohio-8556. “To correct the lack of statutorily-required notice of post-release control items at the sentencing hearing, the court is to conduct a limited post- release control hearing under R.C. 2919.191(C) and correct the notification issues.”
Preterm-Cleveland v. Yost, 2026-Ohio-23, 278 N.E.3d 471. · cites it 2× “23 enacted or amended various auxiliary provisions, including a series of provisos, R.C. 2919.191, 2919.197, and 2929.198; several statutory definitions, R.”
State v. Zeisig, 2007 Ohio 505 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 2007). “Cruzado at 28; R.C. 2919.191. Appellant's sole assignment of error lacks merit.”
State v. Mikolaj, 2014-Ohio-4007. “{¶13} To correct the lack of statutorily-required notice of post-release control items at the sentencing hearing, the court is to conduct a limited post-release control hearing under R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.191(A): 1 case
Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Kasich (Slip Opinion), 2018-Ohio-441, 102 N.E.3d 461. “191(E), and it imposes duties only on persons who determine the presence or absence of a fetal heartbeat and who intend to and do perform or induce abortions, R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.191(B)(1): 2 cases
Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Kasich (Slip Opinion), 2018-Ohio-441, 102 N.E.3d 461. “191(E), and it imposes duties only on persons who determine the presence or absence of a fetal heartbeat and who intend to and do perform or induce abortions, R.”
State v. Chasteen, 2013-Ohio-3573. “R.C. 2919.191(B)(1). This corrective procedure is to occur "at any time before the offender is released from imprisonment under that term.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.191(B)(2): 1 case
Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Kasich (Slip Opinion), 2018-Ohio-441, 102 N.E.3d 461. “191(E), and it imposes duties only on persons who determine the presence or absence of a fetal heartbeat and who intend to and do perform or induce abortions, R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.191(C): 2 cases
State v. Kozic, 2016-Ohio-8556. “To correct the lack of statutorily-required notice of post-release control items at the sentencing hearing, the court is to conduct a limited post- release control hearing under R.C. 2919.191(C) and correct the notification issues.”
State v. Mikolaj, 2014-Ohio-4007. “{¶13} To correct the lack of statutorily-required notice of post-release control items at the sentencing hearing, the court is to conduct a limited post-release control hearing under R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.191(E): 1 case
Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Kasich (Slip Opinion), 2018-Ohio-441, 102 N.E.3d 461. “191(E), and it imposes duties only on persons who determine the presence or absence of a fetal heartbeat and who intend to and do perform or induce abortions, R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.