Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31 (2026)

Corrupt activity definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in sections 2923.31 to 2923.36 of the Revised Code:

(A) "Beneficial interest" means any of the following:

(1) The interest of a person as a beneficiary under a trust in which the trustee holds title to personal or real property;

(2) The interest of a person as a beneficiary under any other trust arrangement under which any other person holds title to personal or real property for the benefit of such person;

(3) The interest of a person under any other form of express fiduciary arrangement under which any other person holds title to personal or real property for the benefit of such person.

"Beneficial interest" does not include the interest of a stockholder in a corporation or the interest of a partner in either a general or limited partnership.

(B) "Costs of investigation and prosecution" and "costs of investigation and litigation" mean all of the costs incurred by the state or a county or municipal corporation under sections 2923.31 to 2923.36 of the Revised Code in the prosecution and investigation of any criminal action or in the litigation and investigation of any civil action, and includes, but is not limited to, the costs of resources and personnel.

(C) "Enterprise" includes any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust, union, government agency, or other legal entity, or any organization, association, or group of persons associated in fact although not a legal entity. "Enterprise" includes illicit as well as licit enterprises.

(D) "Innocent person" includes any bona fide purchaser of property that is allegedly involved in a violation of section 2923.32 of the Revised Code, including any person who establishes a valid claim to or interest in the property in accordance with division (E) of section 2981.04 of the Revised Code, and any victim of an alleged violation of that section or of any underlying offense involved in an alleged violation of that section.

(E) "Pattern of corrupt activity" means two or more incidents of corrupt activity, whether or not there has been a prior conviction, that are related to the affairs of the same enterprise, are not isolated, and are not so closely related to each other and connected in time and place that they constitute a single event.

At least one of the incidents forming the pattern shall occur on or after January 1, 1986. Unless any incident was an aggravated murder or murder, the last of the incidents forming the pattern shall occur within six years after the commission of any prior incident forming the pattern, excluding any period of imprisonment served by any person engaging in the corrupt activity.

For the purposes of the criminal penalties that may be imposed pursuant to section 2923.32 of the Revised Code, at least one of the incidents forming the pattern shall constitute a felony under the laws of this state in existence at the time it was committed or, if committed in violation of the laws of the United States or of any other state, shall constitute a felony under the law of the United States or the other state and would be a criminal offense under the law of this state if committed in this state.

(F) "Pecuniary value" means money, a negotiable instrument, a commercial interest, or anything of value, as defined in section 1.03 of the Revised Code, or any other property or service that has a value in excess of one hundred dollars.

(G) "Person" means any person, as defined in section 1.59 of the Revised Code, and any governmental officer, employee, or entity.

(H) "Personal property" means any personal property, any interest in personal property, or any right, including, but not limited to, bank accounts, debts, corporate stocks, patents, or copyrights. Personal property and any beneficial interest in personal property are deemed to be located where the trustee of the property, the personal property, or the instrument evidencing the right is located.

(I) "Corrupt activity" means engaging in, attempting to engage in, conspiring to engage in, or soliciting, coercing, or intimidating another person to engage in any of the following:

(1) Conduct defined as "racketeering activity" under the "Organized Crime Control Act of 1970," 84 Stat. 941, 18 U.S.C. 1961(1)(B), (1)(C), (1)(D), and (1)(E), as amended;

(2) Conduct constituting any of the following:

