Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2950.011 (2026)

Sexually oriented offense; child-victim oriented offense

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as specifically provided to the contrary in sections 2950.02 to 2950.99 of the Revised Code, all references in any of those sections to "sexually oriented offense" include, in addition to the violations specified in division (A) of section 2950.01 of the Revised Code on and after January 1, 2008, any sexually oriented offense, as that term was defined in section 2950.01 of the Revised Code prior to January 1, 2008, that was committed prior to that date and that was not a registration exempt sexually oriented offense, as that term was defined in that section prior to January 1, 2008.

Except as specifically provided to the contrary in sections 2950.02 to 2950.99 of the Revised Code, all references in any of those sections to "child-victim oriented offense" include, in addition to the violations specified in division (C) of section 2950.01 of the Revised Code on and after January 1, 2008, any child-victim oriented offense, as that term was defined in section 2950.01 of the Revised Code prior to January 1, 2008, that was committed prior to that date.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2008–2010 · leading case: State v. Powell, 935 N.E.2d 85 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Powell, 935 N.E.2d 85 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “28, and R.C. 2950.011.” {¶ 35} While Powell appeals from the denial of his petition to vacate his plea, he makes other arguments in his brief that are not contained in the above assigned error.”
State v. Graves, 900 N.E.2d 1045 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008). “{¶ 9} We believe that clear declaration is found in R.C. 2950.011, which specifies, inter alia, that a “sexually oriented offense” for purposes of the AWA includes a “sexually oriented offense” committed prior to the effective date of the AWA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.