Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2951
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041 (2026)

Intervention in lieu of conviction

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
September 30, 2025
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 96 - 136th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

(A)(1) If an offender is charged with a criminal offense, including but not limited to a violation of section 2913.02, 2913.03, 2913.11, 2913.21, 2913.31, or 2919.21 of the Revised Code, and the court has reason to believe that drug or alcohol usage by the offender was a factor leading to the criminal offense with which the offender is charged or that, at the time of committing that offense, the offender had a mental illness, was a person with an intellectual disability, or was a victim of a violation of section 2905.32 or 2907.21 of the Revised Code and that the mental illness, status as a person with an intellectual disability, or fact that the offender was a victim of a violation of section 2905.32 or 2907.21 of the Revised Code was a factor leading to the offender's criminal behavior, the court may accept, prior to the entry of a guilty plea, the offender's request for intervention in lieu of conviction. The request shall include a statement from the offender as to whether the offender is alleging that drug or alcohol usage by the offender was a factor leading to the criminal offense with which the offender is charged or is alleging that, at the time of committing that offense, the offender had a mental illness, was a person with an intellectual disability, or was a victim of a violation of section 2905.32 or 2907.21 of the Revised Code and that the mental illness, status as a person with an intellectual disability, or fact that the offender was a victim of a violation of section 2905.32 or 2907.21 of the Revised Code was a factor leading to the criminal offense with which the offender is charged. The request also shall include a waiver of the defendant's right to a speedy trial, the preliminary hearing, the time period within which the grand jury may consider an indictment against the offender, and arraignment, unless the hearing, indictment, or arraignment has already occurred. Unless an offender alleges that drug or alcohol usage by the offender was a factor leading to the criminal offense with which the offender is charged, the court may reject an offender's request without a hearing. If the court elects to consider an offender's request or the offender alleges that drug or alcohol usage by the offender was a factor leading to the criminal offense with which the offender is charged, the court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether the offender is eligible under this section for intervention in lieu of conviction and shall stay all criminal proceedings pending the outcome of the hearing. If the court schedules a hearing, the court shall order an assessment of the offender for the purpose of determining the offender's program eligibility for intervention in lieu of conviction and recommending an appropriate intervention plan.

If the offender alleges that drug or alcohol usage by the offender was a factor leading to the criminal offense with which the offender is charged, the court may order that the offender be assessed by a community addiction services provider or a properly credentialed professional for the purpose of determining the offender's program eligibility for intervention in lieu of conviction and recommending an appropriate intervention plan. The community addiction services provider or the properly credentialed professional shall provide a written assessment of the offender to the court.

(2) The victim notification provisions of division (E) of section 2930.06 of the Revised Code apply in relation to any hearing held under division (A)(1) of this section.

(B) An offender is eligible for intervention in lieu of conviction if the court finds all of the following:

(1) The offender previously has not been convicted of or pleaded guilty to any felony offense of violence.

(2) The offense is not a felony of the first, second, or third degree, is not an offense of violence, is not a felony sex offense, is not a violation of division (A)(1) or (2) of section 2903.06 of the Revised Code, is not a violation of division (A)(1) of section 2903.08 of the Revised Code, is not a violation of division (A) of section 4511.19 of the Revised Code or a municipal ordinance that is substantially similar to that division, and is not an offense for which a sentencing court is required to impose a mandatory prison term.

(3) The offender is not charged with a violation of section 2925.02, 2925.04, or 2925.06 of the Revised Code, is not charged with a violation of section 2925.03 of the Revised Code that is a felony of the first, second, third, or fourth degree, and is not charged with a violation of section 2925.11 of the Revised Code that is a felony of the first or second degree.

(4) If an offender alleges that drug or alcohol usage by the offender was a factor leading to the criminal offense with which the offender is charged, the court has ordered that the offender be assessed by a community addiction services provider or a properly credentialed professional for the purpose of determining the offender's program eligibility for intervention in lieu of conviction and recommending an appropriate intervention plan, the offender has been assessed by a community addiction services provider of that nature or a properly credentialed professional in accordance with the court's order, and the community addiction services provider or properly credentialed professional has filed the written assessment of the offender with the court.

