Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2930.08 (2026)

Notification of substantial delay in prosecution; victim objection to delay

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A)(1) The court and the prosecutor involved in the case shall take appropriate action to ensure a speedy disposition of the case.

(2) A victim has the right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay and a prompt conclusion of the case. The court and all participants shall endeavor to complete the case within the time frame provided by the Rules of Superintendence.

(B) If a motion, request, or agreement between the prosecutor and the defendant's or alleged juvenile offender's attorney is made in a case, including a motion, request, or agreement for a continuance of the case, and the motion, request, or agreement might result in a delay in the prosecution of the case, the prosecutor, if the victim or victim's representative has requested notice pursuant to section 2930.03 of the Revised Code, shall inform the victim and victim's representative, if applicable, that the motion, request, or agreement has been made and that it might result in a delay. If the victim, victim's representative, or victim's attorney, if applicable, objects to the delay, the prosecutor shall inform the court of the objections, and the court shall consider the objections and the victim's right to a speedy disposition of the case in ruling on the motion, request, or agreement.

(C) If the victim, victim's representative, or victim's attorney, if applicable, objects to a delay in the prosecution of the case, the court shall grant a motion, request, or agreement for a continuance of the case only if the party seeking the continuance demonstrates that the delay in the prosecution of the case is reasonable under the circumstances or is otherwise in the interest of justice. The court may grant a motion, request, or agreement for a continuance of the case only for the time necessary to serve the interests of justice. If a continuance is granted, the court shall state on the record or in a judgment entry the specific reason for the continuance.

Last updated March 21, 2023 at 4:53 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2001–2024 · leading case: State v. McCullough, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1235 (Ohio 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. McCullough, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1235 (Ohio 2001). · cites it 2× “He provides a copy of a journal entry, dated September 5, 2001, in which he found that his consideration of these letters was authorized by R.C. 2930.08. Attached to this journal entry are copies of the letters sent to Judge Pontious by the victim’s family.”
In re Disqualification of Pontious, 2001 Ohio 4105 (Ohio 2001). · cites it 3× “] Judges—Affidavit of disqualification—Judge’s receipt and consideration of unsolicited letters that relate solely to defendant’s request for a continuance are not evidence of bias or prejudice—General Assembly has required that judges consider the objections of crime victims to…”
State v. Kriwinsky, 2024 Ohio 2690 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “Second, Doe requested that the trial court set a trial date in accordance with R.C. 2930.08. Third, Doe requested that when the trial court sets a trial date, it will allow Doe and Doe’s counsel to attend the pretrial conference to ensure that Doe’s rights under R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.