Notes of Decisions
Cited in
133
cases (
33 in the last 5 years), 2005–2026 · leading case:
Mossing-Landers v. Landers, 2016 Ohio 7625 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
Mossing-Landers v. Landers, 2016 Ohio 7625 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 23× “Parties are entitled to file for modification at any time under R.C. 3119.79, assuming they can prove a change in circumstances under that section, and assuming they did not agree to forego attempts to modify support.”
Phelps v. Saffian, 2016 Ohio 5514 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 9× “{¶13} When the parties to a child support order collectively earn more than $150,000, what constitutes a substantial change of circumstances from the original support order is unclear.”
Funkhouser v. Funkhouser, 2019 Ohio 733 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 10× “{¶ 35} Appellant’s request for the trial court to modify the existing child support order was governed by R.C. 3119.79. Carver v. Carver, 6th Dist.”
Haun v. Haun, 2019 Ohio 5408 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 10× “{¶9} R.C. 3119.79 governs motions to modify child support.”
Adams v. Adams, 2012 Ohio 5131 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 13× “{¶20} R.C. 3119.79 sets forth the necessary criteria and methodology for a trial court to modify an existing child support order as follows: (A) If an obligor or obligee under a child support order requests that the court modify the amount of support required to be paid pursuant…”
Abbey v. Peavy, 2014 Ohio 3921 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 11× “” {¶17} Abbey argues that the Bonner court and, thus, the magistrate in this case, interpreted R.C. 3119.79 incorrectly. Abbey maintains that under R.”
Hock v. Soles, 2022 Ohio 3531 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
· cites it 20× “CHILD SUPPORT MODIFICATION STATUTE {¶19} The parties contest the relationship between division (A) and (C) of R.C. 3119.79. The statute contains the following three sections: (A) If an obligor or obligee under a child support order requests that the court modify the amount of…”
Abrams v. Abrams, 2017 Ohio 4319 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 5× “{¶ 40} " 'In order to modify child support, the trial court must find a substantial change in circumstances, which is defined in R.C. 3119.79(A) as a ten-percent deviation from the amount of child support previously ordered.”
Sapinsley v. Sapinsley, 869 N.E.2d 702 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 7× “We held that the trial court erred by failing to “strictly comply with the terms of R.C. 3119.79 by completing a child-support worksheet and including it in the record.”
Adams v. Adams, 2013 Ohio 2947 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 10× “79 controls the modification of child support orders and provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (A) If an obligor or obligee under a child support order requests that the court modify the amount of support required to be paid pursuant to the child support order, the court…”
Mahlerwein v. Mahlerwein, 828 N.E.2d 153 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).
· cites it 3× “{¶ 33} R.C. 3119.79(A) provides: “If an obligor or obligee under a child support order requests that the court modify the amount of support required to be paid pursuant to the child support order, the court shall recalculate the amount of *576 support that would be required to…”
Trombley v. Trombley, 2018 Ohio 1880 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 4× “Pursuant to R.C. 3119.79, a prior child support obligation may not be modified absent a showing of a substantial change in circumstances.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.79(A) — 95 cases
Mossing-Landers v. Landers, 2016 Ohio 7625 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
“Parties are entitled to file for modification at any time under R.C. 3119.79, assuming they can prove a change in circumstances under that section, and assuming they did not agree to forego attempts to modify support.”
Abrams v. Abrams, 2017 Ohio 4319 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
“{¶ 40} " 'In order to modify child support, the trial court must find a substantial change in circumstances, which is defined in R.C. 3119.79(A) as a ten-percent deviation from the amount of child support previously ordered.”
Funkhouser v. Funkhouser, 2019 Ohio 733 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“{¶ 35} Appellant’s request for the trial court to modify the existing child support order was governed by R.C. 3119.79. Carver v. Carver, 6th Dist.”
Sapinsley v. Sapinsley, 869 N.E.2d 702 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007).
“We held that the trial court erred by failing to “strictly comply with the terms of R.C. 3119.79 by completing a child-support worksheet and including it in the record.”
Mahlerwein v. Mahlerwein, 828 N.E.2d 153 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).
“{¶ 33} R.C. 3119.79(A) provides: “If an obligor or obligee under a child support order requests that the court modify the amount of support required to be paid pursuant to the child support order, the court shall recalculate the amount of *576 support that would be required to…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.79(B) — 3 cases
Mossing-Landers v. Landers, 2016 Ohio 7625 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
“Parties are entitled to file for modification at any time under R.C. 3119.79, assuming they can prove a change in circumstances under that section, and assuming they did not agree to forego attempts to modify support.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.79(C) — 47 cases
Phelps v. Saffian, 2016 Ohio 5514 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
“{¶13} When the parties to a child support order collectively earn more than $150,000, what constitutes a substantial change of circumstances from the original support order is unclear.”
Haun v. Haun, 2019 Ohio 5408 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“{¶9} R.C. 3119.79 governs motions to modify child support.”
Adams v. Adams, 2013 Ohio 2947 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
“79 controls the modification of child support orders and provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (A) If an obligor or obligee under a child support order requests that the court modify the amount of support required to be paid pursuant to the child support order, the court…”
Adams v. Adams, 2012 Ohio 5131 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
“{¶20} R.C. 3119.79 sets forth the necessary criteria and methodology for a trial court to modify an existing child support order as follows: (A) If an obligor or obligee under a child support order requests that the court modify the amount of support required to be paid pursuant…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.