(5) If an offender alleges that, at the time of committing the criminal offense with which the offender is charged, the offender had a mental illness, was a person with an intellectual disability, or was a victim of a violation of section 2905.32 or 2907.21 of the Revised Code and that the mental illness, status as a person with an intellectual disability, or fact that the offender was a victim of a violation of section 2905.32 or 2907.21 of the Revised Code was a factor leading to that offense, the offender has been assessed by a psychiatrist, psychologist, independent social worker, licensed professional clinical counselor, or independent marriage and family therapist for the purpose of determining the offender's program eligibility for intervention in lieu of conviction and recommending an appropriate intervention plan.

(6) The offender's drug usage, alcohol usage, mental illness, or intellectual disability, or the fact that the offender was a victim of a violation of section 2905.32 or 2907.21 of the Revised Code, whichever is applicable, was a factor leading to the criminal offense with which the offender is charged, intervention in lieu of conviction would not demean the seriousness of the offense, and intervention would substantially reduce the likelihood of any future criminal activity.

(7) The alleged victim of the offense was not sixty-five years of age or older, permanently and totally disabled, under thirteen years of age, or a peace officer engaged in the officer's official duties at the time of the alleged offense.

(8) If the offender is charged with a violation of section 2925.24 of the Revised Code, the alleged violation did not result in physical harm to any person.

(9) The offender is willing to comply with all terms and conditions imposed by the court pursuant to division (D) of this section.

(10) The offender is not charged with an offense that would result in the offender being disqualified under Chapter 4506. of the Revised Code from operating a commercial motor vehicle or would subject the offender to any other sanction under that chapter.

(C) At the conclusion of a hearing held pursuant to division (A) of this section, the court shall determine whether the offender will be granted intervention in lieu of conviction. In making this determination, the court shall presume that intervention in lieu of conviction is appropriate. If the court finds under this division and division (B) of this section that the offender is eligible for intervention in lieu of conviction, the court shall grant the offender's request unless the court finds specific reasons to believe that the candidate's participation in intervention in lieu of conviction would be inappropriate.

If the court denies an eligible offender's request for intervention in lieu of conviction, the court shall state the reasons for the denial, with particularity, in a written entry.

If the court grants the offender's request, the court shall accept the offender's plea of guilty and waiver of the defendant's right to a speedy trial, the preliminary hearing, the time period within which the grand jury may consider an indictment against the offender, and arraignment, unless the hearing, indictment, or arraignment has already occurred. In addition, the court then may stay all criminal proceedings and order the offender to comply with all terms and conditions imposed by the court pursuant to division (D) of this section. If the court finds that the offender is not eligible or does not grant the offender's request, the criminal proceedings against the offender shall proceed as if the offender's request for intervention in lieu of conviction had not been made.

(D) If the court grants an offender's request for intervention in lieu of conviction, all of the following apply:

(1) The court shall place the offender under the general control and supervision of one of the following, as if the offender was subject to a community control sanction imposed under section 2929.15, 2929.18, or 2929.25 of the Revised Code:

(a) The county probation department, the adult parole authority, or another appropriate local probation or court services agency, if one exists;

(b) If the court grants the request for intervention in lieu of conviction during the period commencing on April 4, 2023, and ending on October 15, 2025, a community-based correctional facility.

(2) The court shall establish an intervention plan for the offender.

(3) The terms and conditions of the intervention plan required under division (D)(2) of this section shall require the offender, for at least one year, but not more than five years, from the date on which the court grants the order of intervention in lieu of conviction, to abstain from the use of illegal drugs and alcohol, to participate in treatment and recovery support services, and to submit to regular random testing for drug and alcohol use and may include any other treatment terms and conditions, or terms and conditions similar to community control sanctions, which may include community service or restitution, that are ordered by the court.

(E) If the court grants an offender's request for intervention in lieu of conviction and the court finds that the offender has successfully completed the intervention plan for the offender, including the requirement that the offender abstain from using illegal drugs and alcohol for a period of at least one year, but not more than five years, from the date on which the court granted the order of intervention in lieu of conviction, the requirement that the offender participate in treatment and recovery support services, and all other terms and conditions ordered by the court, the court shall dismiss the proceedings against the offender. Successful completion of the intervention plan and period of abstinence under this section shall be without adjudication of guilt and is not a criminal conviction for purposes of any disqualification or disability imposed by law and upon conviction of a crime, and the court may order the sealing or expungement of records related to the offense in question, as a dismissal of the charges, in the manner provided in sections 2953.31, 2953.33, 2953.37, and 2953.521 of the Revised Code and divisions (H), (K), and (L) of section 2953.34 of the Revised Code.