(a) A violation of section 1315.55, 1322.07, 2903.01, 2903.02, 2903.03, 2903.04, 2903.11, 2903.12, 2905.01, 2905.02, 2905.11, 2905.22, 2905.32 as specified in division (I)(2)(g) of this section, 2907.321, 2907.322, 2907.323, 2909.02, 2909.03, 2909.22, 2909.23, 2909.24, 2909.26, 2909.27, 2909.28, 2909.29, 2911.01, 2911.02, 2911.11, 2911.12, 2911.13, 2911.31, 2913.05, 2913.06, 2913.30, 2921.02, 2921.03, 2921.04, 2921.11, 2921.12, 2921.32, 2921.41, 2921.42, 2921.43, 2923.12, or 2923.17; division (F)(1)(a), (b), or (c) of section 1315.53; division (A)(1) or (2) of section 1707.042; division (B), (C)(4), (D), (E), or (F) of section 1707.44; division (A)(1) or (2) of section 2923.20; division (E) or (G) of section 3772.99; division (J)(1) of section 4712.02; section 4719.02, 4719.05, or 4719.06; division (C), (D), or (E) of section 4719.07; section 4719.08; or division (A) of section 4719.09 of the Revised Code.

(b) Any violation of section 3769.11, 3769.15, 3769.16, or 3769.19 of the Revised Code as it existed prior to July 1, 1996, any violation of section 2915.02 of the Revised Code that occurs on or after July 1, 1996, and that, had it occurred prior to that date, would have been a violation of section 3769.11 of the Revised Code as it existed prior to that date, or any violation of section 2915.05 of the Revised Code that occurs on or after July 1, 1996, and that, had it occurred prior to that date, would have been a violation of section 3769.15, 3769.16, or 3769.19 of the Revised Code as it existed prior to that date.

(c) Any violation of section 2907.21, 2907.22, 2907.31, 2913.02, 2913.11, 2913.21, 2913.31, 2913.32, 2913.34, 2913.42, 2913.47, 2913.51, 2915.03, 2925.03, 2925.04, 2925.05, or 2925.37 of the Revised Code, any violation of section 2925.11 of the Revised Code that is a felony of the first, second, third, or fourth degree and that occurs on or after July 1, 1996, any violation of section 2915.02 of the Revised Code that occurred prior to July 1, 1996, any violation of section 2915.02 of the Revised Code that occurs on or after July 1, 1996, and that, had it occurred prior to that date, would not have been a violation of section 3769.11 of the Revised Code as it existed prior to that date, any violation of section 2915.06 of the Revised Code as it existed prior to July 1, 1996, or any violation of division (B) of section 2915.05 of the Revised Code as it exists on and after July 1, 1996, when the proceeds of the violation, the payments made in the violation, the amount of a claim for payment or for any other benefit that is false or deceptive and that is involved in the violation, or the value of the contraband or other property illegally possessed, sold, or purchased in the violation exceeds one thousand dollars, or any combination of violations described in division (I)(2)(c) of this section when the total proceeds of the combination of violations, payments made in the combination of violations, amount of the claims for payment or for other benefits that is false or deceptive and that is involved in the combination of violations, or value of the contraband or other property illegally possessed, sold, or purchased in the combination of violations exceeds one thousand dollars;

(d) Any violation of section 5743.112 of the Revised Code when the amount of unpaid tax exceeds one hundred dollars;

(e) Any violation or combination of violations of section 2907.32 of the Revised Code involving any material or performance containing a display of bestiality or of sexual conduct, as defined in section 2907.01 of the Revised Code, that is explicit and depicted with clearly visible penetration of the genitals or clearly visible penetration by the penis of any orifice when the total proceeds of the violation or combination of violations, the payments made in the violation or combination of violations, or the value of the contraband or other property illegally possessed, sold, or purchased in the violation or combination of violations exceeds one thousand dollars;

(f) Any combination of violations described in division (I)(2)(c) of this section and violations of section 2907.32 of the Revised Code involving any material or performance containing a display of bestiality or of sexual conduct, as defined in section 2907.01 of the Revised Code, that is explicit and depicted with clearly visible penetration of the genitals or clearly visible penetration by the penis of any orifice when the total proceeds of the combination of violations, payments made in the combination of violations, amount of the claims for payment or for other benefits that is false or deceptive and that is involved in the combination of violations, or value of the contraband or other property illegally possessed, sold, or purchased in the combination of violations exceeds one thousand dollars;

(g) Any violation of section 2905.32 of the Revised Code to the extent the violation is not based solely on the same conduct that constitutes corrupt activity pursuant to division (I)(2)(c) of this section due to the conduct being in violation of section 2907.21 of the Revised Code.

