Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05 (2026)

Other computing and calculating guidelines

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When a court computes the amount of child support required to be paid under a court child support order or a child support enforcement agency computes the amount of child support to be paid pursuant to an administrative child support order, all of the following apply:

(A) The parents' current and past income and personal earnings shall be verified by electronic means or with suitable documents, including, but not limited to, paystubs, employer statements, receipts and expense vouchers related to self-generated income, tax returns, and all supporting documentation and schedules for the tax returns.

(B) The annual amount of any court-ordered spousal support actually paid, excluding any ordered payment on arrears, shall be deducted from the annual income of that parent to the extent that payment of that court-ordered spousal support is verified by supporting documentation.

(C) The court or agency shall adjust the amount of child support paid by a parent to give credit for children not included in the current calculation. When calculating the adjusted amount, the court or agency shall use the schedule and do the following:

(1) Determine the amount of child support that each parent would be ordered to pay for all children for whom the parent has the legal duty to support, according to each parent's annual income. If the number of children subject to the order is greater than six, multiply the amount for three children in accordance with division (C)(4) of this section to determine the amount of child support.

(2) Compute a child support credit amount for each parent's children who are not subject to this order by dividing the amount determined in division (C)(1) of this section by the total number of children whom the parent is obligated to support and multiplying that number by the number of the parent's children who are not subject to this order.

(3) Determine the adjusted income of the parents by subtracting the credit for minor children not subject to this order computed under division (C)(2) of this section, from the annual income of each parent for the children each has a duty to support that are not subject to this order.

(4) If the number of children is greater than six, multiply the amount for three children by:

(a) 1.440 for seven children;

(b) 1.540 for eight children;

(c) 1.638 for nine children;

(d) 1.734 for ten children;

(e) 1.827 for eleven children;

(f) 1.919 for twelve children;

(g) 2.008 for thirteen children;

(h) 2.096 for fourteen children;

(i) 2.182 for more than fourteen children.

(D) When the court or agency calculates the annual income of a parent, it shall include the lesser of the following as income from overtime and bonuses:

(1) The yearly average of all overtime, commissions, and bonuses received during the three years immediately prior to the time when the person's child support obligation is being computed;

(2) The total overtime, commissions, and bonuses received during the year immediately prior to the time when the person's child support obligation is being computed.

(E) When the court or agency calculates the annual income of a parent, it shall not include any income earned by the spouse of that parent.

(F) The court shall issue a separate medical support order for extraordinary medical expenses, including orthodontia, dental, optical, and psychological services.

If the court makes an order for payment of private education, and other appropriate expenses, it shall do so by issuing a separate order.

The court may consider these expenses in adjusting a child support order.

(G) When a court or agency calculates the amount of child support to be paid pursuant to a court child support order or an administrative child support order, the following shall apply:

(1) The court or agency shall apply the basic child support schedule to the parents' combined annual incomes and to each parent's individual income.

(2) If the combined annual income of both parents or the individual annual income of a parent is an amount that is between two amounts set forth in the first column of the schedule, the court or agency may use the basic child support obligation that corresponds to the higher of the two amounts in the first column of the schedule, use the basic child support obligation that corresponds to the lower of the two amounts in the first column of the schedule, or calculate a basic child support obligation that is between those two amounts and corresponds proportionally to the parents' actual combined annual income or the individual parent's annual income.

(3) If the annual individual income of either or both of the parents is within the self-sufficiency reserve in the basic child support schedule, the court or agency shall do both of the following:

(a) Calculate the basic child support obligation for the parents using the schedule amount applicable to the combined annual income and the schedule amount applicable to the income in the self-sufficiency reserve;

(b) Determine the lesser of the following amounts to be the applicable basic child support obligation:

(i) The amount that results from using the combined annual income of the parents not in the self-sufficiency reserve of the schedule; or

(ii) The amount that results from using the individual parent's income within the self-sufficiency reserve of the schedule.

(H) When the court or agency calculates annual income, the court or agency, when appropriate, may average income over a reasonable period of years.

(I) Unless it would be unjust or inappropriate and therefore not in the best interests of the child, a court or agency shall not determine a parent to be voluntarily unemployed or underemployed and shall not impute income to that parent if any of the following conditions exist:

(1) The parent is receiving recurring monetary income from means-tested public assistance benefits, including cash assistance payments under the Ohio works first program established under Chapter 5107. of the Revised Code, general assistance under former Chapter 5113. of the Revised Code, supplemental security income, or means-tested veterans' benefits;

(2) The parent is approved for social security disability insurance benefits because of a mental or physical disability, or the court or agency determines that the parent is unable to work based on medical documentation that includes the diagnosis of a physician, certified nurse-midwife, clinical nurse specialist, or certified nurse practitioner and the physician's or nurse's opinion regarding the parent's mental or physical disability and inability to work.