(F) If the court grants an offender's request for intervention in lieu of conviction and the offender fails to comply with any term or condition imposed as part of the intervention plan for the offender, the supervising authority for the offender promptly shall advise the court of this failure, and the court shall hold a hearing to determine whether the offender failed to comply with any term or condition imposed as part of the plan. If the court determines that the offender has failed to comply with any of those terms and conditions, it may continue the offender on intervention in lieu of conviction, continue the offender on intervention in lieu of conviction with additional terms, conditions, and sanctions, including placing the offender under the general control and supervision of a community-based correctional facility, or enter a finding of guilty and impose an appropriate sanction under Chapter 2929. of the Revised Code. If the court sentences the offender to a prison term, the court, after consulting with the department of rehabilitation and correction regarding the availability of services, may order continued court-supervised activity and treatment of the offender during the prison term and, upon consideration of reports received from the department concerning the offender's progress in the program of activity and treatment, may consider judicial release under section 2929.20 of the Revised Code.

(G) As used in this section:

(1) "Community addiction services provider" has the same meaning as in section 5119.01 of the Revised Code.

(2) "Community control sanction" has the same meaning as in section 2929.01 of the Revised Code.

(3) "Intervention in lieu of conviction" means any court-supervised activity that complies with this section.

(4) "Intellectual disability" has the same meaning as in section 5123.01 of the Revised Code.

(5) "Peace officer" has the same meaning as in section 2935.01 of the Revised Code.

(6) "Mental illness" and "psychiatrist" have the same meanings as in section 5122.01 of the Revised Code.

(7) "Psychologist" has the same meaning as in section 4732.01 of the Revised Code.

(8) "Felony sex offense" means a violation of a section contained in Chapter 2907. of the Revised Code that is a felony.

