Notes of Decisions
Cited in
123
cases (
40 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case:
State v. Smith, 104 Ohio St. 3d 106 (Ohio 2004).
State v. Smith, 104 Ohio St. 3d 106 (Ohio 2004).
· cites it 23× “R.C. 2971.01(G) and (L). A “ ‘[sjexually violent predator’ means a person who has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to committing, on or after January 1, 1997, a sexually violent offense and is likely to engage in the future in one or more sexually violent offenses.”
State v. Frierson, 2019 Ohio 317 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 18× “Sexually Violent Predator Specifications {¶5} In his first assignment of error, Frierson argues that the trial court committed plain error when it found him guilty of the sexually violent predator specifications because the application of R.”
State v. Pyle, 2018 Ohio 3160 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 12× “The plain language of R.C. 2971.01 “unambiguously requires that the three following factors exist before a defendant may be labeled as a sexually violent predator: (1) that on or after January 1, 1997; (2) he commits a sexually violent offense; and (3) it is likely that he will…”
State v. Underwood, 2010 Ohio 1 (Ohio 2010).
· cites it 4× “As used in this division, ‘designated homicide, assault, or kidnapping offense’ and ‘violent sex offense’ have the same meanings as in section 2971.01 of the Revised Code. As used in this division, ‘adjudicated a sexually violent predator’ has the same meaning as in section 2929.”
State v. Belle, 2019 Ohio 787 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 9× “{¶34} R.C. 2971.01(H)(1) defines a “sexually violent predator” as “a person who, on or after January 1, 1997, commits a sexually violent offense and is likely to engage in the future in one or more sexually violent offenses.”
State v. T.E.H., 2017 Ohio 4140 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 12× “R.C. 2971.01(G) and (L). For purposes of determining whether a person meets the definition of a sexually violent predator: [A]ny of the following factors may be considered as evidence tending to indicate that there is a likelihood that the person will engage in the future in one…”
State v. Townsend, 2019 Ohio 1134 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 9× “Prior to April 29, 2005, R.C. 2971.01(H)(1) defined a “sexually violent predator” as “a person who has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to committing, on or after January 1, 1997, a sexually violent offense and is likely to engage in the future in one or more sexually violent…”
State v. Clipps, 2019 Ohio 3569 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 11× “7 At the time appellant allegedly committed the rape offense charged in Count 2 of the 1998 indictment, R.C. 2971.01(H)(1) defined a “sexually violent predator” as “a person who has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to committing, on or after [January 1, 1997], a sexually…”
State v. Cartwright, 2013 Ohio 2156 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 14× “*** (B) In determining for purposes of this section whether a person is a sexually violent predator, all of the factors set forth in divisions (H)(1) to (6) [sic] of section 2971.01 of the Revised Code that apply regarding the person may be considered as evidence tending to…”
State v. Jones, 2001 Ohio 1341 (Ohio 2001).
· cites it 4× “{¶ 10} Because the offenses appellee was found guilty of committing are sexually violent offenses as defined in R.C. 2971.01(G) and 2971.01(L)(1), proceedings were held to determine whether appellee was guilty of the sexually violent predator specifications contained in the…”
State v. Ingels, 2018 Ohio 724 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 12× “R.C. 2971.01(H)(1), as it provided in 1998 when Ingels was sentenced, defined a “sexually violent predator” as “a person who has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to committing, on or after January 1, 1997, a sexually violent offense and is likely to engage in the future in…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(1) — 2 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(A)(3)(d)(iii) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(B) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(C) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(G) — 6 cases
State v. Jones, 2001 Ohio 1341 (Ohio 2001).
“{¶ 10} Because the offenses appellee was found guilty of committing are sexually violent offenses as defined in R.C. 2971.01(G) and 2971.01(L)(1), proceedings were held to determine whether appellee was guilty of the sexually violent predator specifications contained in the…”
State v. Smith, 104 Ohio St. 3d 106 (Ohio 2004).
“R.C. 2971.01(G) and (L). A “ ‘[sjexually violent predator’ means a person who has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to committing, on or after January 1, 1997, a sexually violent offense and is likely to engage in the future in one or more sexually violent offenses.”
State v. T.E.H., 2017 Ohio 4140 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
“R.C. 2971.01(G) and (L). For purposes of determining whether a person meets the definition of a sexually violent predator: [A]ny of the following factors may be considered as evidence tending to indicate that there is a likelihood that the person will engage in the future in one…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(G)(1) — 2 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(G)(2) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(H) — 26 cases
State v. T.E.H., 2017 Ohio 4140 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
“R.C. 2971.01(G) and (L). For purposes of determining whether a person meets the definition of a sexually violent predator: [A]ny of the following factors may be considered as evidence tending to indicate that there is a likelihood that the person will engage in the future in one…”
State v. Jones, 2001 Ohio 1341 (Ohio 2001).
“{¶ 10} Because the offenses appellee was found guilty of committing are sexually violent offenses as defined in R.C. 2971.01(G) and 2971.01(L)(1), proceedings were held to determine whether appellee was guilty of the sexually violent predator specifications contained in the…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(H)(1) — 76 cases
State v. Smith, 104 Ohio St. 3d 106 (Ohio 2004).
