Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2929 - Ohio Revised Code | Ohio Laws
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25 (2026)

Community control sanctions - misdemeanor

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
April 4, 2023
Latest Legislation:
Senate Bill 288 - 134th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

(A)(1) Except as provided in sections 2929.22 and 2929.23 of the Revised Code or when a jail term is required by law, in sentencing an offender for a misdemeanor, other than a minor misdemeanor, the sentencing court may do either of the following:

(a) Directly impose a sentence that consists of one or more community control sanctions authorized by section 2929.26, 2929.27, or 2929.28 of the Revised Code. The court may impose any other conditions of release under a community control sanction that the court considers appropriate. If the court imposes a jail term upon the offender, the court may impose any community control sanction or combination of community control sanctions in addition to the jail term.

(b) Impose a jail term under section 2929.24 of the Revised Code from the range of jail terms authorized under that section for the offense, suspend all or a portion of the jail term imposed, and place the offender under a community control sanction or combination of community control sanctions authorized under section 2929.26, 2929.27, or 2929.28 of the Revised Code.

(2) The duration of all community control sanctions imposed upon an offender and in effect for an offender at any time shall not exceed five years.

(3) At sentencing, if a court directly imposes a community control sanction or combination of community control sanctions pursuant to division (A)(1)(a) or (B) of this section, the court shall state the duration of the community control sanctions imposed and shall notify the offender that if any of the conditions of the community control sanctions are violated the court may do any of the following:

(a) Impose a longer time under the same community control sanction if the total time under all of the offender's community control sanctions does not exceed the five-year limit specified in division (A)(2) of this section;

(b) Impose a more restrictive community control sanction under section 2929.26, 2929.27, or 2929.28 of the Revised Code, but the court is not required to impose any particular sanction or sanctions;

(c) Impose a definite jail term from the range of jail terms authorized for the offense under section 2929.24 of the Revised Code.

(B) If a court sentences an offender to any community control sanction or combination of community control sanctions pursuant to division (A)(1)(a) of this section, the sentencing court retains jurisdiction over the offender and the period of community control for the duration of the period of community control. Upon the motion of either party or on the court's own motion, the court, in the court's sole discretion and as the circumstances warrant, may modify the community control sanctions or conditions of release previously imposed, substitute a community control sanction or condition of release for another community control sanction or condition of release previously imposed, or impose an additional community control sanction or condition of release.

(C)(1) If a court sentences an offender to any community control sanction or combination of community control sanctions authorized under section 2929.26, 2929.27, or 2929.28 of the Revised Code, the court shall place the offender under the general control and supervision of the court or of a department of probation in the jurisdiction that serves the court for purposes of reporting to the court a violation of any of the conditions of the sanctions imposed. If the offender resides in another jurisdiction and a department of probation has been established to serve the municipal court or county court in that jurisdiction, the sentencing court may request the municipal court or the county court to receive the offender into the general control and supervision of that department of probation for purposes of reporting to the sentencing court a violation of any of the conditions of the sanctions imposed. The sentencing court retains jurisdiction over any offender whom it sentences for the duration of the sanction or sanctions imposed.

(2) The sentencing court shall require as a condition of any community control sanction that the offender abide by the law and not leave the state without the permission of the court or the offender's probation officer. In the interests of doing justice, rehabilitating the offender, and ensuring the offender's good behavior, the court may impose additional requirements on the offender. The offender's compliance with the additional requirements also shall be a condition of the community control sanction imposed upon the offender.

(D)(1) If the court imposing sentence upon an offender sentences the offender to any community control sanction or combination of community control sanctions authorized under section 2929.26, 2929.27, or 2929.28 of the Revised Code, and if the offender violates any of the conditions of the sanctions, the public or private person or entity that supervises or administers the program or activity that comprises the sanction shall report the violation directly to the sentencing court or to the department of probation or probation officer with general control and supervision over the offender. If the public or private person or entity reports the violation to the department of probation or probation officer, the department or officer shall report the violation to the sentencing court.

(2) Except as provided in division (D)(3) of this section, if an offender violates any condition of a community control sanction, the sentencing court may impose upon the violator one or more of the following penalties:

(a) A longer time under the same community control sanction if the total time under all of the community control sanctions imposed on the violator does not exceed the five-year limit specified in division (A)(2) of this section;

(b) A more restrictive community control sanction;

(c) A combination of community control sanctions, including a jail term.