Last updated August 4, 2025 at 3:48 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 172 cases (33 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case: State v. Niesen-Pennycuff, 2012 Ohio 2730 (Ohio 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Niesen-Pennycuff, 2012 Ohio 2730 (Ohio 2012). · cites it 64× “2011-1070—Submitted February 8, 2012—Decided June 21, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Warren County, No.”
State v. Massien, 2010 Ohio 1864 (Ohio 2010). · cites it 26× “If the offender fails to comply with any term or condition imposed as part of the intervention plan, the court shall enter a finding of guilt and impose the appropriate sanction.”
State v. Shoaf, 746 N.E.2d 674 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 23× “Shoaf, defendant-appellee, after he violated the conditions of treatment in lieu of conviction pursuant to R.C. 2951.041. We reverse and remand. On April 30, 1998, appellee was indicted by a grand jury for five counts of deception to obtain dangerous drugs, a violation of R.”
State v. South (Slip Opinion), 2015 Ohio 3930 (Ohio 2015). · cites it 12× “” 13 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO {¶ 37} This type of thinking led to R.C. 2951.041(B)(2), which ties the hands of the trial courts by excluding drunk drivers from the case-by-case attention regularly given to other offenders dealing with addiction.”
State v. McLaughlin, 808 N.E.2d 893 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 27× “Because the trial court applied the wrong version of R.C. 2951.041 in this matter, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
State v. Kuhn, 2018 Ohio 4065 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 21× “{¶ 3} On May 2, 2016, Kuhn filed a motion with the trial court requesting she be granted ILC in accordance with R.C. 2951.041. Pursuant to that statute, if an offender is charged with a crime, and the trial court has reason to believe that drug or alcohol use was a factor…”
State v. Rice, 906 N.E.2d 506 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 15× “Defendant requested intervention in lieu of conviction pursuant to R.C. 2951.041. The trial court denied defendant’s request without a hearing.”
State v. Stanovich, 878 N.E.2d 641 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 22× “{¶ 3} In January 2006, Stanovich moved for intervention under R.C. 2951.041. {¶ 4} In February 2006, Stanovich underwent a chemical-dependency evaluation, which indicated that he would be an appropriate candidate for intervention.”
State v. Miles, 2017 Ohio 7639 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 16× “-2- {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Domoniq Miles asserts that the trial court, after electing to consider his motion, filed under R.C. 2951.041, for intervention in lieu of conviction (ILC), erred by overruling the motion without conducting the hearing required when a court considers…”
State v. Branch, 2013 Ohio 2350 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 10× ““In enacting R.C. 2951.041, the legislature made a determination that when chemical abuse is the cause or at least a precipitating factor in the commission of a crime, it may be more beneficial to the individual and the community as a whole to treat the cause rather than punish…”
State v. Leisten, 853 N.E.2d 673 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 11× “) {¶ 5} Intervention in lieu of conviction is governed by R.C. 2951.041. “That section permits a court which determines that an alleged offender would benefit from substance abuse treatment to commit him or her to its probation department for that purpose, avoiding trial and a…”
State v. Cabannis, 2021 Ohio 1376 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 32× “{¶3} A day before trial, appellant, through counsel, filed a motion to withdraw her jury trial demand and requested that the court schedule the case for hearing on a motion for ILC under R.C. 2951.041. The trial court canceled the jury trial, ordered the ILC motion to be filed…”
Show all 172 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(A) — 20 cases
State v. Rice, 906 N.E.2d 506 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009). “Defendant requested intervention in lieu of conviction pursuant to R.C. 2951.041. The trial court denied defendant’s request without a hearing.”
State v. Miles, 2017 Ohio 7639 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “-2- {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Domoniq Miles asserts that the trial court, after electing to consider his motion, filed under R.C. 2951.041, for intervention in lieu of conviction (ILC), erred by overruling the motion without conducting the hearing required when a court considers…”
State v. Branch, 2013 Ohio 2350 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). ““In enacting R.C. 2951.041, the legislature made a determination that when chemical abuse is the cause or at least a precipitating factor in the commission of a crime, it may be more beneficial to the individual and the community as a whole to treat the cause rather than punish…”
State v. Cabannis, 2021 Ohio 1376 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “{¶3} A day before trial, appellant, through counsel, filed a motion to withdraw her jury trial demand and requested that the court schedule the case for hearing on a motion for ILC under R.C. 2951.041. The trial court canceled the jury trial, ordered the ILC motion to be filed…”
State v. Stanton, 2013 Ohio 1825 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(A)(1) — 55 cases
State v. Massien, 2010 Ohio 1864 (Ohio 2010). “If the offender fails to comply with any term or condition imposed as part of the intervention plan, the court shall enter a finding of guilt and impose the appropriate sanction.”
State v. Niesen-Pennycuff, 2012 Ohio 2730 (Ohio 2012). “2011-1070—Submitted February 8, 2012—Decided June 21, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Warren County, No.”