“R.C. 2971.01(G) and (L). A “ ‘[sjexually violent predator’ means a person who has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to committing, on or after January 1, 1997, a sexually violent offense and is likely to engage in the future in one or more sexually violent offenses.”
State v. Frierson, 2019 Ohio 317 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“Sexually Violent Predator Specifications {¶5} In his first assignment of error, Frierson argues that the trial court committed plain error when it found him guilty of the sexually violent predator specifications because the application of R.”
State v. Townsend, 2019 Ohio 1134 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“Prior to April 29, 2005, R.C. 2971.01(H)(1) defined a “sexually violent predator” as “a person who has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to committing, on or after January 1, 1997, a sexually violent offense and is likely to engage in the future in one or more sexually violent…”
State v. Clipps, 2019 Ohio 3569 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“7 At the time appellant allegedly committed the rape offense charged in Count 2 of the 1998 indictment, R.C. 2971.01(H)(1) defined a “sexually violent predator” as “a person who has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to committing, on or after [January 1, 1997], a sexually…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(H)(2) — 41 cases
State v. Belle, 2019 Ohio 787 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“{¶34} R.C. 2971.01(H)(1) defines a “sexually violent predator” as “a person who, on or after January 1, 1997, commits a sexually violent offense and is likely to engage in the future in one or more sexually violent offenses.”
State v. Pyle, 2018 Ohio 3160 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
“The plain language of R.C. 2971.01 “unambiguously requires that the three following factors exist before a defendant may be labeled as a sexually violent predator: (1) that on or after January 1, 1997; (2) he commits a sexually violent offense; and (3) it is likely that he will…”
State v. T.E.H., 2017 Ohio 4140 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
“R.C. 2971.01(G) and (L). For purposes of determining whether a person meets the definition of a sexually violent predator: [A]ny of the following factors may be considered as evidence tending to indicate that there is a likelihood that the person will engage in the future in one…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(H)(2)(C) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(H)(2)(a) — 28 cases
State v. Pyle, 2018 Ohio 3160 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
“The plain language of R.C. 2971.01 “unambiguously requires that the three following factors exist before a defendant may be labeled as a sexually violent predator: (1) that on or after January 1, 1997; (2) he commits a sexually violent offense; and (3) it is likely that he will…”
State v. Belle, 2019 Ohio 787 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“{¶34} R.C. 2971.01(H)(1) defines a “sexually violent predator” as “a person who, on or after January 1, 1997, commits a sexually violent offense and is likely to engage in the future in one or more sexually violent offenses.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(H)(2)(b) — 3 cases
State v. Cartwright, 2013 Ohio 2156 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
“*** (B) In determining for purposes of this section whether a person is a sexually violent predator, all of the factors set forth in divisions (H)(1) to (6) [sic] of section 2971.01 of the Revised Code that apply regarding the person may be considered as evidence tending to…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(H)(2)(c) — 10 cases
State v. Cartwright, 2013 Ohio 2156 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
“*** (B) In determining for purposes of this section whether a person is a sexually violent predator, all of the factors set forth in divisions (H)(1) to (6) [sic] of section 2971.01 of the Revised Code that apply regarding the person may be considered as evidence tending to…”
State v. T.E.H., 2017 Ohio 4140 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
“R.C. 2971.01(G) and (L). For purposes of determining whether a person meets the definition of a sexually violent predator: [A]ny of the following factors may be considered as evidence tending to indicate that there is a likelihood that the person will engage in the future in one…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(H)(2)(d) — 2 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(H)(2)(e) — 2 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(H)(2)(f) — 15 cases
State v. Belle, 2019 Ohio 787 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“{¶34} R.C. 2971.01(H)(1) defines a “sexually violent predator” as “a person who, on or after January 1, 1997, commits a sexually violent offense and is likely to engage in the future in one or more sexually violent offenses.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(I) — 6 cases
State v. Jones, 2001 Ohio 1341 (Ohio 2001).
“{¶ 10} Because the offenses appellee was found guilty of committing are sexually violent offenses as defined in R.C. 2971.01(G) and 2971.01(L)(1), proceedings were held to determine whether appellee was guilty of the sexually violent predator specifications contained in the…”
State v. Pyle, 2018 Ohio 3160 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
“The plain language of R.C. 2971.01 “unambiguously requires that the three following factors exist before a defendant may be labeled as a sexually violent predator: (1) that on or after January 1, 1997; (2) he commits a sexually violent offense; and (3) it is likely that he will…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(J) — 20 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(K) — 3 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(L) — 3 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(L)(1) — 10 cases
State v. Smith, 104 Ohio St. 3d 106 (Ohio 2004).
“R.C. 2971.01(G) and (L). A “ ‘[sjexually violent predator’ means a person who has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to committing, on or after January 1, 1997, a sexually violent offense and is likely to engage in the future in one or more sexually violent offenses.”
State v. Frierson, 2019 Ohio 317 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“Sexually Violent Predator Specifications {¶5} In his first assignment of error, Frierson argues that the trial court committed plain error when it found him guilty of the sexually violent predator specifications because the application of R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2971.01(L)(3) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.