(3) If an offender was acting pursuant to division (B)(2)(b) of section 2925.11 or a related provision under section 2925.12, 2925.14, or 2925.141 of the Revised Code and in so doing violated the conditions of a community control sanction based on a minor drug possession offense, as defined in section 2925.11 of the Revised Code, or violated section 2925.12, division (C)(1) of section 2925.14, or section 2925.141 of the Revised Code, the sentencing court shall not impose any of the penalties described in division (D)(2) of this section based on the violation.

(4) If the court imposes a jail term upon a violator pursuant to division (D)(2) of this section, the total time spent in jail for the misdemeanor offense and the violation of a condition of the community control sanction shall not exceed the maximum jail term available for the offense for which the sanction that was violated was imposed. The court may reduce the longer period of time that the violator is required to spend under the longer sanction or the more restrictive sanction imposed under division (D)(2) of this section by all or part of the time the violator successfully spent under the sanction that was initially imposed.

(E) Except as otherwise provided in this division, if an offender, for a significant period of time, fulfills the conditions of a community control sanction imposed pursuant to section 2929.26, 2929.27, or 2929.28 of the Revised Code in an exemplary manner, the court may reduce the period of time under the community control sanction or impose a less restrictive community control sanction. Fulfilling the conditions of a community control sanction does not relieve the offender of a duty to make restitution under section 2929.28 of the Revised Code.