(3) Conduct constituting a violation of any law of any state other than this state that is substantially similar to the conduct described in division (I)(2) of this section, provided the defendant was convicted of the conduct in a criminal proceeding in the other state;

(4) Animal or ecological terrorism;

(5)(a) Conduct constituting any of the following:

(i) Organized retail theft;

(ii) Conduct that constitutes one or more violations of any law of any state other than this state, that is substantially similar to organized retail theft, and that if committed in this state would be organized retail theft, if the defendant was convicted of or pleaded guilty to the conduct in a criminal proceeding in the other state.

(b) By enacting division (I)(5)(a) of this section, it is the intent of the general assembly to add organized retail theft and the conduct described in division (I)(5)(a)(ii) of this section as conduct constituting corrupt activity. The enactment of division (I)(5)(a) of this section and the addition by division (I)(5)(a) of this section of organized retail theft and the conduct described in division (I)(5)(a)(ii) of this section as conduct constituting corrupt activity does not limit or preclude, and shall not be construed as limiting or precluding, any prosecution for a violation of section 2923.32 of the Revised Code that is based on one or more violations of section 2913.02 or 2913.51 of the Revised Code, one or more similar offenses under the laws of this state or any other state, or any combination of any of those violations or similar offenses, even though the conduct constituting the basis for those violations or offenses could be construed as also constituting organized retail theft or conduct of the type described in division (I)(5)(a)(ii) of this section.

(J) "Real property" means any real property or any interest in real property, including, but not limited to, any lease of, or mortgage upon, real property. Real property and any beneficial interest in it is deemed to be located where the real property is located.

(K) "Trustee" means any of the following:

(1) Any person acting as trustee under a trust in which the trustee holds title to personal or real property;

(2) Any person who holds title to personal or real property for which any other person has a beneficial interest;

(3) Any successor trustee.

"Trustee" does not include an assignee or trustee for an insolvent debtor or an executor, administrator, administrator with the will annexed, testamentary trustee, guardian, or committee, appointed by, under the control of, or accountable to a court.

(L) "Unlawful debt" means any money or other thing of value constituting principal or interest of a debt that is legally unenforceable in this state in whole or in part because the debt was incurred or contracted in violation of any federal or state law relating to the business of gambling activity or relating to the business of lending money at an usurious rate unless the creditor proves, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the usurious rate was not intentionally set and that it resulted from a good faith error by the creditor, notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures that were adopted by the creditor to avoid an error of that nature.

(M) "Animal activity" means any activity that involves the use of animals or animal parts, including, but not limited to, hunting, fishing, trapping, traveling, camping, the production, preparation, or processing of food or food products, clothing or garment manufacturing, medical research, other research, entertainment, recreation, agriculture, biotechnology, or service activity that involves the use of animals or animal parts.

(N) "Animal facility" means a vehicle, building, structure, nature preserve, or other premises in which an animal is lawfully kept, handled, housed, exhibited, bred, or offered for sale, including, but not limited to, a zoo, rodeo, circus, amusement park, hunting preserve, or premises in which a horse or dog event is held.

(O) "Animal or ecological terrorism" means the commission of any felony that involves causing or creating a substantial risk of physical harm to any property of another, the use of a deadly weapon or dangerous ordnance, or purposely, knowingly, or recklessly causing serious physical harm to property and that involves an intent to obstruct, impede, or deter any person from participating in a lawful animal activity, from mining, foresting, harvesting, gathering, or processing natural resources, or from being lawfully present in or on an animal facility or research facility.

(P) "Research facility" means a place, laboratory, institution, medical care facility, government facility, or public or private educational institution in which a scientific test, experiment, or investigation involving the use of animals or other living organisms is lawfully carried out, conducted, or attempted.