State v. Roome, 2017 Ohio 4230 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Branch, 2013 Ohio 2350 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). ““In enacting R.C. 2951.041, the legislature made a determination that when chemical abuse is the cause or at least a precipitating factor in the commission of a crime, it may be more beneficial to the individual and the community as a whole to treat the cause rather than punish…”
State v. Rice, 906 N.E.2d 506 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009). “Defendant requested intervention in lieu of conviction pursuant to R.C. 2951.041. The trial court denied defendant’s request without a hearing.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(B) — 41 cases
State v. Massien, 2010 Ohio 1864 (Ohio 2010). “If the offender fails to comply with any term or condition imposed as part of the intervention plan, the court shall enter a finding of guilt and impose the appropriate sanction.”
State v. Miles, 2017 Ohio 7639 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “-2- {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Domoniq Miles asserts that the trial court, after electing to consider his motion, filed under R.C. 2951.041, for intervention in lieu of conviction (ILC), erred by overruling the motion without conducting the hearing required when a court considers…”
State v. Rice, 906 N.E.2d 506 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009). “Defendant requested intervention in lieu of conviction pursuant to R.C. 2951.041. The trial court denied defendant’s request without a hearing.”
State v. Cabannis, 2021 Ohio 1376 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “{¶3} A day before trial, appellant, through counsel, filed a motion to withdraw her jury trial demand and requested that the court schedule the case for hearing on a motion for ILC under R.C. 2951.041. The trial court canceled the jury trial, ordered the ILC motion to be filed…”
State v. Baker, 2012 Ohio 729 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(B)(1) — 25 cases
State v. Massien, 2010 Ohio 1864 (Ohio 2010). “If the offender fails to comply with any term or condition imposed as part of the intervention plan, the court shall enter a finding of guilt and impose the appropriate sanction.”
State v. Taylor, 2014 Ohio 2821 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Chandler, 2016 Ohio 164 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Leisten, 853 N.E.2d 673 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006). “) {¶ 5} Intervention in lieu of conviction is governed by R.C. 2951.041. “That section permits a court which determines that an alleged offender would benefit from substance abuse treatment to commit him or her to its probation department for that purpose, avoiding trial and a…”
State v. Stanovich, 878 N.E.2d 641 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007). “{¶ 3} In January 2006, Stanovich moved for intervention under R.C. 2951.041. {¶ 4} In February 2006, Stanovich underwent a chemical-dependency evaluation, which indicated that he would be an appropriate candidate for intervention.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(B)(10) — 2 cases
State v. Pettigrew, 2026 Ohio 2312 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
State v. Schneider, 2025 Ohio 4625 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(B)(2) — 11 cases
State v. South (Slip Opinion), 2015 Ohio 3930 (Ohio 2015). “” 13 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO {¶ 37} This type of thinking led to R.C. 2951.041(B)(2), which ties the hands of the trial courts by excluding drunk drivers from the case-by-case attention regularly given to other offenders dealing with addiction.”
State v. Schmidt, 776 N.E.2d 113 (Ohio Ct. App. 2002).
State v. Seawell, 2020 Ohio 155 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
State v. Cabannis, 2021 Ohio 1376 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “{¶3} A day before trial, appellant, through counsel, filed a motion to withdraw her jury trial demand and requested that the court schedule the case for hearing on a motion for ILC under R.C. 2951.041. The trial court canceled the jury trial, ordered the ILC motion to be filed…”
State v. Brown, 849 N.E.2d 87 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(B)(3) — 4 cases
State v. Schmidt, 776 N.E.2d 113 (Ohio Ct. App. 2002).
State v. Seawell, 2020 Ohio 155 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
State v. Pena, 638 N.E.2d 626 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994).
State v. Hayes, 2025 Ohio 2483 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(B)(4) — 3 cases
State v. White, 2019 Ohio 1159 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
State v. Kubisen, 2017 Ohio 8781 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Burns, 2015 Ohio 5336 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(B)(5) — 1 case
State v. Ray, 910 N.E.2d 34 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(B)(6) — 20 cases
State v. Panzeca, 2020 Ohio 326 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
State v. Baker, 2012 Ohio 729 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
State v. Turner, 805 N.E.2d 124 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004).
State v. Branch, 2013 Ohio 2350 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). ““In enacting R.C. 2951.041, the legislature made a determination that when chemical abuse is the cause or at least a precipitating factor in the commission of a crime, it may be more beneficial to the individual and the community as a whole to treat the cause rather than punish…”
State v. Stanovich, 878 N.E.2d 641 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007). “{¶ 3} In January 2006, Stanovich moved for intervention under R.C. 2951.041. {¶ 4} In February 2006, Stanovich underwent a chemical-dependency evaluation, which indicated that he would be an appropriate candidate for intervention.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(B)(7) — 10 cases