Last updated February 17, 2023 at 4:48 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 257 cases (106 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: State v. Floyd, 2018 Ohio 5107 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Floyd, 2018 Ohio 5107 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 16× “25 gives a trial court two options when sentencing a misdemeanor offender to community control: (1) directly impose a sentence that consists of a community-control sanction; or (2) impose a jail term under R.”
Walton Hills v. Olesinski, 2020 Ohio 5618 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 17× “The ordinances do not govern the trial court’s discretion to impose community-control sanctions under R.C. 2929.25 and 2929.27. Thus, Olesinski’s constitutional arguments, in effect, challenge the language contained within the ordinances supporting his underlying convictions.”
Cleveland v. S.W. Invests., L.L.C., 2024 Ohio 1271 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 9× “Further, if the court finds a defendant in violation of community-control sanctions, it may impose one or more of the following penalties: (1) a longer time under the same community-control sanction so long as the total time does not exceed five years; (2) a more restrictive…”
State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion), 2018 Ohio 5132 (Ohio 2018). · cites it 2× “See generally R.C. 2929.25(A)(3)(c); State v. Jones, 2017- Ohio-943, 86 N.”
State v. Everson, 2018 Ohio 323 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 8× “The court may (1) “[d]irectly impose a sentence that consists of one or more community control sanctions * * *,” or (2) impose a jail term, suspend all or part of the jail term, and place the defendant under community control sanctions.”
State v. Sutton, 835 N.E.2d 752 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 17× “19(B)(5) concern felony sentencing, whereas R.C. 2929.25 applies to misdemeanor cases.”
State v. Blankenship, 949 N.E.2d 1087 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 7× “R.C. 2929.25(A)(1). The range of available community-control sanctions includes residential sanctions, such as a term in a halfway house; nonresidential sanctions, such as a period of house arrest; and financial sanctions, such as restitution.”
State v. Cintron, 2022 Ohio 305 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 6× “The trial court abused its discretion under R.C. 2929.25 when it ordered that Mr. Cintron pay child support.”
Cleveland v. Kushlak, 2024 Ohio 973 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 35× “The city contends that based upon the finding of a violation, the municipal court was authorized to modify Kushlak’s community-control conditions pursuant to R.C. 2929.25. Additionally, the city argues that any modification listed in the February 10, 2023 judgment entry is not…”
State v. Snell, 2019 Ohio 2251 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 14× “Snell argued that the no-contact order was contrary to law because the trial court failed to state a duration of time for the order as required by R.C. 2929.25. After reviewing the motion, the trial court held a resentencing hearing on August 13, 2018.”
Cleveland v. Kushlak, 2022 Ohio 4402 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 8× “If the offender violates any condition of the community control sanctions, the sentencing court may impose “one or more” of the following: (1) a longer period of community control provided that it does not exceed five years; (2) a more restrictive community control sanction; (3)…”
State v. Zappa, 2022 Ohio 243 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 4× “{¶36} A trial court also has the discretion to “substitute one or more community control sanctions under [R.”
Show all 257 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(2) — 2 cases
State v. Ogle, 2013 Ohio 3420 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
State v. Moschell, 2020 Ohio 6818 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(2)(a) — 1 case
Cleveland v. Sopjack, 2024 Ohio 6018 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(A) — 47 cases
State v. Fry, 2017 Ohio 9077 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
Westlake v. Y.O., 2019 Ohio 2432 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
State v. Garrison, 2018 Ohio 463 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
State v. Florence, 2014 Ohio 2337 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Wilson, 2018 Ohio 2805 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(A)(1) — 28 cases
State v. Blankenship, 949 N.E.2d 1087 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011). “R.C. 2929.25(A)(1). The range of available community-control sanctions includes residential sanctions, such as a term in a halfway house; nonresidential sanctions, such as a period of house arrest; and financial sanctions, such as restitution.”
Cleveland v. S.W. Invests., L.L.C., 2024 Ohio 1271 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “Further, if the court finds a defendant in violation of community-control sanctions, it may impose one or more of the following penalties: (1) a longer time under the same community-control sanction so long as the total time does not exceed five years; (2) a more restrictive…”
Conneaut v. Pushic, 2025 Ohio 1783 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
State v. Cowen, 854 N.E.2d 579 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006).
State v. Pierce, 2011 Ohio 4873 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(A)(1)(a) — 42 cases
Cleveland v. Kushlak, 2022 Ohio 4402 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “If the offender violates any condition of the community control sanctions, the sentencing court may impose “one or more” of the following: (1) a longer period of community control provided that it does not exceed five years; (2) a more restrictive community control sanction; (3)…”
Cleveland v. S.W. Invests., L.L.C., 2024 Ohio 1271 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “Further, if the court finds a defendant in violation of community-control sanctions, it may impose one or more of the following penalties: (1) a longer time under the same community-control sanction so long as the total time does not exceed five years; (2) a more restrictive…”
State v. Floyd, 2018 Ohio 5107 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “25 gives a trial court two options when sentencing a misdemeanor offender to community control: (1) directly impose a sentence that consists of a community-control sanction; or (2) impose a jail term under R.”
Cleveland v. Kushlak, 2024 Ohio 973 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “The city contends that based upon the finding of a violation, the municipal court was authorized to modify Kushlak’s community-control conditions pursuant to R.C. 2929.25. Additionally, the city argues that any modification listed in the February 10, 2023 judgment entry is not…”