(Q) "Organized retail theft" means the theft of retail property with a retail value of one thousand dollars or more from one or more retail establishments with the intent to sell, deliver, or transfer that property to a retail property fence.

(R) "Retail property" means any tangible personal property displayed, held, stored, or offered for sale in or by a retail establishment.

(S) "Retail property fence" means a person who possesses, procures, receives, or conceals retail property that was represented to the person as being stolen or that the person knows or believes to be stolen.

(T) "Retail value" means the full retail value of the retail property. In determining whether the retail value of retail property equals or exceeds one thousand dollars, the value of all retail property stolen from the retail establishment or retail establishments by the same person or persons within any one-hundred-eighty-day period shall be aggregated.

The Legislative Service Commission presents the text of this section as a composite of the section as amended by multiple acts of the General Assembly. This presentation recognizes the principle stated in R.C. 1.52(B) that amendments are to be harmonized if reasonably capable of simultaneous operation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 234 cases (62 in the last 5 years), 1986–2026 · leading case: State v. Stevens, 2014 Ohio 1932 (Ohio 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Stevens, 2014 Ohio 1932 (Ohio 2014). · cites it 109× “{¶ 59} Ohio, like many states, enacted its own version of RICO through the adoption of R.C. 2923.31 et seq. R.C. 2923.31 and 2923.”
State v. Dent (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 6670 (Ohio 2020). · cites it 22× “But federal congressional intent aside, an application of the plain language of Ohio’s statutes—R.C. 2923.31 and 2923.32—demonstrates that the state did not put forth sufficient evidence that Walker and Dent engaged in a pattern of corrupt activity.”
State v. Beverly (Slip Opinion), 2015 Ohio 219 (Ohio 2015). · cites it 10× “32(A)(1), can be established without proving that the enterprise is a structure separate and distinct from a pattern of corrupt activity. {¶ 14} We emphasize that we reach our conclusion after analyzing the statutory scheme and applying it to the question before us.”
State v. Adkins, 737 N.E.2d 1021 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 23× “The elements of that offense are further defined in R.C. 2923.31. Relevant definitions, in effect at the time of the offense alleged here, are as follows: “(C) ‘Enterprise’ includes any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust, union,…”
State v. Miranda, 2014 Ohio 451 (Ohio 2014). · cites it 8× ““Corrupt activity” is defined as any of the criminal offenses listed in R.C. 2923.31(1). And finally, a “pattern of corrupt *188 activity” means “two or more incidents of corrupt activity * * * that are related to the affairs of the same enterprise, are not isolated, and are not…”
Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati, 849 N.E.2d 268 (Ohio 2006). · cites it 5× “{¶ 5} On March 3, 2004, Doe filed a complaint against Hopp, the archbishop, and the archdiocese in the Shelby County Court of Common Pleas, alleging breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, liability of the archbishop and the archdiocese through respondeat superior, intentional…”
State v. Siferd, 783 N.E.2d 591 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 8× “32(A)(1) provides: “No person employed by, or associated with, any enterprise shall conduct or participate in, directly or indirectly, the affairs of the enterprise through a pattern of corrupt activity * * The elements of the offense are further defined in R.C. 2923.31, which…”
State v. Ross, 2012 Ohio 536 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 13× “Instead, both counts alleged that Ross engaged in a pattern of corrupt activity that involved offenses “enumerated in this indictment that constitute corrupt activity as defined in Section 2923.31 of the Revised Code[.]” His indictment included charges of bribery and having an…”
Foster v. D.B.S. Collection Agency, 463 F. Supp. 2d 783 (S.D. Ohio 2006). · cites it 8× “Plaintiffs have alleged a claim against the Defendants for violation of the OPCA, Ohio Rev.Code § 2923.31, et seq., which is patterned after the Federal Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.”
