A person aggrieved by the decision of the board of county commissioners may appeal to the court of common pleas, as provided by and under the authority of Chapter 2506. of the Revised Code. The court shall advance such appeal when perfected for immediate trial.
Where a board of county commissioners has adopted administrative regulations pursuant to various enabling sections of the Revised Code, such regulations may provide for an appeal or variance therefrom to a higher administrative authority, or board of appeals or variances, which authority or board is appointed by the board of county commissioners. The decisions of such higher authority or board of appeals or variances shall be considered, a "final order" as described in section 2506.01 of the Revised Code.
Cincinnati Milacron, Inc. v. Doughman, 64 Ohio St. 3d 585 (Ohio 1992). · cites it 2דwere made applicable to decisions of boards of county commissioners in 1963, when the General Assembly amended R.C. 307.56 to provide: “A person aggrieved by the decision of the board of county commissioners may appeal to the court of common pleas, as provided by and under the…”
State Ex Rel. Teamsters Local Union No. 436 v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 2012-Ohio-1861, 132 Ohio St. 3d 47. “R.C. 307.56. Pursuant to R.C. 145.297(B), “[ejvery retirement incentive *53 plan shall include provisions for the timely and impartial resolution of grievances and disputes arising under the plan.”
Engelhart v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 2016-Ohio-4935, 69 N.E.3d 137. · cites it 2ד56 provides that “[a] person aggrieved by the decision of the board of county commissioners may appeal to the court of common pleas, as provided by and under the authority of Chapter 2506 of the Revised Code.”
Bd. of Trs. v. for Incorporation of Holiday City, 70 Ohio St. 3d 365 (Ohio 1994). · cites it 2ד, supra, this court held that township trustees do not have standing under R.C. 307.56 and 2506.01 to participate in an appeal from a decision of a board of county commissioners denying an annexation petition, but that the trustees do have standing to pursue an R.”
Alesi v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 2014-Ohio-5192, 24 N.E.3d 667. “In addition, R.C. 307.56 provides that "[a] person aggrieved by the decision of the board of county commissioners may appeal to the court of common pleas, as provided by and under the authority of Chapter 2506 of the Revised Code.”
Ryan v. Tracy, 453 N.E.2d 661 (Ohio 1983). “R.C. 307.56. In the instant action, however, no ruling by the commissioners is at issue.”
In Re Appeal of Jefferson Twp. Bd. of Trs., 605 N.E.2d 435 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1992). “” The Supreme Court has interpreted this provision in the context of an annexation proceeding and held that: “ * * * In addition, R.C. 307.56 provides an appeal to the court of common pleas, under R.”
In re Appeal of Bass Lake Cmty., Inc., 449 N.E.2d 771 (Ohio 1983). “In addition, R.C. 307.56 provides an appeal to the court of common pleas, under R.”
Bd. of Lucas Cnty. Commissioners v. Waterville Twp. Bd. of Trs., 870 N.E.2d 791 (Ohio Ct. App. 6th Dist. 2007). “The trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to issue the January 30, 2006 Opinion and Judgment Entry finding that the petition filed by the Circulators on April 11, 2003 was invalid, since the Appellees’ August 4, 2004 counterclaim and cross-claim did not comply with R.C.…”
Application of Latham, 214 N.E.2d 681 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1965). · cites it 12דThe appellants then appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County. On July 1, 1965, the Court of Common Pleas dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and the present appeal is from that order.”
Goetz v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners of Butler Cnty., 517 N.E.2d 244 (Ohio Ct. App. 12th Dist. 1986). · cites it 4דSua sponte, this court raises the following assignment of error: “Does an appeal lie from a resolution of a board of county commissioners granting or refusing a petition to vacate a highway under R.C. 307.56 and R.C. Chapter 2506?” In pertinent part, R.”
Toledo Edison Co. v. Bd. of Defiance Cty. Commrs., 2013-Ohio-5374, 4 N.E.3d 458. · cites it 3ד12-01- 058 to the Defiance County Court of Common Pleas pursuant to R.C. 307.56 and 2506. (Doc. No. 1). That same day, Toledo Edison also filed a motion to stay execution of the resolution pending the administrative appeal, which the trial court granted on May 23, 2012.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.