Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2953
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2953.01 (2026)

Appeals and post-conviction remedies definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
October 1, 1953
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 1 - 100th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

The definition of "magistrate" set forth in section 2931.01 of the Revised Code applies to Chapter 2953. of the Revised Code.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1954–2024 · leading case: State v. Rockey, 2019 Ohio 4101 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Rockey, 2019 Ohio 4101 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “; see also R.C. 2953.01. The record available to the court at the time it sentenced Rockey, which included his criminal history, provided much, if not all, of the information the court needed, and the two-day interval between his trial and his sentencing hearing -9- was not too…”
State v. Bridges, 2024 Ohio 1967 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 3× “R.C. 2953.01(B)(1) & (2) & (4) and (D)(1) & (2) & (3).”
Poppa v. Wanamaker, 128 N.E.2d 764 (Ohio Ct. App. 1954). “), and appeals in criminal cases (§2953.01, et seq., R. C.), does not disclose any requirement that a defendant in a criminal case be furnished, free of charge, for the purposes of appeal or mere examination, a bill of exceptions.”
State v. Trunzo, 137 N.E.2d 511 (Ohio Ct. App. 1956). “), and appeals in criminal cases (§2953.01 et seq., R. C.), does not disclose any requirement that a defendant in a criminal case be furnished, free of charge, for the purposes of appeal or mere examination, a bill of exceptions.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2953.01(B)(1): 1 case
State v. Bridges, 2024 Ohio 1967 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “R.C. 2953.01(B)(1) & (2) & (4) and (D)(1) & (2) & (3).”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2953.01(B)(2): 1 case
State v. Bridges, 2024 Ohio 1967 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “R.C. 2953.01(B)(1) & (2) & (4) and (D)(1) & (2) & (3).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.