(3) The parent has proven that the parent has made continuous and diligent efforts without success to find and accept employment, including temporary employment, part-time employment, or employment at less than the parent's previous salary or wage.

(4) The parent is complying with court-ordered family reunification efforts in a child abuse, neglect, or dependency proceeding, to the extent that compliance with those efforts limits the parent's ability to earn income.

(5) The parent is institutionalized for a period of twelve months or more with no other available income or assets.

(J) When a court or agency calculates the income of a parent, it shall not determine a parent to be voluntarily unemployed or underemployed and shall not impute income to that parent if the parent is incarcerated.

(K) When a court or agency requires a parent to pay an amount for that parent's failure to support a child for a period of time prior to the date the court modifies or issues a court child support order or an agency modifies or issues an administrative child support order for the current support of the child, the court or agency shall calculate that amount using the basic child support schedule, worksheets, and child support laws in effect, and the incomes of the parents as they existed, for that prior period of time.

(L) A court or agency may disregard a parent's additional income from overtime or additional employment when the court or agency finds that the additional income was generated primarily to support a new or additional family member or members, or under other appropriate circumstances.

(M) If both parents involved in the immediate child support determination have a prior order for support relative to a minor child or children born to both parents, the court or agency shall collect information about the existing order or orders and consider those together with the current calculation for support to ensure that the total of all orders for all children of the parties does not exceed the amount that would have been ordered if all children were addressed in a single judicial or administrative proceeding.

(N) A support obligation of a parent with annual income subject to the self-sufficiency reserve of the basic child support schedule shall not exceed the support obligation that would result from application of the schedule without the reserve.

(O) Any non-means tested benefit received by the child or children subject to the order resulting from the claims of either parent shall be deducted from that parent's annual child support obligation after all other adjustments have been made. If that non-means tested benefit exceeds the child support obligation of the parent from whose claim the benefit is realized, the child support obligation for that parent shall be zero.

(P) As part of the child support calculation, the parents shall be ordered to share the costs of child care. Subject to the limitations in this division, a child support obligor shall pay an amount equal to the obligor's income share of the child care cost incurred for the child or children subject to the order.

(1) The child care cost used in the calculation:

(a) Shall be for the child determined to be necessary to allow a parent to work, or for activities related to employment training;

(b) Shall be verifiable by credible evidence as determined by a court or child support enforcement agency;

(c) Shall exclude any reimbursed or subsidized child care cost, including any state or federal tax credit for child care available to the parent or caretaker, whether or not claimed

(d) Shall not exceed the maximum state-wide average cost estimate as determined in accordance with 45 C.F.R. 98.45.

(2) When the annual income of the obligor is subject to the self-sufficiency reserve of the basic support schedule, the share of the child care cost paid by the obligor shall be equal to the lower of the obligor's income share of the child care cost, or fifty per cent of the child care cost.

(Q) As used in this section, a parent is considered "incarcerated" if the parent is confined under a sentence imposed for an offense or serving a term of imprisonment, jail, or local incarceration, or other term under a sentence imposed by a government entity authorized to order such confinement.

