Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2941.29 (2026)

Objection to defect in indictment or information

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No indictment or information shall be quashed, set aside, or dismissed, or motion to quash be sustained, or any motion for delay of sentence for the purpose of review be granted, nor shall any conviction be set aside or reversed on account of any defect in form or substance of the indictment or information, unless the objection to such indictment or information, specifically stating the defect claimed, is made prior to the commencement of the trial, or at such time thereafter as the court permits.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1958–2025 · leading case: State v. Colon, 885 N.E.2d 917 (Ohio 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Colon, 885 N.E.2d 917 (Ohio 2008). · cites it 2× “12(C) and R.C. 2941.29. {¶ 57} For these reasons, it is my view that the defect in Colon’s indictment is not structural in nature, and by failing to object at a time when it could have been corrected, Colon forfeited all but plain error related to that defect.”
State v. Lester, 2009-Ohio-4225, 916 N.E.2d 1038. · cites it 4× “7(D) and 12(C) and R.C. 2941.29 meaningless. Lester did not raise the issue of a defective indictment at any time during the pendency of the proceedings before the trial court.”
State v. Schmidt, 2014-Ohio-758. · cites it 4× “Similarly, R.C. 2941.29 provides: No indictment or information shall be quashed, set aside, or dismissed, * * * nor shall any conviction be set aside or reversed on account of any defect in form or substance of the indictment or information, unless the objection to such…”
State v. Burkitt, 624 N.E.2d 210 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 1993). “Appellant has not raised the issue himself on appeal, and the record before us does not reflect that a timely objection was made before trial.”
State v. Schee, 2017-Ohio-212. “Similarly, R.C. 2941.29 provides: No indictment or information shall be quashed, set aside, or dismissed,* * * nor shall any conviction be set aside or reversed on account of any defect in form or substance of the indictment or information, unless the objection to such…”
State v. Yates, 2012-Ohio-919. “{¶59} Accordingly, the final assignment of error is overruled. {¶60} Judgment affirmed. It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant costs herein taxed.”
State v. Henson, 2019-Ohio-229. “{¶ 14} Similarly, R.C. 2941.29 provides: No indictment or information shall be quashed, set aside, or dismissed, * * * nor shall any conviction be set aside or reversed on account of any defect in form or substance of the indictment or information, unless the objection to such…”
State v. Spradlin, 933 N.E.2d 1131 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 2010). “12(C)(2), however, provides that “failure * * * to charge an offense” is an exception to the general rule that failure to object waives the objection. {¶ 48} R.C. 2925.04(C) provides: “(1) Whoever commits a violation of division (A) of this section that involves any drug other…”
State v. Presler, 176 N.E.2d 308 (Ohio Ct. App. 3d Dist. 1960). “Such omission was fatal to the validity of the indictment, and the curative provisions of Sections 2941.29 and 2941.30, Revised Code, would not operate to permit the trial court to amend the indictment in the manner in which same was here done.”
State v. Gundlach, 174 N.E.2d 267 (Ohio Ct. App. 1960). · cites it 4× “” From the observations heretofore made in this opinion, it appears that the provisions of Section 2941.29, Revised Code, if for no other reason, require this court to overrule the first claim of error.”
State v. Hayes, 2016-Ohio-330. “R.C. 2941.29. Here, appellant did not object to the indictment prior to trial, nor did he object when he was charged with attempt to commit aggravated arson by information.”
State v. Rohn, 2020-Ohio-6918. “Also, R.C. 2941.29 states: “No indictment * * * shall be quashed, set aside, or dismissed, nor shall any conviction be set aside or reversed on account of any defect in form or substance of the indictment, * * * unless the objection to such 6 indictment * * *, specifically…”
Show all 23 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.