Each city, exempted village, or local board of education shall have the management and control of all of the public schools of whatever name or character that it operates in its respective district. If the board has adopted an annual appropriation resolution, it may, by general resolution, authorize the superintendent or other officer to appoint janitors, superintendents of buildings, and such other employees as are provided for in such annual appropriation resolution.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1962–2023 · leading case: Scott v. News-Herald, 496 N.E.2d 699 (Ohio 1986).
Scott v. News-Herald, 496 N.E.2d 699 (Ohio 1986). · cites it 2דR.C. 3313.47 and 3319.01. 3 In addition, “the public has an interest in the qualifications and performance of” appellant as superintendent, “beyond the general public interest in the qualifications and performance of all government employees * * Rosenblatt, supra, at 86 .”
In re Appeal of Suspension of Huffer from Circleville High Sch., 546 N.E.2d 1308 (Ohio 1989). “” R.C. 3313.47 declares, in part, that “[e]ach * * * local board of education shall have the management and control of all the public schools * * * in its respective district.”
Woods v. Miamisburg City Schs., 254 F. Supp. 2d 868 (S.D. Ohio 2003). “” R.C. 3313.47 declares, in part, that “[e]ach * * * local board of education shall have the management and control of all the public schools * * * in its respective district.”
Alexander v. Youngstown Bd. of Educ., 454 F. Supp. 985 (N.D. Ohio 1978). · cites it 2דOhio Rev.Code § 3313.47. Such local boards historically have been delegated authority for the day-to-day operation of the schools within their respective districts.”
Vill. of Lucas v. Lucas Local Sch. Dist., 442 N.E.2d 449 (Ohio 1982). “Additionally, R.C. 3313.47 vests the management and control of the schools in the boards of education.”
Holroyd v. Eibling, 188 N.E.2d 797 (Ohio Ct. App. 1962). · cites it 2דSection 3313.47, Ee-vised Code, reads as follows: “Each city, exempted village, or local board of education shall have the management and control of all of the public schools of whatever name or.”
In Re Dembek, 64 B.R. 745 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1986). “district, correctly citing to O.R.C. 3313.47. That averment is irrelevant to a determination of the present issue and is unchallenged.”
oapse/afscme Local 4 v. Berdine, 880 N.E.2d 939 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007). “” Additionally, the board cites R.C. 3313.47, which provides: “Each city, exempted village, or local board of education shall have the management and control of all of the public schools of whatever name or character that it operates in its respective district.”
State Ex Rel. Barno v. Crestwood Bd. of Educ., 731 N.E.2d 701 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2דA R.C. 3313.47 and 3313.20(A) give boards of education authority to make policies that are necessary for the government of its schools and students.”
Ferris v. Paulding Exempted Vill. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Edn., 454 N.E.2d 957 (Ohio Ct. App. 1982). “R.C. 3313.47 prescribes that each “exempted village * * * board of education shall have the management and control of all the public schools of whatever name or character in its respective district.”
Columbus Educ. Ass'n v. Archuleta, 505 N.E.2d 279 (Ohio Ct. App. 1986). “In the absence of an express statutory command authorizing boards of education to engage in collective bargaining agreements with teachers, boards of education have done so voluntarily, acting within their discretionary authority to: manage and control public schools (R.C.…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.