Matthews v. New Century Mortg. Corp., 185 F. Supp. 2d 874 (S.D. Ohio 2002). · cites it 11× “Therefore, the Court DENIES the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs’ common law fraud claim.”
State v. Malone, 2016 Ohio 5556 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 17× “Discussion {¶21} The trial court essentially made two substantive legal rulings regarding the term “enterprise” as it is used in R.C. 2923.31 et seq.: (1) The trial court concluded as a matter of law that a business which has had its articles of incorporation revoked by the Ohio…”
State v. Griffin (Slip Opinion), 2014 Ohio 4767 (Ohio 2014). · cites it 6× “{¶ 7} The entire jury charge in this case comprises over 46 pages of transcript.”
Show all 234 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(1) — 25 cases
State v. Miranda, 2014 Ohio 451 (Ohio 2014). ““Corrupt activity” is defined as any of the criminal offenses listed in R.C. 2923.31(1). And finally, a “pattern of corrupt *188 activity” means “two or more incidents of corrupt activity * * * that are related to the affairs of the same enterprise, are not isolated, and are not…”
Bradley v. Miller, 96 F. Supp. 3d 753 (S.D. Ohio 2015).
Universal Coach, Inc. v. New York City Transit Auth., Inc., 629 N.E.2d 28 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993).
State v. Stevens, 2014 Ohio 1932 (Ohio 2014). “{¶ 59} Ohio, like many states, enacted its own version of RICO through the adoption of R.C. 2923.31 et seq. R.C. 2923.31 and 2923.”
Morrow v. Reminger & Reminger Co., 915 N.E.2d 696 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(1)(2)(c) — 1 case
State v. Stevens, 2014 Ohio 1932 (Ohio 2014). “{¶ 59} Ohio, like many states, enacted its own version of RICO through the adoption of R.C. 2923.31 et seq. R.C. 2923.31 and 2923.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(A) — 3 cases
State v. Terry, 2025 Ohio 1195 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
State v. Rice, 659 N.E.2d 826 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995).
State v. Simmons, 2026 Ohio 360 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(A)(1) — 5 cases
State v. Infante, 2020 Ohio 992 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
State v. Phelps, 2022 Ohio 3025 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Washington, 2023 Ohio 4484 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
Infante v. Black (N.D. Ohio 2024).
State v. Glenn, 2025 Ohio 3121 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(A)(1)(B)(1) — 1 case
State v. Hayward, 2017 Ohio 8611 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(A)(2) — 1 case
Chapman v. Eppinger (N.D. Ohio 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(B) — 1 case
State v. Donaldson, 2020 Ohio 3591 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(C) — 102 cases
State v. Dent (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 6670 (Ohio 2020). “But federal congressional intent aside, an application of the plain language of Ohio’s statutes—R.C. 2923.31 and 2923.32—demonstrates that the state did not put forth sufficient evidence that Walker and Dent engaged in a pattern of corrupt activity.”
State v. Griffin (Slip Opinion), 2014 Ohio 4767 (Ohio 2014). “{¶ 7} The entire jury charge in this case comprises over 46 pages of transcript.”
State v. Beverly (Slip Opinion), 2015 Ohio 219 (Ohio 2015). “32(A)(1), can be established without proving that the enterprise is a structure separate and distinct from a pattern of corrupt activity. {¶ 14} We emphasize that we reach our conclusion after analyzing the statutory scheme and applying it to the question before us.”
State v. Malone, 2016 Ohio 5556 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “Discussion {¶21} The trial court essentially made two substantive legal rulings regarding the term “enterprise” as it is used in R.C. 2923.31 et seq.: (1) The trial court concluded as a matter of law that a business which has had its articles of incorporation revoked by the Ohio…”