Last updated February 18, 2025 at 5:19 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 166 cases (50 in the last 5 years), 2002–2026 · leading case: A.S. v. J.W. (Slip Opinion), 2019 Ohio 2473 (Ohio 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
A.S. v. J.W. (Slip Opinion), 2019 Ohio 2473 (Ohio 2019). · cites it 59× “R.C. 3119.05 contains a number of provisions relevant to the calculation of a parent’s income and the determination of a child-support award.”
Ostmann v. Ostmann, 858 N.E.2d 831 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 7× “{¶ 55} After a careful review of the record, this court concludes that the trial court adhered to the mandate of R.C. 3119.05 and its judgment was supported by competent, credible evidence.”
Martindale v. Martindale, 2019 Ohio 3028 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 8× “01(C)(12) defines “gross income” as follows: “Gross income” means, except as excluded in division (C)(12) of this section, the total of all earned and unearned income from all sources during a calendar year, whether or not the income is taxable, and includes income from…”
Habtemariam v. Worku, 2020 Ohio 3044 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 5× “19AP-47 7 {¶ 16} R.C. 3119.05, which provides requirements for the computation of child support, provides in pertinent part: When a court computes the amount of child support required to be paid under a court child support order * * * all of the following apply: (A) The parents'…”
Reynolds-Cornett v. Reynolds, 2014 Ohio 2893 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 7× “{¶ 20} In addition, R.C. 3119.05(A) requires a parent's income to "be verified by electronic means or with suitable documents, including, but not limited to, paystubs, employer statements, receipts, and expense vouchers related to self-generated income, tax returns, and all…”
In re A.D., 2023 Ohio 2442 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 5× “9, which directs the juvenile court to review documents listed in R.C. 3119.05(A) to establish income before calculating its child-support orders.”
Poling v. Poling, 2013 Ohio 5141 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 10× “R.C. 3119.05 provides in relevant part: (D) When the court or agency calculates the gross income of a parent, it shall include the lesser of the following as income from overtime and bonuses: (1) The yearly average of all overtime, commissions, and bonuses received during the…”
Kairn v. Clark, 2014 Ohio 1890 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 9× “That has recently been modified by O.R.C. 3119.05(I)(2) however, in this case, the Hearing Officer finds, pursuant to O.”
Swedlow v. Riegler, 2013 Ohio 5562 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 6× “{¶33} Further, Revised Code Section 3119.05(I) does not prohibit a finding that the obligor is voluntarily unemployed or underemployed, and, thus, the imputation of income to a child support obligor, if it is just, appropriate and in the best interests of the child.”
Foster v. Foster, 780 N.E.2d 1041 (Ohio Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 3× “{¶ 12} When determining a parent’s income for purposes of calculating child support, the trial court must verify the income “with suitable documents, including, but not limited to, paystubs, employer statements, receipts and expense vouchers related to self-generated income, tax…”
Desensi v. Eppley, 2025 Ohio 2471 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 23× “{¶21} The magistrate found that, pursuant to R.C. 3119.05, a parent has a statutory duty to verify income with documentation.”
Brose v. Copeland, 2013 Ohio 3399 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 14× “215 are applicable in cases implicating R.C. 3119.05. See Basham v. Basham, 3d Dist.”
Show all 166 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(A) — 49 cases
In re A.D., 2023 Ohio 2442 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “9, which directs the juvenile court to review documents listed in R.C. 3119.05(A) to establish income before calculating its child-support orders.”
Martindale v. Martindale, 2019 Ohio 3028 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “01(C)(12) defines “gross income” as follows: “Gross income” means, except as excluded in division (C)(12) of this section, the total of all earned and unearned income from all sources during a calendar year, whether or not the income is taxable, and includes income from…”
Reynolds-Cornett v. Reynolds, 2014 Ohio 2893 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “{¶ 20} In addition, R.C. 3119.05(A) requires a parent's income to "be verified by electronic means or with suitable documents, including, but not limited to, paystubs, employer statements, receipts, and expense vouchers related to self-generated income, tax returns, and all…”
Brose v. Copeland, 2013 Ohio 3399 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). “215 are applicable in cases implicating R.C. 3119.05. See Basham v. Basham, 3d Dist.”
In Re S.S.L.S., 2013 Ohio 3026 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(B) — 12 cases
Foy v. Foy, 2016 Ohio 242 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
Habtemariam v. Worku, 2020 Ohio 3044 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “19AP-47 7 {¶ 16} R.C. 3119.05, which provides requirements for the computation of child support, provides in pertinent part: When a court computes the amount of child support required to be paid under a court child support order * * * all of the following apply: (A) The parents'…”
Wolf-Sabatino v. Sabatino, 2014 Ohio 1252 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
Doubler v. Doubler, 2023 Ohio 393 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
Mayberry v. Mayberry, 2016 Ohio 1031 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(B)(12)(e) — 1 case
Suppan v. Suppan, 2023 Ohio 249 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(C) — 2 cases
Michaels v. Saunders, 2015 Ohio 3172 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
Gebremikael v. Aruma, 2022 Ohio 3686 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(C)(1) — 1 case
Gebremikael v. Aruma, 2022 Ohio 3686 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(C)(2) — 1 case
Gebremikael v. Aruma, 2022 Ohio 3686 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(D) — 24 cases
A.S. v. J.W. (Slip Opinion), 2019 Ohio 2473 (Ohio 2019). “R.C. 3119.05 contains a number of provisions relevant to the calculation of a parent’s income and the determination of a child-support award.”
Poling v. Poling, 2013 Ohio 5141 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). “R.C. 3119.05 provides in relevant part: (D) When the court or agency calculates the gross income of a parent, it shall include the lesser of the following as income from overtime and bonuses: (1) The yearly average of all overtime, commissions, and bonuses received during the…”