Walton Hills v. Olesinski, 2020 Ohio 5618 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “The ordinances do not govern the trial court’s discretion to impose community-control sanctions under R.C. 2929.25 and 2929.27. Thus, Olesinski’s constitutional arguments, in effect, challenge the language contained within the ordinances supporting his underlying convictions.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(A)(1)(b) — 34 cases
State v. Zappa, 2022 Ohio 243 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “{¶36} A trial court also has the discretion to “substitute one or more community control sanctions under [R.”
State v. Henry, 2016 Ohio 680 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Everson, 2018 Ohio 323 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “The court may (1) “[d]irectly impose a sentence that consists of one or more community control sanctions * * *,” or (2) impose a jail term, suspend all or part of the jail term, and place the defendant under community control sanctions.”
State v. Pope, 2014 Ohio 2864 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Jones, 2020 Ohio 1273 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(A)(2) — 30 cases
State v. Snell, 2019 Ohio 2251 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “Snell argued that the no-contact order was contrary to law because the trial court failed to state a duration of time for the order as required by R.C. 2929.25. After reviewing the motion, the trial court held a resentencing hearing on August 13, 2018.”
State v. Blankenship, 949 N.E.2d 1087 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011). “R.C. 2929.25(A)(1). The range of available community-control sanctions includes residential sanctions, such as a term in a halfway house; nonresidential sanctions, such as a period of house arrest; and financial sanctions, such as restitution.”
State v. Bechtel, 2020 Ohio 4889 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
State v. Thames, 2022 Ohio 1715 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Coll, 2017 Ohio 7270 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(A)(3) — 20 cases
State v. Everson, 2018 Ohio 323 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “The court may (1) “[d]irectly impose a sentence that consists of one or more community control sanctions * * *,” or (2) impose a jail term, suspend all or part of the jail term, and place the defendant under community control sanctions.”
State v. Sutton, 835 N.E.2d 752 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005). “19(B)(5) concern felony sentencing, whereas R.C. 2929.25 applies to misdemeanor cases.”
State v. Russell, 2011 Ohio 1181 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
Cleveland v. Schornstein Holdings, L.L.C., 2016 Ohio 7479 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Geiger, 862 N.E.2d 914 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(A)(3)(a) — 4 cases
State v. Sutton, 835 N.E.2d 752 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005). “19(B)(5) concern felony sentencing, whereas R.C. 2929.25 applies to misdemeanor cases.”
State v. Coffer, 2020 Ohio 994 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
State v. Shorter, 22188 (4-25-2008), 2008 Ohio 1986 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008).
State v. Wacker, 2019 Ohio 3997 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(A)(3)(c) — 8 cases
State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion), 2018 Ohio 5132 (Ohio 2018). “See generally R.C. 2929.25(A)(3)(c); State v. Jones, 2017- Ohio-943, 86 N.”
State v. Bailey, 2016 Ohio 4937 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Sutton, 835 N.E.2d 752 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005). “19(B)(5) concern felony sentencing, whereas R.C. 2929.25 applies to misdemeanor cases.”
State v. Gibson, 2014 Ohio 433 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Coffer, 2020 Ohio 994 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(A)(3)(e) — 1 case
State v. Sutton, 835 N.E.2d 752 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005). “19(B)(5) concern felony sentencing, whereas R.C. 2929.25 applies to misdemeanor cases.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(B) — 24 cases
State v. Floyd, 2018 Ohio 5107 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “25 gives a trial court two options when sentencing a misdemeanor offender to community control: (1) directly impose a sentence that consists of a community-control sanction; or (2) impose a jail term under R.”
Walton Hills v. Olesinski, 2020 Ohio 5618 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “The ordinances do not govern the trial court’s discretion to impose community-control sanctions under R.C. 2929.25 and 2929.27. Thus, Olesinski’s constitutional arguments, in effect, challenge the language contained within the ordinances supporting his underlying convictions.”
Bay Vill. v. Barringer, 2015 Ohio 4079 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
Cleveland v. Kushlak, 2024 Ohio 973 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “The city contends that based upon the finding of a violation, the municipal court was authorized to modify Kushlak’s community-control conditions pursuant to R.C. 2929.25. Additionally, the city argues that any modification listed in the February 10, 2023 judgment entry is not…”
Miamisburg v. Hanson, 2016 Ohio 964 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(B)(1) — 5 cases
State v. Snell, 2019 Ohio 2251 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “Snell argued that the no-contact order was contrary to law because the trial court failed to state a duration of time for the order as required by R.C. 2929.25. After reviewing the motion, the trial court held a resentencing hearing on August 13, 2018.”
State v. Johnson, 2010 Ohio 2533 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
State v. Carr, 2021 Ohio 4556 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
State v. Yerkey, 2024 Ohio 4849 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
State v. Hosler, 2010 Ohio 980 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(B)(2) — 1 case
State v. Lewis, 2011 Ohio 4603 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(C) — 9 cases
State v. Floyd, 2018 Ohio 5107 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “25 gives a trial court two options when sentencing a misdemeanor offender to community control: (1) directly impose a sentence that consists of a community-control sanction; or (2) impose a jail term under R.”
State v. Baker, 2021 Ohio 272 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