State v. Miranda, 2014 Ohio 451 (Ohio 2014). ““Corrupt activity” is defined as any of the criminal offenses listed in R.C. 2923.31(1). And finally, a “pattern of corrupt *188 activity” means “two or more incidents of corrupt activity * * * that are related to the affairs of the same enterprise, are not isolated, and are not…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(C)(1) — 1 case
State v. Brown, 2025 Ohio 2804 (Ohio 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(D) — 2 cases
State v. Bricher, 2024 Ohio 394 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
State v. Keith, 610 N.E.2d 1071 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(E) — 113 cases
State v. Dent (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 6670 (Ohio 2020). “But federal congressional intent aside, an application of the plain language of Ohio’s statutes—R.C. 2923.31 and 2923.32—demonstrates that the state did not put forth sufficient evidence that Walker and Dent engaged in a pattern of corrupt activity.”
State v. Stevens, 2014 Ohio 1932 (Ohio 2014). “{¶ 59} Ohio, like many states, enacted its own version of RICO through the adoption of R.C. 2923.31 et seq. R.C. 2923.31 and 2923.”
In Re Nat'l Century Fin. Enter., Inc., 604 F. Supp. 2d 1128 (S.D. Ohio 2009).
State v. Miranda, 2014 Ohio 451 (Ohio 2014). ““Corrupt activity” is defined as any of the criminal offenses listed in R.C. 2923.31(1). And finally, a “pattern of corrupt *188 activity” means “two or more incidents of corrupt activity * * * that are related to the affairs of the same enterprise, are not isolated, and are not…”
State v. Siferd, 783 N.E.2d 591 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003). “32(A)(1) provides: “No person employed by, or associated with, any enterprise shall conduct or participate in, directly or indirectly, the affairs of the enterprise through a pattern of corrupt activity * * The elements of the offense are further defined in R.C. 2923.31, which…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(E)(2)(b) — 1 case
State v. Daboni, 2018 Ohio 4155 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(G) — 7 cases
In re Nicole Gas Prod., Ltd., 519 B.R. 723 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2014).
Passa v. City of Columbus, 748 F. Supp. 2d 804 (S.D. Ohio 2010).
U.S. Demolition & Contracting, Inc. v. O'Rourke Constr. Co., 640 N.E.2d 235 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994).
State v. Malone, 2016 Ohio 5556 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “Discussion {¶21} The trial court essentially made two substantive legal rulings regarding the term “enterprise” as it is used in R.C. 2923.31 et seq.: (1) The trial court concluded as a matter of law that a business which has had its articles of incorporation revoked by the Ohio…”
State v. Halka, 2021 Ohio 149 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(I) — 32 cases
State v. Ross, 2012 Ohio 536 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). “Instead, both counts alleged that Ross engaged in a pattern of corrupt activity that involved offenses “enumerated in this indictment that constitute corrupt activity as defined in Section 2923.31 of the Revised Code[.]” His indictment included charges of bribery and having an…”
State v. Miranda, 2014 Ohio 451 (Ohio 2014). ““Corrupt activity” is defined as any of the criminal offenses listed in R.C. 2923.31(1). And finally, a “pattern of corrupt *188 activity” means “two or more incidents of corrupt activity * * * that are related to the affairs of the same enterprise, are not isolated, and are not…”
State v. Stevens, 2014 Ohio 1932 (Ohio 2014). “{¶ 59} Ohio, like many states, enacted its own version of RICO through the adoption of R.C. 2923.31 et seq. R.C. 2923.31 and 2923.”
State v. Beverly (Slip Opinion), 2015 Ohio 219 (Ohio 2015). “32(A)(1), can be established without proving that the enterprise is a structure separate and distinct from a pattern of corrupt activity. {¶ 14} We emphasize that we reach our conclusion after analyzing the statutory scheme and applying it to the question before us.”
State v. Lester, 2020 Ohio 2988 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(I)(1) — 3 cases
State ex rel. Cuyahoga Cty. v. Jones Lang LaSalle Great Lakes Corp. Real Est. Partners, L.L.C., 2017 Ohio 4066 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Morgan, 642 N.E.2d 1090 (Ohio 1994).
State v. Morgan, 1994 Ohio 439 (Ohio 1994).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(I)(2) — 10 cases