Benjelloun v. Benjelloun, 2012 Ohio 5353 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
Reynolds-Cornett v. Reynolds, 2014 Ohio 2893 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “{¶ 20} In addition, R.C. 3119.05(A) requires a parent's income to "be verified by electronic means or with suitable documents, including, but not limited to, paystubs, employer statements, receipts, and expense vouchers related to self-generated income, tax returns, and all…”
A.S. v. J.W., 2018 Ohio 1001 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(D)(1) — 5 cases
A.S. v. J.W. (Slip Opinion), 2019 Ohio 2473 (Ohio 2019). “R.C. 3119.05 contains a number of provisions relevant to the calculation of a parent’s income and the determination of a child-support award.”
Ostmann v. Ostmann, 858 N.E.2d 831 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006). “{¶ 55} After a careful review of the record, this court concludes that the trial court adhered to the mandate of R.C. 3119.05 and its judgment was supported by competent, credible evidence.”
Lanzilotta v. Lanzilotta, 2013 Ohio 4050 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
R.A.R. v. C.E.R., 2023 Ohio 232 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
Stratton-Phillips v. Phillips, 2024 Ohio 2399 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(D)(2) — 3 cases
Ostmann v. Ostmann, 858 N.E.2d 831 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006). “{¶ 55} After a careful review of the record, this court concludes that the trial court adhered to the mandate of R.C. 3119.05 and its judgment was supported by competent, credible evidence.”
A.S. v. J.W. (Slip Opinion), 2019 Ohio 2473 (Ohio 2019). “R.C. 3119.05 contains a number of provisions relevant to the calculation of a parent’s income and the determination of a child-support award.”
R.A.R. v. C.E.R., 2023 Ohio 232 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(E) — 4 cases
Burks v. Burks, 2019 Ohio 4292 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
In re K.P, 2012 Ohio 1094 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
Li v. Yang, 2012 Ohio 2491 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
Glatley v. Glatley, 2018 Ohio 1077 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(F) — 2 cases
Irish v. Irish, 2011 Ohio 3111 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
Qi v. Yang, 2012 Ohio 5542 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(H) — 26 cases
A.S. v. J.W. (Slip Opinion), 2019 Ohio 2473 (Ohio 2019). “R.C. 3119.05 contains a number of provisions relevant to the calculation of a parent’s income and the determination of a child-support award.”
Habtemariam v. Worku, 2020 Ohio 3044 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “19AP-47 7 {¶ 16} R.C. 3119.05, which provides requirements for the computation of child support, provides in pertinent part: When a court computes the amount of child support required to be paid under a court child support order * * * all of the following apply: (A) The parents'…”
Akin v. Akin, 2011 Ohio 2765 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
Watson v. Watson, 2023 Ohio 3719 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
Trombley v. Trombley, 2018 Ohio 1880 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(I) — 13 cases
Schutz v. Schutz, 2017 Ohio 695 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
Swedlow v. Riegler, 2013 Ohio 5562 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). “{¶33} Further, Revised Code Section 3119.05(I) does not prohibit a finding that the obligor is voluntarily unemployed or underemployed, and, thus, the imputation of income to a child support obligor, if it is just, appropriate and in the best interests of the child.”
Kairn v. Clark, 2014 Ohio 1890 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “That has recently been modified by O.R.C. 3119.05(I)(2) however, in this case, the Hearing Officer finds, pursuant to O.”
Lake Cty. Dept. of Job & Fam. Servs. v. Bailey, 2020 Ohio 986 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
Martindale v. Martindale, 2019 Ohio 3028 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “01(C)(12) defines “gross income” as follows: “Gross income” means, except as excluded in division (C)(12) of this section, the total of all earned and unearned income from all sources during a calendar year, whether or not the income is taxable, and includes income from…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(I)(1) — 1 case
Swedlow v. Riegler, 2013 Ohio 5562 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). “{¶33} Further, Revised Code Section 3119.05(I) does not prohibit a finding that the obligor is voluntarily unemployed or underemployed, and, thus, the imputation of income to a child support obligor, if it is just, appropriate and in the best interests of the child.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(I)(2) — 8 cases
Kairn v. Clark, 2014 Ohio 1890 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “That has recently been modified by O.R.C. 3119.05(I)(2) however, in this case, the Hearing Officer finds, pursuant to O.”
Long v. Long, 2014 Ohio 5715 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
Naiman v. Naiman, 2025 Ohio 1589 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
Carver v. Carver, 2015 Ohio 3941 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
Pannell v. McCall, 2025 Ohio 915 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(I)(3) — 1 case
Desensi v. Eppley, 2025 Ohio 2471 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “{¶21} The magistrate found that, pursuant to R.C. 3119.05, a parent has a statutory duty to verify income with documentation.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(I)(5) — 1 case
A.L.D. v. L.N.S., 2022 Ohio 959 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(J) — 6 cases
A.L.D. v. L.N.S., 2022 Ohio 959 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
Kreitzer v. Anderson, 811 N.E.2d 607 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004).
Davis v. Honaker, 2014 Ohio 171 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
Devito v. Devito, 2024 Ohio 2234 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
Brosky v. Krebs, 2018 Ohio 5261 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(K) — 2 cases
Graham v. Graham, 2020 Ohio 1435 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
In re D.H., 2026 Ohio 2182 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(O) — 2 cases
Hock v. Soles, 2022 Ohio 3531 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
Dobbins v. Dobbins, 2020 Ohio 4000 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.05(P)(1)(c) — 1 case
In re B.A.K., 2022 Ohio 1443 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.