State v. Sorrell, 931 N.E.2d 1135 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
State v. Cabannis, 2021 Ohio 1376 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “{¶3} A day before trial, appellant, through counsel, filed a motion to withdraw her jury trial demand and requested that the court schedule the case for hearing on a motion for ILC under R.C. 2951.041. The trial court canceled the jury trial, ordered the ILC motion to be filed…”
State v. Ray, 910 N.E.2d 34 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009).
State v. Drake, 948 N.E.2d 965 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
State v. Atkins, 2012 Ohio 4744 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(B)(9) — 2 cases
State v. Allen, 2018 Ohio 305 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
State v. Burns, 2015 Ohio 5336 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(C) — 33 cases
State v. Miller, 2017 Ohio 478 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Massien, 2010 Ohio 1864 (Ohio 2010). “If the offender fails to comply with any term or condition imposed as part of the intervention plan, the court shall enter a finding of guilt and impose the appropriate sanction.”
State v. Stanovich, 878 N.E.2d 641 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007). “{¶ 3} In January 2006, Stanovich moved for intervention under R.C. 2951.041. {¶ 4} In February 2006, Stanovich underwent a chemical-dependency evaluation, which indicated that he would be an appropriate candidate for intervention.”
State v. Miles, 2017 Ohio 7639 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “-2- {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Domoniq Miles asserts that the trial court, after electing to consider his motion, filed under R.C. 2951.041, for intervention in lieu of conviction (ILC), erred by overruling the motion without conducting the hearing required when a court considers…”
State v. Drager, 853 N.E.2d 1180 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(D) — 27 cases
State v. South (Slip Opinion), 2015 Ohio 3930 (Ohio 2015). “” 13 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO {¶ 37} This type of thinking led to R.C. 2951.041(B)(2), which ties the hands of the trial courts by excluding drunk drivers from the case-by-case attention regularly given to other offenders dealing with addiction.”
State v. Massien, 2010 Ohio 1864 (Ohio 2010). “If the offender fails to comply with any term or condition imposed as part of the intervention plan, the court shall enter a finding of guilt and impose the appropriate sanction.”
State v. Burdette, 2011 Ohio 4425 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
State v. Davis, 2017 Ohio 8479 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Shoaf, 746 N.E.2d 674 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). “Shoaf, defendant-appellee, after he violated the conditions of treatment in lieu of conviction pursuant to R.C. 2951.041. We reverse and remand. On April 30, 1998, appellee was indicted by a grand jury for five counts of deception to obtain dangerous drugs, a violation of R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(D)(3) — 2 cases
State v. J.B., 2025 Ohio 3143 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
State v. Williams, 2024 Ohio 788 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(D)(A) — 1 case
State v. Broadt, 2014 Ohio 370 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(E) — 31 cases
State v. Niesen-Pennycuff, 2012 Ohio 2730 (Ohio 2012). “2011-1070—Submitted February 8, 2012—Decided June 21, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Warren County, No.”
State v. Massien, 2010 Ohio 1864 (Ohio 2010). “If the offender fails to comply with any term or condition imposed as part of the intervention plan, the court shall enter a finding of guilt and impose the appropriate sanction.”
State v. Dopart, 2014 Ohio 2901 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Benson, 2019 Ohio 4635 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
Campbell v. 1 Spring, L.L.C., 2024 Ohio 308 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(F) — 27 cases
State v. Shoaf, 746 N.E.2d 674 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). “Shoaf, defendant-appellee, after he violated the conditions of treatment in lieu of conviction pursuant to R.C. 2951.041. We reverse and remand. On April 30, 1998, appellee was indicted by a grand jury for five counts of deception to obtain dangerous drugs, a violation of R.”
State v. Kuhn, 2018 Ohio 4065 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “{¶ 3} On May 2, 2016, Kuhn filed a motion with the trial court requesting she be granted ILC in accordance with R.C. 2951.041. Pursuant to that statute, if an offender is charged with a crime, and the trial court has reason to believe that drug or alcohol use was a factor…”
State v. South (Slip Opinion), 2015 Ohio 3930 (Ohio 2015). “” 13 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO {¶ 37} This type of thinking led to R.C. 2951.041(B)(2), which ties the hands of the trial courts by excluding drunk drivers from the case-by-case attention regularly given to other offenders dealing with addiction.”
State v. Massien, 2010 Ohio 1864 (Ohio 2010). “If the offender fails to comply with any term or condition imposed as part of the intervention plan, the court shall enter a finding of guilt and impose the appropriate sanction.”
State v. Abi-Aazar, 777 N.E.2d 327 (Ohio Ct. App. 2002).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2951.041(H) — 3 cases
In Re Eastway, 642 N.E.2d 1135 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994).
State v. Fortado, 671 N.E.2d 622 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996).
United States v. Hollins, 863 F. Supp. 563 (N.D. Ohio 1994).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.