State v. Adkins, 737 N.E.2d 1021 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). “The elements of that offense are further defined in R.C. 2923.31. Relevant definitions, in effect at the time of the offense alleged here, are as follows: “(C) ‘Enterprise’ includes any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust, union,…”
State v. Siferd, 783 N.E.2d 591 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003). “32(A)(1) provides: “No person employed by, or associated with, any enterprise shall conduct or participate in, directly or indirectly, the affairs of the enterprise through a pattern of corrupt activity * * The elements of the offense are further defined in R.C. 2923.31, which…”
Matthews v. New Century Mortg. Corp., 185 F. Supp. 2d 874 (S.D. Ohio 2002). “Therefore, the Court DENIES the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs’ common law fraud claim.”
Wilson v. Marino, 843 N.E.2d 849 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).
Eva v. Midwest Nat'l Mortg. Banc, Inc., 143 F. Supp. 2d 862 (N.D. Ohio 2001).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(I)(2)(C) — 1 case
State v. Nelms, 2020 Ohio 6845 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(I)(2)(a) — 13 cases
State v. Ross, 2012 Ohio 536 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). “Instead, both counts alleged that Ross engaged in a pattern of corrupt activity that involved offenses “enumerated in this indictment that constitute corrupt activity as defined in Section 2923.31 of the Revised Code[.]” His indictment included charges of bribery and having an…”
State v. Willan, 41 N.E.3d 366 (Ohio 2015).
State v. Willan, 2013 Ohio 2405 (Ohio 2013).
Med. Mut. of Ohio v. FrontPath Health Coalition, 2023 Ohio 243 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
McGee v. East Ohio Gas Co., 111 F. Supp. 2d 979 (S.D. Ohio 2000).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(I)(2)(b) — 3 cases
State v. Burkitt, 624 N.E.2d 210 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993).
State v. Wilson, 682 N.E.2d 5 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996).
State v. Gasser, 626 N.E.2d 127 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(I)(2)(c) — 50 cases
State v. Stevens, 2014 Ohio 1932 (Ohio 2014). “{¶ 59} Ohio, like many states, enacted its own version of RICO through the adoption of R.C. 2923.31 et seq. R.C. 2923.31 and 2923.”
State v. Dent (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 6670 (Ohio 2020). “But federal congressional intent aside, an application of the plain language of Ohio’s statutes—R.C. 2923.31 and 2923.32—demonstrates that the state did not put forth sufficient evidence that Walker and Dent engaged in a pattern of corrupt activity.”
State v. Adkins, 737 N.E.2d 1021 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). “The elements of that offense are further defined in R.C. 2923.31. Relevant definitions, in effect at the time of the offense alleged here, are as follows: “(C) ‘Enterprise’ includes any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust, union,…”
State v. Bricher, 2024 Ohio 394 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
State v. Burns, 2011 Ohio 4230 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(I)(2)(e) — 2 cases
State v. Stevens, 2014 Ohio 1932 (Ohio 2014). “{¶ 59} Ohio, like many states, enacted its own version of RICO through the adoption of R.C. 2923.31 et seq. R.C. 2923.31 and 2923.”
State v. Fritz, 896 N.E.2d 778 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(I)(3) — 2 cases
In Re Nat'l Century Fin. Enter., Inc., 604 F. Supp. 2d 1128 (S.D. Ohio 2009).
Unencumbered Assets, Trust v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, 604 F. Supp. 2d 1128 (S.D. Ohio 2009).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(I)(a) — 1 case
Hanlin v. Ohio Builders & Remodelers, Inc., 196 F. Supp. 2d 572 (S.D. Ohio 2001).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(I)(l) — 1 case
W. & S. Life Ins. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 54 F. Supp. 3d 888 (S.D. Ohio 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.31(L) — 2 cases
Passa v. City of Columbus, 748 F. Supp. 2d 804 (S.D. Ohio 2010).
State v. Feliciano, 685 N.E.2d 1307 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.