Walton Hills v. Olesinski, 2020 Ohio 5618 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “The ordinances do not govern the trial court’s discretion to impose community-control sanctions under R.C. 2929.25 and 2929.27. Thus, Olesinski’s constitutional arguments, in effect, challenge the language contained within the ordinances supporting his underlying convictions.”
State v. J.M.S, 2019 Ohio 3383 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
Cleveland v. ProTerra, Inc., 2021 Ohio 1086 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(C)(1) — 3 cases
State v. Cintron, 2022 Ohio 305 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “The trial court abused its discretion under R.C. 2929.25 when it ordered that Mr. Cintron pay child support.”
State v. Marlow, 2019 Ohio 3393 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
State v. Hiles, 2019 Ohio 3330 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(C)(2) — 26 cases
State v. Blankenship, 949 N.E.2d 1087 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011). “R.C. 2929.25(A)(1). The range of available community-control sanctions includes residential sanctions, such as a term in a halfway house; nonresidential sanctions, such as a period of house arrest; and financial sanctions, such as restitution.”
State v. Ice, 2024 Ohio 5341 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
State v. Cintron, 2022 Ohio 305 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “The trial court abused its discretion under R.C. 2929.25 when it ordered that Mr. Cintron pay child support.”
State v. Wagener, 2022 Ohio 724 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
Cleveland v. Dickerson, 2016 Ohio 806 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(C)(3) — 1 case
State v. Blankenship, 949 N.E.2d 1087 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011). “R.C. 2929.25(A)(1). The range of available community-control sanctions includes residential sanctions, such as a term in a halfway house; nonresidential sanctions, such as a period of house arrest; and financial sanctions, such as restitution.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(D) — 7 cases
Walton Hills v. Olesinski, 2020 Ohio 5618 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “The ordinances do not govern the trial court’s discretion to impose community-control sanctions under R.C. 2929.25 and 2929.27. Thus, Olesinski’s constitutional arguments, in effect, challenge the language contained within the ordinances supporting his underlying convictions.”
Bay Vill. v. Barringer, 2015 Ohio 4079 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
State v. Wells, 2021 Ohio 2343 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
Olmsted Twp. v. Ritchie, 2022 Ohio 124 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Richter, 2014 Ohio 5396 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(D)(1) — 2 cases
Cleveland v. Cornely, 2021 Ohio 3459 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
State v. Strohl, 2018 Ohio 4266 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(D)(2) — 20 cases
Cleveland v. Schornstein Holdings, L.L.C., 2016 Ohio 7479 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
Cleveland v. Kushlak, 2024 Ohio 973 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “The city contends that based upon the finding of a violation, the municipal court was authorized to modify Kushlak’s community-control conditions pursuant to R.C. 2929.25. Additionally, the city argues that any modification listed in the February 10, 2023 judgment entry is not…”
Cleveland v. S.W. Invests., L.L.C., 2024 Ohio 1271 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “Further, if the court finds a defendant in violation of community-control sanctions, it may impose one or more of the following penalties: (1) a longer time under the same community-control sanction so long as the total time does not exceed five years; (2) a more restrictive…”
State v. Jones, 2020 Ohio 1273 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
State v. Saxon, 2017 Ohio 93 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(D)(2)(a) — 6 cases
State v. Taylor (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 3514 (Ohio 2020).
Cleveland v. Kushlak, 2024 Ohio 973 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “The city contends that based upon the finding of a violation, the municipal court was authorized to modify Kushlak’s community-control conditions pursuant to R.C. 2929.25. Additionally, the city argues that any modification listed in the February 10, 2023 judgment entry is not…”
State v. Sayers, 2023 Ohio 672 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
Cleveland v. Sopjack, 2024 Ohio 6018 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
State v. Briskey, 2012 Ohio 5340 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(D)(2)(c) — 5 cases
Olmsted Twp. v. Ritchie, 2022 Ohio 124 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Levesque, 2025 Ohio 2834 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
State v. Battigaglia, 2021 Ohio 1781 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
State v. Strohl, 2018 Ohio 4266 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
State v. McCleary, 2025 Ohio 5213 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(D)(3) — 4 cases
State v. Wallace, 2013 Ohio 2871 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
State v. Harris, 2012 Ohio 5612 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
State v. Daniel, 2015 Ohio 3826 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
State v. Richter, 2014 Ohio 5396 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(D)(4) — 4 cases
Olmsted Twp. v. Ritchie, 2022 Ohio 124 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Barnes, 2022 Ohio 1738 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Grose, 2026 Ohio 2011 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
State v. Houk, 2021 Ohio 4618 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(F) — 3 cases
State v. Garrison, 2018 Ohio 1048 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
State v. Stoneking, 2021 Ohio 1307 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
State v. Laney, 2023 Ohio 1058 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(F)(1)(a)(i) — 1 case
State v. Jackson-Williams, 2020 Ohio 1118 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(F)(1)(b) — 1 case
State v. Jenkins, 2018 Ohio 3697 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(a)(3) — 1 case
State v. Sutton, 835 N.E.2d 752 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005). “19(B)(5) concern felony sentencing, whereas R.C. 2929.25 applies to misdemeanor cases.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.25(c) — 1 case
State v. Kergan, 2012 Ohio 1407 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.